ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Chester Hospital:Healthcare worker arrested on suspicion of murdering 8 babies (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=342992)

arista 03-07-2018 01:07 PM

Chester Hospital:Healthcare worker arrested on suspicion of murdering 8 babies
 
https://news.sky.com/story/healthcar...abies-11424735

[A female healthcare worker has been arrested on suspicion of murdering eight babies and attempting to murder another six.
Police said the arrest followed an ongoing investigation of the neonatal unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital, which got under way after several babies died at the hospital.
Officers were initially looking at the deaths of 15 infants between June 2015 and June 2016 when the investigation was launched in May last year]

This is terrible news

https://e3.365dm.com/18/07/1096x616/...20180703105004

Livia 04-07-2018 09:05 AM

That "healthcare worker" is a nurse. This is the NHS being obstructive as ever. I'm pleased this story is out. The NHS, for all the great work it does, closes ranks under accusation.

Vicky. 04-07-2018 09:23 AM

Oh this is so awful..just why on earth would someone do this..

Livia 04-07-2018 09:25 AM

It was bad enough hearing about the doctor who killed all those elderly people and was repremanded, but not struck off. But to hear of someone killing babies... I can't get my head around it.

Vicky. 04-07-2018 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10070853)
It was bad enough hearing about the doctor who killed all those elderly people and was repremanded, but not struck off. But to hear of someone killing babies... I can't get my head around it.

Yeah I just said that to Gavin..like..its not as bad when its adults they are killing, but babies in the neonatal unit..who are already chance to be fighting for their lives (neonatal is where the seriously premature babies go right?)..its just unthinkable really.

Niamh. 04-07-2018 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 10070857)
Yeah I just said that to Gavin..like..its not as bad when its adults they are killing, but babies in the neonatal unit..who are already chance to be fighting for their lives (neonatal is where the seriously premature babies go right?)..its just unthinkable really.

100% what kind of a mind must this "person" have to so something like that

Kazanne 04-07-2018 09:29 AM

This story is quite disturbing and scarey, the poor parents of these babies.

Amy Jade 04-07-2018 09:33 AM

I have loads of mutual friends with her on facebook. This is so messed up, I will never understand how anyone could want to harm an innocent baby.

I can't see much of her page but my friend said she was always sharing posts about baby care units and the NHS and how nurses need support. Sick bitch.

LaLaLand 04-07-2018 10:50 PM

Innocent until proven guilty, yet social media want her head.

Will hold my opinion until we know more.

Nicky91 05-07-2018 07:09 AM

this story is very disturbing, who would even want to kill poor innocent babies

LaLaLand 06-07-2018 05:22 PM

She's been released on bail.

arista 06-07-2018 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonnii (Post 10074771)
She's been released on bail.


Thats so wrong.

GoldHeart 06-07-2018 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 10070861)
This story is quite disturbing and scarey, the poor parents of these babies.

It reminds me of a old story years of a nurse who was a serial killer
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/...ukcrime.health

Both stories are horrible and disturbing :shocked:

LaLaLand 06-07-2018 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 10074788)
Thats so wrong.

Why? They don't have 100% hard evidence to charge her or they clearly would have with the number of deaths.

LaLaLand 06-07-2018 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 10074800)
It reminds me of a old story years of a nurse who was a serial killer
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/...ukcrime.health

Both stories are horrible and disturbing :shocked:

I remember her! Pure evil.

RichardG 06-07-2018 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonnii (Post 10074801)
Why? They don't have 100% hard evidence to charge her or they clearly would have with the number of deaths.

That's what worried me yesterday when watching the news reports, the frequent use of the word 'suspected'. You shouldn't be allowed to broadcast someones face all over the television and the internet next to such severe accusations unless they've been charged and convicted. If she's innocent, she'll never be able to move on from this.

LaLaLand 06-07-2018 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardG (Post 10074818)
That's what worried me yesterday when watching the news reports, the frequent use of the word 'suspected'. You shouldn't be allowed to broadcast someones face all over the television and the internet next to such severe accusations unless they've been charged and convicted. If she's innocent, she'll never be able to move on from this.

I agree, her identity should only be revealed if and when she's charged in a court of law.

-If- she's innocent and this is somehow one big mix-up or misunderstanding, her life is absolutely over.

Brillopad 06-07-2018 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 10069680)
https://news.sky.com/story/healthcar...abies-11424735

[A female healthcare worker has been arrested on suspicion of murdering eight babies and attempting to murder another six.
Police said the arrest followed an ongoing investigation of the neonatal unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital, which got under way after several babies died at the hospital.
Officers were initially looking at the deaths of 15 infants between June 2015 and June 2016 when the investigation was launched in May last year]

This is terrible news

https://e3.365dm.com/18/07/1096x616/...20180703105004

It’s early days - she’s been arrested not charged - nevermind found guilty. Let’s not do a trial by newspaper shall we.

GoldHeart 07-07-2018 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonnii (Post 10074821)
I agree, her identity should only be revealed if and when she's charged in a court of law.

-If- she's innocent and this is somehow one big mix-up or misunderstanding, her life is absolutely over.

It's one hell of a F UP ! if this is one big "mistake " . And i feel that's unlikely otherwise why did they arrest her in the first place? , they must of had good reason :suspect: she must of behaved guilty .

kirklancaster 07-07-2018 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardG (Post 10074818)
That's what worried me yesterday when watching the news reports, the frequent use of the word 'suspected'. You shouldn't be allowed to broadcast someones face all over the television and the internet next to such severe accusations unless they've been charged and convicted. If she's innocent, she'll never be able to move on from this.

:clap1::clap1::clap1: It is time that the law was changed to prevent this from happening, Richard. It is wrong and unfair.

Brillopad 07-07-2018 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 10075747)
It's one hell of a F UP ! if this is one big "mistake " . And i feel that's unlikely otherwise why did they arrest her in the first place? , they must of had good reason :suspect: she must of behaved guilty .

Out of interest have you ever felt guilty about something when you’re not - I know I have. You feel some people think you are and almost believe it yourself except you know you’re not. Coincidence often gets misconstrued by those with an agenda.

Kazanne 07-07-2018 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 10075792)
Out of interest have you ever felt guilty about something when you’re not - I know I have. You feel some people think you are and almost believe it yourself except you know you’re not. Coincidence often gets misconstrued by those with an agenda.

Yes brillo,I have felt that:wavey:

Brillopad 07-07-2018 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 10075794)
Yes brillo,I have felt that:wavey:

It’s horrible Kaz - so frustrating! :shrug:

kirklancaster 07-07-2018 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 10075792)
Out of interest have you ever felt guilty about something when you’re not - I know I have. You feel some people think you are and almost believe it yourself except you know you’re not. Coincidence often gets misconstrued by those with an agenda.

If she is eventually found innocent of any wrongdoing, there will always be some people who have the IQ of a peanut that do not keep abreast of current affairs who will know that she has been accused of this but not that she has been cleared.

If she is eventually found innocent of any wrongdoing, there will always also be some people who KNOW that she has been cleared but do not accept it because 'There Is No Smoke Without Fire' in their minds.

Anonymity, until proved guilty in a Court of Law, is THE only way to protect an innocent person from both categories of the above.

And innocent people who have been WRONGLY accused of such heinous crimes NEED protecting.

Brillopad 07-07-2018 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kirklancaster (Post 10075798)
If she is eventually found innocent of any wrongdoing, there will always be some people who have the IQ of a peanut that do not keep abreast of current affairs who will know that she has been accused of this but not that she has been cleared.

If she is eventually found innocent of any wrongdoing, there will always also be some people who KNOW that she has been cleared but do not accept it because 'There Is No Smoke Without Fire' in their minds.

Anonymity, until proved guilty in a Court of Law, is THE only way to protect an innocent person from both categories of the above.

And innocent people who have been WRONGLY accused of such heinous crimes NEED protecting.

I agree Kirk. I just ask myself - WHY - it makes no sense. All that training for what! I just can’t get my head round what she has been accused of. If she had any kind of ‘history’ it is unlikely she would have been accepted into a training programme.

Why would an intelligent capable woman with a promising future start killing babies! Surely someone that disturbed wouldn’t have slipped between the cracks! I would really like to know what ‘evidence’ they have!

GoldHeart 07-07-2018 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 10075792)
Out of interest have you ever felt guilty about something when you’re not - I know I have. You feel some people think you are and almost believe it yourself except you know you’re not. Coincidence often gets misconstrued by those with an agenda.

But it's such a serious horrible crime to be accused of , the point I'm making is the police must of had some lead ?! . I don't know what to make of the whole thing . I keep thinking about the poor babies .

jaxie 08-07-2018 02:51 PM

You read and hear of lots of horrible crimes but it's cases like this I find hardest to understand, even where wrong doing is proved you think surely not because it seems to unbelievable that anyone would set out to hurt babies.

jaxie 08-07-2018 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kirklancaster (Post 10075798)
If she is eventually found innocent of any wrongdoing, there will always be some people who have the IQ of a peanut that do not keep abreast of current affairs who will know that she has been accused of this but not that she has been cleared.

If she is eventually found innocent of any wrongdoing, there will always also be some people who KNOW that she has been cleared but do not accept it because 'There Is No Smoke Without Fire' in their minds.

Anonymity, until proved guilty in a Court of Law, is THE only way to protect an innocent person from both categories of the above.

And innocent people who have been WRONGLY accused of such heinous crimes NEED protecting.

I agree they shouldn't name names. Remember the poor guy who was named and photo'd all over the press for the murder of Rachel Nickell in front of her toddler? He was tried by press, hounded, the police tried to get him with a honey trap and it turned out that it had nothing to do with him. Poor man. Being a bit weird isn't a crime.

GoldHeart 08-07-2018 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaxie (Post 10077486)
You read and hear of lots of horrible crimes but it's cases like this I find hardest to understand, even where wrong doing is proved you think surely not because it seems to unbelievable that anyone would set out to hurt babies.

Exactly, and it isn't just one baby she's accused of harming or killing ( which would still be horrible) , but 8 BABIES!!! :shocked: . And it only seems to be her they've accused , they must of had a serious suspicion about her ! .

LaLaLand 12-06-2019 09:51 PM

She was rearrested a few days ago, three new potential attempted murders...

Quote:

A nurse has been rearrested by police investigating the deaths of babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital's neo-natal unit.

Lucy Letby was first arrested in July last year on suspicion of the murder of eight babies and the attempted murder of another six.

She has now been rearrested in connection with the attempted murder of three additional babies, police said.

Cheshire Police are probing the deaths of 17 infants between 2015 and 2016.

The force launched an investigation two years ago and officers are also investigating 16 non-fatal collapses at the neonatal unit during the same period of March 2015 to July 2016.

Ms Letby, originally from Hereford, had been on bail since July after her home in Chester was searched by police.

A spokesman for the Countess of Chester Hospital said it was "co-operating fully" with the investigation.

Det Insp Paul Hughes said the investigation was "extremely challenging" and that parents of all the babies were being kept fully updated.

"We fully appreciate that it continues to have a big impact on all those involved - including the families of the babies, staff and patients at the hospital as well as members of the public," he said.

"This is an extremely difficult time for all the families and it is important to remember that, at the heart of this, there are a number of bereaved families seeking answers as to what happened to their children."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...yside-48580787

bots 13-06-2019 03:15 AM

i don't understand why she was allowed out. Those are serious crimes she is charged with

arista 11-10-2022 01:17 AM

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/l...818287d5a.jpeg

arista 11-10-2022 01:18 AM

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/l...985c8f94f7.png

thesheriff443 11-10-2022 01:23 AM

The trial is expected to take 6 months

arista 11-10-2022 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesheriff443 (Post 11217641)
The trial is expected to take 6 months

Too long

arista 11-10-2022 01:25 AM

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/l...66c3a3d4ac.png

LaLaLand 11-10-2022 01:47 AM

The details of this case thus far are just harrowing. Jesus.

arista 11-10-2022 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaLaLand (Post 11217647)
The details of this case thus far are just harrowing. Jesus.


Yes so Evil.

arista 11-10-2022 02:08 AM

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/l...2915db4a2a.png

Mystic Mock 11-10-2022 03:14 AM

If she's guilty then I hope that she never gets out.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.