ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Teacher accused of sex with schoolboy says claims are like a 'weird porn film' (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=348826)

michael21 04-10-2018 07:55 PM

Teacher accused of sex with schoolboy says claims are like a 'weird porn film'
 
https://news.sky.com/story/teacher-a...-film-11517350

She going to jail :cheer2:

montblanc 04-10-2018 07:59 PM

she's full of ****e

Crimson Dynamo 04-10-2018 08:09 PM

And all the holidays

michael21 04-10-2018 08:16 PM

The kid must have sh it parents

bots 04-10-2018 08:44 PM

she doesnt appear to be entirely stable

michael21 04-10-2018 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 10266696)
she doesnt appear to be entirely stable

I agree she should not be allowed near kids

Oliver_W 04-10-2018 09:09 PM

Even if she didn't have any sexual contact with him, the fact she provably spoke to him multiple times via phone shows she's not suitable to work with kids - yes, be chatty and cordial to those without friends, let them eat lunch in the class if you're in there and they're lonely etc, but to think of them as actual friends is just weird. Even if she's found 'innocent' she should be barred from working with children, in my opinion.
I think she's guilty as hell, and manipulated a vulnerable child.

michael21 04-10-2018 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 10266776)
Even if she didn't have any sexual contact with him, the fact she provably spoke to him multiple times via phone shows she's not suitable to work with kids - yes, be chatty and cordial to those without friends, let them eat lunch in the class if you're in there and they're lonely etc, but to think of them as actual friends is just weird. Even if she's found 'innocent' she should be barred from working with children, in my opinion.
I think she's guilty as hell, and manipulated a vulnerable child.

She had no friends

Good she evil

Livia 05-10-2018 08:55 AM

I'm worried about the course all this is taking. The trial isn't even over and you've all made up your mind she's either weird or guilty or both.

Hope no one on here is ever wrongly arrested.

Livia 05-10-2018 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21 (Post 10266793)
She had no friends

Good she evil


I miss the OLD serious debates.

Livia 05-10-2018 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 10266776)
Even if she didn't have any sexual contact with him, the fact she provably spoke to him multiple times via phone shows she's not suitable to work with kids - yes, be chatty and cordial to those without friends, let them eat lunch in the class if you're in there and they're lonely etc, but to think of them as actual friends is just weird. Even if she's found 'innocent' she should be barred from working with children, in my opinion.
I think she's guilty as hell, and manipulated a vulnerable child.

No one is ever found "innocent". And that's quite a skill, Oliver, to be able to reach a verdict based on so little.

If she is found not guilty, what legislation are you going to use to stop her working with kids?

Better wait till the trial is over.

Crimson Dynamo 05-10-2018 09:01 AM

"During the seven months after the school trip there were 339 contacts between the two on the boy's mobile phone, which consisted of 295 text messages, 23 calls, 13 calls that went straight to answer phone and eight multimedia messages."

whether she shagged him or not

that is unacceptable

Livia 05-10-2018 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10267508)
"During the seven months after the school trip there were 339 contacts between the two on the boy's mobile phone, which consisted of 295 text messages, 23 calls, 13 calls that went straight to answer phone and eight multimedia messages."

whether she shagged him or not

that is unacceptable

What was the nature of the texts? Until we know, I couldn't comment.

Niamh. 05-10-2018 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10267508)
"During the seven months after the school trip there were 339 contacts between the two on the boy's mobile phone, which consisted of 295 text messages, 23 calls, 13 calls that went straight to answer phone and eight multimedia messages."

whether she shagged him or not

that is unacceptable

Yeah have to agree with that. I would be out for her blood if that was my son. It's particularly bad when it's a teacher, you're supposed to feel like your kids are safe when they're at school

Livia 05-10-2018 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10267515)
Yeah have to agree with that. I would be out for her blood if that was my son. It's particularly bad when it's a teacher, you're supposed to feel like your kids are safe when they're at school

She sounds like a bloody fool. I'm not sure that makes her guilty.

Niamh. 05-10-2018 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10267520)
She sounds like a bloody fool. I'm not sure that makes her guilty.

She sounds like she over stepped the boundries atleast from the information that's actually fact and certainly crossed the line of professional conduct towards a student. I would be extremely uncomfortable with that kind of contact between one of my kids and their teacher

Livia 05-10-2018 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10267523)
She sounds like she over stepped the boundries atleast from the information that's actually fact and certainly crossed the line of professional conduct towards a student. I would be extremely uncomfortable with that kind of contact between one of my kids and their teacher

I still think we're getting the edited and salacious highlights. I'd be very interested to hear from the boy and also his parents. How old is he? Do we know?

Anyhoo, I'll be very interested to see the verdict.

Oliver_W 05-10-2018 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10267512)
What was the nature of the texts? Until we know, I couldn't comment.

Doesn't matter. There are boundaries in place for adults who work with children, and whatever the content of the texts, be it flirting or merely talking about Emmerdale, it's inappropriate.

Niamh. 05-10-2018 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 10267539)
Doesn't matter. There are boundaries in place for adults who work with children, and whatever the content of the texts, be it flirting or merely talking about Emmerdale, it's inappropriate.

Exactly. Also, teachers, I'm sure are aware of all this, if they were texting about some sort of a problem he was having, I'm pretty sure she would have had to make someone aware of the contact between them, her principal or someone. Just so it's all being noted and is above board

Redway 05-10-2018 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21 (Post 10266793)
She had no friends

Good she evil

LMAO.

Babayaro. 05-10-2018 10:56 AM

6"2??

:eyes:

Crimson Dynamo 05-10-2018 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babayaro. (Post 10267653)
6"2??

:eyes:

and in a Airline toilet? :eyes:

Niamh. 05-10-2018 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10267656)
and in a Airline toilet? :eyes:

Case closed? :laugh:

Babayaro. 05-10-2018 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10267656)
and in a Airline toilet? :eyes:

Nnn

Could've been a blowy?

Crimson Dynamo 05-10-2018 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babayaro. (Post 10267663)
Nnn

Could've been a blowy?

No the accusation is full blown intercourse

Babayaro. 05-10-2018 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10267665)
No the accusation is full blown intercourse

:hehe:

Nicky91 05-10-2018 11:04 AM

this is gross, poor children who had this vile woman as their teacher

Crimson Dynamo 05-10-2018 11:05 AM

to be fair when I was 16 all I could think about was banging the hot teachers

Babayaro. 05-10-2018 11:09 AM

This reminds me


I swear I saw a pedo music teacher from my school in home bargains yesterday

Oliver_W 05-10-2018 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babayaro. (Post 10267681)
This reminds me


I swear I saw a pedo music teacher from my school in home bargains yesterday

Was he actually though?

Babayaro. 05-10-2018 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 10267685)
Was he actually though?

Yes he was literally jailed

Crimson Dynamo 05-10-2018 11:27 AM

bound to be a PE teacher

Oliver_W 05-10-2018 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babayaro. (Post 10267696)
Yes he was literally jailed

Scumbag

Marsh. 05-10-2018 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10267512)
What was the nature of the texts? Until we know, I couldn't comment.

Tbh, the nature of the texts doesn't matter. It's not appropriate for a teacher to have such personal contact with a pupil. One of the more obvious reasons being protecting herself from such accusations as this. Calling the pupil a "friend" is overstepping the boundaries of a teacher/pupil relationship.

Marsh. 05-10-2018 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10267545)
Exactly. Also, teachers, I'm sure are aware of all this, if they were texting about some sort of a problem he was having, I'm pretty sure she would have had to make someone aware of the contact between them, her principal or someone. Just so it's all being noted and is above board

Even then it wouldn't be allowed and she'd be advised to keep the contact during school hours, at school and verbal. Not this personal exchange of phone numbers.

Most schools now, the teachers aren't even allowed to add the parents on Facebook/Twitter, never mind the kids. Which is fair enough, it can get in the way of the professional boundaries.

Livia 05-10-2018 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 10267539)
Doesn't matter. There are boundaries in place for adults who work with children, and whatever the content of the texts, be it flirting or merely talking about Emmerdale, it's inappropriate.

Niamh said she would be worried if it was one of her kids. The trouble is, not all mothers are like Niamh; if they were, I'd have nothing more to say.

What if the texts weren't discussing school nor soaps... what if he was saying, "I want to kill myself"? or "My father is abusing me and I'm afraid to speak to anyone officially". We don't know the context of any of this.

I'm not saying this woman is innocent, I'm saying none of us can come to a conclusion on so little evidence. So I'll be interested to hear more about it and eventually know the verdict.

Livia 05-10-2018 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10267736)
Tbh, the nature of the texts doesn't matter. It's not appropriate for a teacher to have such personal contact with a pupil. One of the more obvious reasons being protecting herself from such accusations as this. Calling the pupil a "friend" is overstepping the boundaries of a teacher/pupil relationship.

See my post above, Marshy x

Marsh. 05-10-2018 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10267866)
What if the texts weren't discussing school nor soaps... what if he was saying, "I want to kill myself"? or "My father is abusing me and I'm afraid to speak to anyone officially". We don't know the context of any of this.

There are procedures for things like this and there would be a record of her discussing this with a senior colleague at the school, surely?

Thing is, such discussions about things like that would have had to have started in school and face-to-face before the exchange of numbers. No professional teacher's response to a child confiding in them about suicidal thoughts or abuse at home would be to give them their personal mobile number. There is no context for it to be appropriate for a teacher to give a child their personal contact information.

Unless said characters are main characters in Waterloo Road that is. :hehe:

Livia 05-10-2018 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10267901)
There are procedures for things like this and there would be a record of her discussing this with a senior colleague at the school, surely?

Thing is, such discussions about things like that would have had to have started in school and face-to-face before the exchange of numbers. No professional teacher's response to a child confiding in them about suicidal thoughts or abuse at home would be to give them their personal mobile number. There is no context for it to be appropriate for a teacher to give a child their personal contact information.

Unless said characters are main characters in Waterloo Road that is. :hehe:

Maybe it did start in school face to face. Maybe she wrongly assumed she could help him and didn't want to break his confidence. Maybe she gave him her number so he had someone to turn to. I can't find someone guilty without knowing ALL the facts and extenuating circumstances.

Or.... There may be no extenuating circumstances and she's a monster, preying on young boys. We don't know.

That's all I'm saying. If we could reach a watertight conclusion by reading an edited article, I could have save myself about four or five years of study.

That's all I'm saying, Marshy.

Marsh. 05-10-2018 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10267916)
Maybe it did start in school face to face. Maybe she wrongly assumed she could help him and didn't want to break his confidence. Maybe she gave him her number so he had someone to turn to. I can't find someone guilty without knowing ALL the facts and extenuating circumstances.

Or.... There may be no extenuating circumstances and she's a monster, preying on young boys. We don't know.

That's all I'm saying. If we could reach a watertight conclusion by reading an edited article, I could have save myself about four or five years of study.

That's all I'm saying, Marshy.

No, hang on. I'm not saying this is evidence that she's a monster or a molester or anything of the sort. I'm saying even WITHOUT any inappropriate sexual relationship, even if it was a perfectly ordinary exchange of messages, it is not appropriate and crosses the boundaries of a teacher/pupil relationship.

There are no extenuating circumstances. Not one.

There's a difference between not breaking his confidence, and giving him your personal contact information. Any sane person knows that.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.