Trying to take the moral high ground
 

"It wern't loike that wen I wrr getting my baps out... kids got to see my baps when dey was eating drr cornflakes... it wern't porn!"

...Please :joker:

She's bawling in the diary room because she knows damn well that it's not really any different at all, and that's an uncomfortable mirror to be presented with when you're older and wiser. When she said in all seriousness that what she did was "art". Page 3. Ffs.

She has a face like a melted welly nowadays..too many fags has made it all mangled.

She seems very bitter and twisted...

Major hypocrite. This comment was widely overlooked as well unfortunately just because she's not one of the 'public enemies'.

Art



...

Shes no suzanne mizzi.

Don't like her, she seems to think that she's better than everyone else in there

Sam is getting a bit more airtime and she is not coming across that well, she has a very bitchy look on her face at times

Page 3 of the 80s isn't the same as the surgically enhanced, full-frontal, totally uninhibited freak shows we get in the house today.

Yes, you have a point, but I don't think she can claim it was art either, if I'm honest.

I felt sorry for Sam when Heavy said that to her.....there is a difference between topless modelling and poll dancing in public , esp in that moment when the others were voicing their disapproval of Chloe. Even if Heavy thinks they are one and the same it was a mean thing to say at that moment and Sam prob felt humiliated.....it could earn him a nomination from Sam this week.

Well as a young 'un, every time I looked at 'Page 3', MY art rate soared. :laugh:

I agree... having said that, if Emmin can claim her unmade bed was art I'm thinking of exhibiting my holiday snaps because just about anything can be claimed to be art.

Oh Kirky... you were a tiny child in the 80s, surely x

I bet it did! :laugh:

Fair point! And I can't argue with that, Livia! :laugh: Tate Modern here you come!!:laugh:

:laugh: You are THE best Liv. I just wish that I was more your age now though, I would beat a trail to YOUR door. - even if only in hope. :hee:

In the meantime, I always have my Livia statue to console me. :laugh:

:laugh: Liv's holiday snaps - shorts, bikinis? The Tate would be packed out witth male Tibb members. :laugh:

Sure, but it's certainly not incomparable. Chloe models and does shoots too. The bottom line is that they both wear next to nothing for the media. Sam just wants to believe she's 'above' Chloe.

OK, it's not identical, but it's similar enough that surely she of all people in there shouldn't be judging the younger girls for getting their boobs out? And if she really thinks it was art...

But then again, I think the issue (based on a few other things she has said in there also) is that she DOESN'T particularly like that she got her start by essentially selling pictures of herself sans clothes... She hates it being mentioned at all. So surely if anything she should share that with them and how she feels about it now? Might make them consider that perspective. Instead she chooses to judge them, more than anyone else in there. It's just a bit odd.

Sams taken on the role as Renees bitch and is playing it to a T and making herself look stupid doing so, its cost her what chance she had of winning

Atleast Chloe and Marnie are on an adult show after 9pm.Old Sam Fox had her tits in peoples face while they ate their toast(which i have absolutely nothing against).However she can't claim any moral high ground at all.

:clap1::clap1:

I wasn't around when she was at the top of her 'work', however my family who were say she was pretty bad.
Also she did get into top shelf magazines too they say.

She has lost a lot of credibility really,she cannot now re-write her past no matter how much she would like to.

Yeah, I think she's coming across as bit high and mighty considering where she came from. She can't sing either in fairness. That song was only a success cause it was called "touch Me". Let's face it.

Strange to see a picture like that now though with no airbrushing, she actually looks like a real person instead of some sort of plastic doll, the way they look now

No real person would have that hair Niamh! Although I guess it was the 80's.

Interestingly the "plastic" has started being quite firmly rejected across the board these days though... All of the most viewed porn is the "amateur" / realistic stuff that's basically just normal people going at it :joker:.

I love Sam :love:

Oh Really? That's good I guess, might stop young girls mutilating themselves

Are these views FOR REAL? :laugh::laugh::laugh:

There is, and never has been, anything wrong with an attractive young adult female displaying her naked body - whether for 'art' or for 'money' - and there is nothing wrong with any adult male - of whatever age - enjoying the results.

However, there is, as Livia so rightly pointed out earlier, a huge gulf of difference in what Samantha Fox did with her 'naked body' in her heyday for money - and was willing to do - , and that which the dumb bimbo Chloe has done, and is doing with her 'naked body' for money.

Sam Fox appeared 'topless' and appeared in a few very mild 'bouncing boobs' so-called soft porn videos in her youth - akin to Barbara Windsor's antics in 'Carry On Camping - hardly shocking or 'Save The Children From This Horror' stuff.

And far from 'cashing in' on her 'topless' days for the remainder of her life, she has sought to get away from those elements of her past, even though there is NOTHING to be ashamed of, and even though they are nothing 'out of the ordinary when it comes to what other respectable actresses and models have done throughout history.

In addition, Sam Fox TURNED DOWN ludicrous amounts of filthy lucre to appear in fully blown, hard-core porn movies - REPEATEDLY.

Finally - apart from coming out as a 'Lesbian' - shock, horror, yeek! - Sam Fox has led a life FREE of any scandal.

Now compare that to the totally immoral, 'wanna be rich and famous at all costs and don't care what I have to do for it' Hard-Core porn star, sordid Web Cam proprietor, and Escort Hooker Chloe and DENY that there is a difference.

Finally; Sam Fox has done NOTHING to be ashamed of, but by what Code of Ethics or Law of Superiority, do we decree that a person's 'indiscretions', faux pas's , and questionable choices, made when young and far from fully mature, should preclude them from holding opinions on morality or any other issues, once that person has obeyed the Laws of Nature, and matured, acquired wisdom, and greater 'balance' and perception with 'Growing Older'?

FFS - NONE OF US would be qualified to pass an opinion if such was the case, and nor would ANY parent have the right to counsel and instruct their own children.

Yes, Chloe may 'mature', and acquire wisdom, and greater 'balance' and perception with growing older, but RIGHT NOW, she is young and immature, and totally immoral, and RIGHT NOW, Sam Fox has the wisdom, maturity, and balanced perception which being older brings, so she has ever right to speak her opinion.

In my opinion, of course.

Actually for me just thinking about his now as I wasn't there in the 80s,you can look across the board at all programming now and not just BB as to what goes onmore freely now.

However Sam Fox was one of the peopje,who started to bring nudity into 'general newspapers', for people to lust over and fantasise about.
Had she not done so, probably not but what is now acceptable may have not come to be.

No moral high ground can she take, I really like her and even like her songs from the late 80s too but she was for sure one who helped open the door generally to more suggestive behaviour and nudity, no matter how much she would love to now gloss over that fact.

It is incomparable.
Sam Fox: low-res, low DPI images of young girls with their tops off - just their tops - and not generally in sexual poses.

Chloe Khan: Full frontal, high-res images in Playboy... no-holds-barred videos available online with very little searching, added to her performance in the house... sliding up and down a pole with her comedy tits out, straddling Bear and bumping up and down on his junk... quite clearly having full sex in a range of places...

Sam IS above Chloe You can't compare Page 3 in the 1980s with what Chloe does.

You never heard of Boticelli?

Chloes tits look more like something Picasso would have painted, abstract, as in NOT REMOTELY REAL!

well said Livia, so much reaching on here by fans of the tramps

You forgot to mention Chloe left her child to pursue a career based on filth, she cant even put on fake tan without it looking dirty and she is a filthy skank

other than that...............

And as the plastic is mainly being 'rejected across the board' this stupid slut is filling herself with it

hopefully she will pop and bits of her (and the plastic)will be left in the gutter where she belongs!

:laugh: Thank you Miranda, and you are correct, I DID forget that.

I remember a playground song from Primary School.

It was to the tune of Nena's, 99 Red Balloons, and went.

99 and 66
Samantha Fox has got big t***


Even us 7 and 8 year old's knew all about Sam Fox's assets.

We were a cultured bunch of youngsters.

You still are, Alfie.

And I've worked out your age LOL... you're 3-4 years older than me. A very good vintage if I may say....

Not quite, google Sam Fox naked. If you feel like seeing a bit of muff. natural mind, none of this bald eagle rubbish...

Er.. no you're all right Vicky LOL...


Yes I suppose she did calendars and mags and stuff... but she was most famous for Page 3. If you wanted more you had to look for it. Today you just need to Google Chloe Khan Porn and it's allll there. I still uphold she's further up Moral Hill than Chloe.