Piers Morgan put in his place by GMB guest
 

Give this woman a medal :clap1:

Yes she has some Spunk

She ended him, screaming

piers morgan is so ugly, he serves typical trump supporter

Rubbish
he was the Editor of the Daily Mirror
and worked for CNN USA
before this.

She came across and rude, arrogant and ignorant.

What a disgustingly ageist remark!

Isn't she the one C5 asked for CBB and she put the email on twitter :skull:

Piers Interviewed Trump and that nasty little girl went on a march



#winning

yep :hehe:

Absolutely.

She neither 'put him in his place' nor 'ended him' and she did not even cause him to pause or falter. She just merely shouted over him and tried to stop him speaking.

Where has she said she was an Obama fan though? Piers is an idiot

That's an accurate description of Piers Morgan if I've ever saw one

Actually if you watch back, it's Piers asking her a question and then talking over her as tries to answer, he starts that whole talking over thing

I don't think anyone puts Piers in his place ,lol,I would hate to be interviewed by him, but I do like to watch him.

this

Is this a joke? Piers was the one who shouted over and interrupted her :umm2: and he clearly didn't even listen to what she was saying, he kept blabbering on about how much she 'loves Obama' even though she said repeatedly she doesn't

"im a communist"


:laugh2:


sure you are luv

yeah piers did I'm glad Ash was there to put him in his place
you've literally just described Piers Morgan's interviewing style :laugh:

Susana was LIVING for it :laugh:

trash tv :shrug:

Yes revenge from her

thing is before Piers saved GMB no one would have made a thread about it. Now its all over youtube and forums and the viewing figs are through the roof


The Piers effect


:clap1:

Correct LT

Yep, that's his entire shtick. Ridiculous manchild.

Not a piers fan but that whiney girl was more annoying than him.

All of those are traits of Piers Morgan but you think that xx

Piers is a moron who shouts over everyone but his beloved Trump. The fact that he was just shouting over her about Obama when she was trying to explain that she was opposed to that. She referred to her other work to refute his idiotic argument and he just spoke over her.

Anyone that thinks she was in the wrong in this clip can't see the forest for the trees. He wasn't listening, he was pushing the narrative he wanted to push although she had derailed that narrative and he wasn't letting her speak. Unforgivable and unprofessional behavior from a host or an interviewer. You can't try to challenge someone's views and then scream over their rebuttal.

It's funny how people who seem to disagree with the march found her to be in the wrong but speaking over guests and presenting falsities to discredit themm and not letting them speak is perfectly fine behaviour?

I'm no fan of Piers Morgan, but put in his place? I think he probably sh1ts bigger than her.

Also how the behaviour she's being criticised for is behaviour piers exhibits in almost every interview he does

I disagree, she completely showed him up to be the wailing fool he is. He kept bleating on about Obama when she was telling him she disagreed with that too and the whole 'you can't protest this without protesting something else' angle is a way to undercut people's right to protest. It's especially silly when she opposed Obama on that issue as well.

Piers was just doing the usual Piers ****, screeching his own narrative while ignoring the facts.

The fact he tried to deflect the issue and it backfired so he just stuck his fingers in his ears for the rest of the interview. "Your hero Obama" embarrassing :skull:

Pretty much

I expect piers is fed up of silly mouthpieces like her and can see straight through her

i know i could

He's very petulant for a 50 odd year old.

They both did, and

They both did this, too.

Anyone who claims otherwise on either side is not being objective. Simple as that.

I think you'll find I said, "it's Piers asking her a question and then talking over her as tries to answer, he starts that whole talking over thing" Which i think is an accurate account of what happened, he's supposed to be the interviewer aswell therefore it's his fault that in the end we couldn't hear what either was saying, he asked her a question and then talked all over her as she was trying to answer the question he just asked her and it snow balled from there into a mess of both of them trying to speak. I can understand why she started doing it back to him, I would find it so so annoying if I wasn't being allowed have my say too

I agree with that.

She was the one invited on to be interviewed. He was in control of the conversation so therefore it was down to him to allow her the chance to answer the questions he was asking.

Was she supposed to sit silently whilst he misrepresented her, insulted her and shouted at her and not be able to respond?

She showed him up tbh to be the biased, petulant guy that he is who wouldn't let facts get in the way of his unsupported ideas about large groups of people.

"You don't like Trump? Oh that's impossible you must be a blind Obama supporter! But wait she was critical of Obama so now I'll just shout over her and hope the TV cameras didn't pick that up. I'm right and everything I believe is right regardless of facts or research! As for protests! You either protest absolutely everything across the world or you protest nothing! Not for any reason! Just because! Then I'll go and be given literally the only UK interview with the POTUS and I won't use my time wisely I'll waste it asking him about the cool stuff on his private plane and read out the dinner menu as though the viewers give a sh*t!"

The man is an embarrassment to journalism. As if we didn't already know that from when he ran a trashy tabloid.

Gutter trash.