![]() |
The next minority being voted off
First they came for the trans. Then women. Now black people :( Malika next? Followed by Wayne and Shane J?
|
I'm surprised Malika wasn't up for eviction tbh :shrug: .
I'm literally getting my updates from this forum and the cbb website . I couldn't watch it . I knew G had no chance at surviving eviction ,his fanbase is poor :idc: . Daniel is like a cat with too many lives :bored: . I'm pretty sure bitch Shane J is safe AF , seen as he's in the final already. |
Most of the cast is a protected class of some kind... being female really isnt a minority though? (Just caught that myself)
|
the fact that the guy was a complete tosser had nothing to do with it of course
|
Quote:
|
Ffs
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk |
Threads like this just play into the "PC GONE MAD :sleep: :sleep:" pack mentality on here.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm almost certain that Malika will be evicted in Friday's eviction :(
|
Rasict sexist homophobic transphobic public at it again,,,,
|
Quote:
Amanda Barrie - Lesbian Female Ann Widdecombe - Female Ashley James - Female Courtney Act - (Shane Jenek) - Gender-fluid(?) / Gay Ginuwine - Black Male Minority India Willoughby - Transfemale Jess Impiazzi - Female John Barnes - Black Male Minority Maggie Oliver - Female Malika Haqq - Black Female Minority Rachel Johnson - Female Wayne Sleep - Gay Shane Lynch - Straight White Male Andrew Brady - Straight White Male (Though that is up for debate) Jonny Mitchell - Straight White Male Daniel O'Reilly - (Dapper Laughs) - Straight White Male 4 out of 16 are not protected classes. That's 25%. So there's at least a 75% chance, if anyone is voted off, they would be from some kind of protected group... and that's if you consider Andrew to still be straight BTW, women are not a minority, they are statistically about half the population :laugh: |
Blah blah blah....John was evicted because he talks and talks and talks and talks and talks and talks!!!!!
I now understand after watching his interview with Emma why the housemates all nominated him because they couldnt get a word in edgeways and that's why he was hardly featured in the highlights because when he talks I zone out as probably most of the country do. It's not because he was black don't be some pc douche it's not a good look. |
A bit of fuel for the OP:
The only ever white males to be evicted first in over 20 series of BB/CBB are Andrew Stone, Daniel Baldwin, Marco, and Grant Bovey. Not many is it? |
Quote:
I like to see people like the OP triggered by nonsense that's not important. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's kind of weird really because the majority of first evictees are female, yet on this forum females are always way more popular than males
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Think Shilpa was the closest and she was Indian. But I don't care about the minority argument,as Ginuwine didn't have a chance . But John shouldn't of been back doored but whatever at least he made idiots realise he's not prejudice. |
Quote:
|
-Wayne, Amanda and Shane J are all triple evicted-
Emma: so why do yall think you're sat here tonight? -awkward silence before someone points out they are all el bee gee tee plus- Wayne: well- Emma: hereS YA BEST BITS AGAIN! |
Quote:
Big brother has had the most diverse casting ever in reality TV history. |
Quote:
As in, second place is good. |
Quote:
In fact, it doesn't even matter if you are Asian and spent 99% of your life someplace where your demographic is mostly 100% of that population. As soon as you enter the US/UK, you are a protected class, your prior status in life is no longer relevant. |
This thread talks about minorities, or the 'groups' which the HMs belong to. This means seeing the HMs in a certain way.
Not judging the HMs as individuals, but judging them according to their 'type' or their 'category' (race, gender, sexuality etc). This way of thinking is called collectivist thinking. Collectivist thinking doesn't judge people as individuals, but instead judges everyone according to their type (their race, their gender, their sexual orientation etc). Collectivists see all society not made up of individuals, but made up of 'groups'. So instead of seeing John Barnes simply as 'John Barnes', collectivists would see him as 'a black man', or they'd see Ashley as 'a white woman', or see Shane J as 'a homosexual' etc etc This type of thinking is a way of generalising people, and it usually comes with a judgement system for those generalisations, almost like a rating system. So for example, 'racial collectivists' (such as the KKK or Black Lives Matter) would perceive then judge people according to their race, and would rate them accordingly: Some people think blacks are the problem. Some think whites are the problem. Some men are misogynists, some feminists hate men. Jews, Muslims, Christians etc all have their divisions, their judgements of each other and their history of conflict. Same with wars between nations. It all comes from collectivist thinking. Sometimes this collectivist thinking has good intentions, for example in order to have diversity people have to be perceived and judged not as individuals, but purely according to their racial type/gender/sexuality/religion etc in order to tick the boxes and meet the goals of diversity. The irony being that, however well-intended, that is the same type of thinking as racism: to judge people according to their type and place them accordingly. Is it healthy to see and separate us all off like this, to judge and rate us all in this way? Is it not better to see us all as the individuals we are, regardless of our 'type'? Surely it's better to remember the words of Martin Luther King: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." Martin Luther King, Jr. Individual thinking or Collectivist thinking? YOU decide ! |
Quote:
Positive discrimination is discrimination nonetheless. Although I know I can talk because I always want a man out first, but that's just my personal OCD thing lol. Which has been caused by years and years of women going first, which eventually pissed me off. |
Quote:
It's true. We all do it though. Like cheering on our team. But yeah it was ALWAYS a woman out first, that annoyed me too. I remember the joy when Andrew Stone was evicted which was first time a guy went out 1st i think? |
Wow this blew up I was just joking :joker:
|
Quote:
Andrew Stone felt like the first lol, it marked the end of an era for me, thankyou Andrew Stone |
Quote:
Hard to tell these days ! You sounded like the real deal. ! Oh well i was in the mood for a random keyboard rant anyway, and maybe someone will get something from all me cyber-waffling :banana: |
Quote:
A winner should win due to their time in the house entertaining the nation. Viewers are extremely scared they should be pro black or pro Indian, trans ect just sit back and enjoy their personalities. Your post is everything wrong with people being over pc....you're judging others on voting out people who are a different culture yet you probably don't care but feel you should so jump on the bandwagon even though the 2 black housemates were evicted because they SUCKED! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I was sorry John went, Daniel should have gone, and I quite liked Ginuwine but Im amazed Andrew wasnt up, I would love to see him go before the final! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.