ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Diane James Elected new UKIP leader - she has now Stepped Down (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=309937)

arista 16-09-2016 12:40 PM

Diane James Elected new UKIP leader - she has now Stepped Down
 
Live on SkyNewsHD now


http://news.sky.com/story/farage-we-...-back-10580159

MB. 16-09-2016 12:40 PM

hew

arista 16-09-2016 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MB. (Post 8978715)
hew


she is the one that avoided debates and TV interviews

arista 16-09-2016 12:42 PM

http://www.dianejamesmep.com/uploads...1296_orig.jpeg

Northern Monkey 16-09-2016 12:47 PM

Don't like her.UKIP won't attract nearly as many voters with her at the helm.I think it was more of a coronation than leadership race tbf.She had it in the bag.Now if Paul Nuttall had run he would've definitely given her a run for her money.He is a much more likeable character and better politician imo.

bots 16-09-2016 01:10 PM

woo .... who?

Crimson Dynamo 16-09-2016 01:17 PM

With a taste for elections, the businesswoman and healthcare consultant stood as an MEP for South East England and won, joining Nigel Farage in the European Parliament.

She then quietly carved her way through the party hierarchy becoming its deputy chairwoman and spokeswoman on justice and home affairs.

She briefly blipped on the radar after telling LBC's Iain Dale that she admired Vladimir Putin as a "strong leader" and suggested UKIP and the Russian leader shared a common distaste of the European Union.

When she announced her candidacy following Mr Farage's election, she was catapulted to front runner after the deputy leader Paul Nuttall refused to join the race and second favourite Steven Woolfe was disqualified.

This made Ms James an unlikely favourite, winning the support of Mr Farage and the party's moneybags, Arron Banks, who helped fund her campaign.

Sky News understands that on his advice, she pulled out of the 12 leadership hustings to the consternation of many in the party and decided instead to run her own events, unchallenged by debate.

Her election spells trouble for the anti-Farage modernists including former deputy chairwoman Suzanne Evans, UKIP's only MP Douglas Carswell and fellow MEP Patrick O'Flynn.

In an interview this summer she made it clear she supports a purge: "There's going to be no place in UKIP under my leadership for those who have sought or seek to destabilise, destroy or even obstruct what a new constitution will outline for the new governance of this party."

But with defections and disunity rife, and a sense that the party has achieved its mission, will she be able to maintain the momentum set by her predecessor?


http://news.sky.com/story/the-full-s...eader-10580026

Braden 16-09-2016 01:17 PM

I'm not a UKIP supporter at all, but I think Diane James is a good choice for leadership. She tends to be very confident in her politics and comes across professional whenever I watch her on television.

I doubt UKIP will be as signifcant within UK politics during her reign though. I can't really see where UKIP goes from the point of the referendum, but then I don't know much about the party to be completely honest.

MB. 16-09-2016 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 8978716)
she is the one that avoided debates and TV interviews

Oh, I meant UKIP in general

Cal. 16-09-2016 01:22 PM

They have no chance now. Near enough everyone who follows UKIP are bigots and probably still have a medieval view of women. Sorry about it.

Crimson Dynamo 16-09-2016 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cal. (Post 8978759)
They have no chance now. Near enough everyone who follows UKIP are bigots and probably still have a medieval view of women. Sorry about it.

OK

can you let the forum know what actual evidence you have to back up that statement?

(I will go and get a cuppa meanwhile)

Black Dagger 16-09-2016 01:28 PM

You hate the gays. He's not wrong

Northern Monkey 16-09-2016 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cal. (Post 8978759)
They have no chance now. Near enough everyone who follows UKIP are bigots and probably still have a medieval view of women. Sorry about it.

I'll just leave this here....

bigot
ˈbɪɡət/
noun
a person who is intolerant towards those holding different opinions.

Withano 16-09-2016 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey (Post 8978767)
I'll just leave this here....

bigot
ˈbɪɡət/
noun
a person who is intolerant towards those holding different opinions.

You're acting intolerant to her opinion.. Much like a UKIP voter might be :suspect: who did you vote for?

MTVN 16-09-2016 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey (Post 8978722)
Don't like her.UKIP won't attract nearly as many voters with her at the helm.I think it was more of a coronation than leadership race tbf.She had it in the bag.Now if Paul Nuttall had run he would've definitely given her a run for her money.He is a much more likeable character and better politician imo.

Yeah she didn't even take part in any of the leadership debates so it makes a bit of a mockery of the whole 'contest'

That said she was the best of a bad bunch of candidates and she seems fairly competent and will probably be a more moderate figure than Farage

Crimson Dynamo 16-09-2016 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 8978787)
You're acting intolerant to her opinion.. Much like a UKIP voter might be :suspect: who did you vote for?

incorrect the poster is highlighting a delicious irony

perhaps you missed it?

Withano 16-09-2016 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 8978790)
incorrect the poster is highlighting a delicious irony

perhaps you missed it?

You missing my irony is the most ironic.. Much like a UKIP voter probably would do. :suspect: who did you vote for?

Mystic Mock 16-09-2016 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 8978716)
she is the one that avoided debates and TV interviews

So they've got a gutless leader then?

the truth 16-09-2016 02:40 PM

so much for ukip all being sexist bigots, another lie from their opponents...she seems a pretty steady hand though not as charismatic as mr farage...shes certainly more attractive am i allowed to say that in 2016

Mystic Mock 16-09-2016 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 8978763)
OK

can you let the forum know what actual evidence you have to back up that statement?

(I will go and get a cuppa meanwhile)

They removed someone from the party that believed in gay marriage.

And here's articles to do with their prejudice, and undemocratic opinions over the years.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-25793358

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015...n_6733996.html Very high compared to every other party in this country.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/poli...candidate.html

Mystic Mock 16-09-2016 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the truth (Post 8978820)
so much for ukip all being sexist bigots, another lie from their opponents...she seems a pretty steady hand though not as charismatic as mr farage...shes certainly more attractive am i allowed to say that in 2016

So everybody else is wrong but UKIP are misunderstood? This is giving me certain vibes from the 1940's only more mild.

Crimson Dynamo 16-09-2016 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 8978839)
So everybody else is wrong but UKIP are misunderstood? This is giving me certain vibes from the 1940's only more mild.

How is that evidence that 'nearly everyone is a bigot"?

I an not saying no member is but I am afraid yiu miss the point

Mystic Mock 16-09-2016 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 8978844)
How is that evidence that 'nearly everyone is a bigot"?

I an not saying no member is but I am afraid yiu miss the point

UKIP has a repetation for it, even amongst other right wing parties that find them a bit extreme on the prejudice front, that tells you that a higher than average amount for any other party has a prejudice in UKIP.

Plus the fact that they have removed people from the party with even one liberal viewpoint, you don't see that happening in the Tory Party, or Labour, this should worry you on how undemocratic that they can be that if you disagree with one of their stances they'll remove you from the party.

The bigger question that you need to ask yourself is what would they do if they was running the country and the public disagreed with one of their policies? They don't seem to take it lying down if you get what I mean.

bots 16-09-2016 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 8978851)
UKIP has a repetation for it, even amongst other right wing parties that find them a bit extreme on the prejudice front, that tells you that a higher than average amount for any other party has a prejudice in UKIP.

Plus the fact that they have removed people from the party with even one liberal viewpoint, you don't see that happening in the Tory Party, or Labour, this should worry you on how undemocratic that they can be that if you disagree with one of their stances they'll remove you from the party.

The bigger question that you need to ask yourself is what would they do if they was running the country and the public disagreed with one of their policies? They don't seem to take it lying down if you get what I mean.

hmm, the labour party are currently looking in to deselecting sitting MP's that don't share Jeremy's vision. Just saying

arista 16-09-2016 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 8978788)
Yeah she didn't even take part in any of the leadership debates so it makes a bit of a mockery of the whole 'contest'

That said she was the best of a bad bunch of candidates and she seems fairly competent and will probably be a more moderate figure than Farage


But she wants the UKIP NEC - Gone
and said any that want to stop her
collect their P.45


She is tougher than you know.

arista 16-09-2016 03:26 PM

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...49_636x525.jpg
Go on its just a Kiss

Crimson Dynamo 16-09-2016 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 8978851)
UKIP has a repetation for it, even amongst other right wing parties that find them a bit extreme on the prejudice front, that tells you that a higher than average amount for any other party has a prejudice in UKIP.

Plus the fact that they have removed people from the party with even one liberal viewpoint, you don't see that happening in the Tory Party, or Labour, this should worry you on how undemocratic that they can be that if you disagree with one of their stances they'll remove you from the party.

The bigger question that you need to ask yourself is what would they do if they was running the country and the public disagreed with one of their policies? They don't seem to take it lying down if you get what I mean.

Lol they do not , you may as well say that about any large party. They do not have one bigoted policy or principal. You need to stay off facebook and twitter and start watching serious news

We have a poster on here make a ludicrous claim and cannot back it up, its just salacious gossip of the younger generation reacting to soundbbites rather than evidence or personal research.


A large swathe of them could not even be bothered to vote in the last ref

:rolleyes:

Greg! 16-09-2016 03:35 PM

flop. ukip are over now that they have no purpose

Withano 16-09-2016 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 8978891)
Lol they do not , you may as well say that about any large party. They do not have one bigoted policy or principal. You need to stay off facebook and twitter and start watching serious news

We have a poster on here make a ludicrous claim and cannot back it up, its just salacious gossip of the younger generation reacting to soundbbites rather than evidence or personal research.


A large swathe of them could not even be bothered to vote in the last ref

:rolleyes:

You're not really saying that no UKIP party leader has recently said anything racist, homophobic or bigoted though are you? Cos that would be untrue.

lostalex 16-09-2016 03:48 PM

she looks a bit... red. in that photo. like a sarah palin left in the oven too long.

Jack_ 16-09-2016 03:52 PM

Who cares, Farage will be the leader again within 18 months

Crimson Dynamo 16-09-2016 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 8978897)
You're not really saying that no UKIP party leader has recently said anything racist, homophobic or bigoted though are you? Cos that would be untrue.

I cant recall Nigel saying anything matching those terms unless you can?

But I am not sure how that relates to the earlier hysterical claim from the "now absent" poster?

arista 16-09-2016 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg! (Post 8978893)
flop. ukip are over now that they have no purpose

Your are wrong
you can not say that
Until we are Fully out of the EU

so far no fecking date?
Thats wrong.

Crimson Dynamo 16-09-2016 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 8978905)
Who cares, Farage will be the leader again within 18 months

Jack, you are such a Nigel fanboy

what are you like :hee:

Northern Monkey 16-09-2016 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 8978788)
Yeah she didn't even take part in any of the leadership debates so it makes a bit of a mockery of the whole 'contest'

That said she was the best of a bad bunch of candidates and she seems fairly competent and will probably be a more moderate figure than Farage

She may well be good at her job.I just can't warm to her and i don't think she'll connect very well with the voters.Tbh i think UKIP's days are numbered now anyway.Unless they can come up with a new purpose like they had for leaving the EU.

Crimson Dynamo 16-09-2016 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey (Post 8978910)
She may well be good at her job.I just can't warm to her and i don't think she'll connect very well with the voters.Tbh i think UKIP's days are numbered now anyway.Unless they can come up with a new purpose like they had for leaving the EU.

To be fair, Labours days are numbered too so its not a unique position

kirklancaster 16-09-2016 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 8978912)
To be fair, Labours days are numbered too so its not a unique position

:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:: laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::l augh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::la ugh:


:clap1::clap1::clap1:

kirklancaster 16-09-2016 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 8978854)
hmm, the labour party are currently looking in to deselecting sitting MP's that don't share Jeremy's vision. Just saying

Someone NEEDS to say it BOTS - some of the totally ignorant and unfounded statements on here are cringeworthy. I DARE not respond because I would end up banned.

Northern Monkey 16-09-2016 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 8978787)
You're acting intolerant to her opinion.. Much like a UKIP voter might be :suspect: who did you vote for?

The post i quoted was a bigoted post.I did'nt act intolerant to anything.I just left the definition of the accusation made in the post.Just to clarify.I left no opinions in my post.

Cherie 16-09-2016 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 8978885)

:joker: great pic


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.