ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB19 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=728)
-   -   will the eatock eye come back? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=334622)

T* 26-01-2018 01:20 PM

will the eatock eye come back?
 
with these hopeful rumours of a back to basics series do you think they’ll ask the original eye designer daniel eatock to do it again? it would be lovely, although he might tell C5 to **** off after they rejected his BB12 eye in favour of C5’s in-house ****e.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-0dgNBVWgfv...gbrother12.jpg
Also hopefully they’ll get rid of SHOP and get Hello Charlie back, although they did do BB12’s and BB13’s titles but I guess the tackiness was through fault of C5, not them

Shaun 26-01-2018 01:30 PM

NO. GET OVER IT.

T* 26-01-2018 01:33 PM

:(

Mec 26-01-2018 01:33 PM

Channel 5's eye template is fine though? I kind of prefer it to the eatock eye, it looks more modern.

T* 26-01-2018 01:36 PM

it’s ugly and tacky!

y.winter 26-01-2018 03:22 PM

IS this what the Eatock eye should've been for BB12? Is it supposed to be a Rorschach or something?
Quite ugly tbh...

Babayaro. 26-01-2018 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by y.winter (Post 9823463)
IS this what the Eatock eye should've been for BB12? Is it supposed to be a Rorschach or something?
Quite ugly tbh...

Nnn it literally is. It comes up when you search for Rorschach lol.

Marsh. 26-01-2018 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by y.winter (Post 9823463)
IS this what the Eatock eye should've been for BB12? Is it supposed to be a Rorschach or something?
Quite ugly tbh...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babayaro. (Post 9823483)
Nnn it literally is. It comes up when you search for Rorschach lol.

That's the point.

Next you'll be telling us the BB1 eye looks like it belongs to a human or the BB2 eye is based on a flickering television.

Babayaro. 26-01-2018 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 9823491)
That's the point.

Next you'll be telling us the BB1 eye looks like it belongs to a human or the BB2 eye is based on a flickering television.

Yes, but then it's not really his own design then, is it? Unless that site I found it on nicked it from.

Marsh. 26-01-2018 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babayaro. (Post 9823507)
Yes, but then it's not really his own design then, is it? Unless that site I found it on nicked it from.

He didn't design the human eye either but that aint the point. :hugesmile:

It's based on the Rorschach test, it isn't the actual one.

y.winter 26-01-2018 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 9823491)
That's the point.

Next you'll be telling us the BB1 eye looks like it belongs to a human or the BB2 eye is based on a flickering television.

Well it looked like nothing when I was first looking at it...

You don't have to shout
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/...2872603254.jpg

Marsh. 26-01-2018 03:39 PM

Get that ginger mutt outta MA FACE!!!

RileyH 26-01-2018 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T* (Post 9823081)

this is ugly

Jay. 26-01-2018 04:23 PM

i kind of prefer what they did with this cbb, like a real-ishlooking eye

Oaker 26-01-2018 04:24 PM

No and honestly the C5 template is fine they just don't know how to use it properly

Jodie. 26-01-2018 04:48 PM

I don’t think they’ll ask eatock but I think they’ll stick with the eye they’ve got now idk how they could change it tho

T* 26-01-2018 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babayaro. (Post 9823507)
Yes, but then it's not really his own design then, is it? Unless that site I found it on nicked it from.

sis...

Babayaro. 26-01-2018 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T* (Post 9823746)
sis...

Well you said they rejected his BB12 eye. Is it his or not?

T* 26-01-2018 05:55 PM

It is his but bitch the BB14 eye had doors in it it doesn’t mean it’s stealing the idea of the inventor of doors is it

Babayaro. 26-01-2018 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T* (Post 9823874)
It is his but bitch the BB14 eye had doors in it it doesn’t mean it’s stealing the idea of the inventor of doors is it

That's fine, and not what I was saying. All I was getting at was that whenever you search for Rorschach, that eye is one of the first images to come up and links you to some online test/quiz thing and before I knew it was his actual design, I assumed it was just some random inkblot that just so happened to look like an eye, once I found it on google.

Got IT???? :oh:

Marsh. 26-01-2018 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babayaro. (Post 9823899)
That's fine, and not what I was saying. All I was getting at was that whenever you search for Rorschach, that eye is one of the first images to come up and links you to some online test/quiz things and before I knew it was his actual design, I assumed it was just some random inkblot that just so happened to look like an eye.

Got IT???? :oh:

Ya bloody thick bitch.

T* 26-01-2018 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babayaro. (Post 9823899)
That's fine, and not what I was saying. All I was getting at was that whenever you search for Rorschach, that eye is one of the first images to come up and links you to some online test/quiz thing and before I knew it was his actual design, I assumed it was just some random inkblot that just so happened to look like an eye, once I found it on google.

Got IT???? :oh:

because it would look exactly like the eye template??? you silly mare!

Babayaro. 26-01-2018 07:39 PM

You need to be more clear, I reckon

T* 26-01-2018 07:57 PM

you need to get some logic!!!

Rob! 26-01-2018 09:14 PM

Tbh I’m hoping they keep this new one they’ve started with this series. I bet they could make that look amazing.

kingston 26-01-2018 09:14 PM

No... Just as I said in the other thread about the outdoor set... Whether you like the graphics or not they do little to improve or detract from the quality of the show... I'd rather production focus on fundamentals rather than cosmetics... Whether you want to admit it or not your suggestions so far are insignificant, childish, and trivial...

T* 27-01-2018 02:46 PM

The aesthetic of the show has a lot to do with the enjoyment and the eye is a nostalgia factor for people who enjoyed it during the C4 era, and because I’m in the industry it interests me as the graphics during a lot of the C5 era have been subpar. I don’t care what Kingston from Canada thinks of my ‘suggestions’ (when it was just a question too lol) I care about what other people who remember and enjoyed the series when it was on c4 feel about it and the rumoured efforts of them bringing it back to standard with the hiring of one of the old producers etc. Don’t like it? Don’t open my damn threads just to be smug and patronising because you add nothing to the conversation.

Jarrod 27-01-2018 06:04 PM

SHOP are actually the same people who designed the logos at Hello Charlie - they just opened their own brands. I did an interview with them in 2015:
Quote:


I’ve actually been working on the graphics for BB since 2007. Whilst working at Hello Charlie I worked on the titles sequence and ‘kit of parts’ for the show. When the show moved to Five we got asked to design the Eye itself. In 2013 I set up Shop with my design partner Tom Hodgkinson. At that time, Endemol asked us if we’d like to pitch for the next series which we were delighted to do. We won that pitch and have worked on the show ever since.

y.winter 27-01-2018 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jarrod (Post 9827177)
SHOP are actually the same people who designed the logos at Hello Charlie - they just opened their own brands. I did an interview with them in 2015:

Good to know. That explains the change.

T* 27-01-2018 06:20 PM

Hello Charlie still exists as an agency though right?

Brekkie 28-01-2018 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T* (Post 9826817)
The aesthetic of the show has a lot to do with the enjoyment and the eye is a nostalgia factor for people who enjoyed it during the C4 era, and because I’m in the industry it interests me as the graphics during a lot of the C5 era have been subpar.

Rubbish - people get nostalgia for the eye because they associated it with a good series. If it was all about the eye BB4 and BB10 would be ranked amongst the best series.

I will give credit to C5 for maintaining the annual update of the look and indeed increasing it, though I think the latter is probably more about distracting from the shows obvious issues. It is also a double edged sword as you often get a decent package which is then dropped for the next series.

Really though money would be better spent elsewhere and the look of the show could remain relatively consitent across 2-3 years. BB Canada is without doubt the best of the franchise lately and though there are changes to the graphics each year to fit in with the house theme the look has actually been pretty much the same since the first series.

Quote:

Originally Posted by T* (Post 9826817)
I don’t care what Kingston from Canada thinks of my ‘suggestions’ (when it was just a question too lol) I care about what other people who remember and enjoyed the series when it was on c4 feel about it and the rumoured efforts of them bringing it back to standard with the hiring of one of the old producers etc. Don’t like it? Don’t open my damn threads just to be smug and patronising because you add nothing to the conversation.

Rude and ignorant. Don't start a thread on a forum if you're not prepared for people to disagree.

andybigbro 27-04-2018 10:53 PM

Eatocks Bb12 eye was ugly I’m glad they rejected it.

Lostie! 27-04-2018 11:45 PM

Honestly I'd like more CBB7 / CBB21 style eyes. They were two of the very best imo.

kingston 28-04-2018 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andybigbro (Post 9974103)
Eatocks Bb12 eye was ugly I’m glad they rejected it.

I agree... I was unsure of it at first but the BB12 logo was an improvement and a much needed change... That said keeping the cloud motif in subsequent series was just lazy...

kingston 28-04-2018 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lostie! (Post 9974184)
Honestly I'd like more CBB7 / CBB21 style eyes. They were two of the very best imo.

Both of these logos were a refreshing change from a design pattern that was becoming a bit dated... I’d be interested to see what they could do if they continued with this style...

Eddie. 28-04-2018 01:17 AM

CBB21’s eye, just without the eyeliner would be good for 19...

TomC 28-04-2018 01:25 AM

Absolutely not. Why would it?

kingston 28-04-2018 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomC (Post 9974330)
Absolutely not. Why would it?

Because there is a belief that the old way (Channel 4 era) is always the best way and that Channel 5 couldn’t possibly ever do anything better than what they’ve been doing... At least according to the OP of this thread anyways...

Marsh. 28-04-2018 01:55 AM

Channel 5 are sh*te right down from the smallest things up to the largest, every single thing about it is. That's just facts.

kingston 28-04-2018 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 9974427)
Channel 5 are sh*te right down from the smallest things up to the largest, every single thing about it is. That's just facts.

Not true... In the earlier years of the Channel 5 era design was one of the things I believe Channel 5 did much better than their predecessor... That's not to say I believe they were perfect but it was a refreshing and much needed change from something that had become tired and overused...


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.