ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   House of Lords approve LGBT inclusive relations and sex education (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=356123)

Smithy 25-04-2019 07:57 PM

House of Lords approve LGBT inclusive relations and sex education
 
Quote:

The House of Lords has given its backing to new LGBT-inclusive guidance on compulsory relationships and sex education in English schools.

The upper chamber gave approval to new government guidance on relationships and sex education late on Wednesday (April 24), a month after the plan passed through the House of Commons by a vote of 538 to 21.

The new guidance is clear on the teaching about LGBT relationships expected in secondary schools and encouraged in primary while retaining the flexibility for head teachers to respond to the needs of their own schools.”

Gay peer Lord Scriven reveals he ‘considered suicide’ as a teenager

In a moving speech during the debate, gay Liberal Democrat peer Lord Scriven revealed he contemplated suicide as a teenager due to homophobia, and said he hopes the new LGBT-inclusive guidance helps others like him.

He said: “A lot has been spoken about the theory of relationships education, and people coming to terms with who they are and understanding the modern world.

“I was one of those 15 year olds who looked over the edge and contemplated suicide. Stories about the real world are far more important than theory.”
:clap1::clap1:

TomC 25-04-2019 08:24 PM

thank **** for that. can you see which mps opposed?

TomC 25-04-2019 08:33 PM

ahhh was hasty, i see the house of commons voted last month. i really wanted another reason to drag my Tory MP ugh

Twosugars 25-04-2019 09:49 PM

What about that Muslim school protest then?

Oliver_W 25-04-2019 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 10530029)
What about that Muslim school protest then?

Help them build a bridge to get over it?

Liam- 25-04-2019 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 10530029)
What about that Muslim school protest then?

They’ll all be fined and their kids suspended if they carry on I should hope

arista 26-04-2019 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 10530029)
What about that Muslim school protest then?


That Goes On.
Not Resolved.

arista 26-04-2019 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 10530039)
They’ll all be fined and their kids suspended if they carry on I should hope


No there is far to many of them
until it gets back on the news
nothing has changed

Marsh. 26-04-2019 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 10530345)
No there is far to many of them
until it gets back on the news
nothing has changed

There's far too many criminals in general, they all get punished though.

Livia 26-04-2019 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomC (Post 10529840)
ahhh was hasty, i see the house of commons voted last month. i really wanted another reason to drag my Tory MP ugh

While you're dragging a Tory, remember that it was the Tories who brought in gay marriage, against the wishes of quite a lot of their members.

Underscore 26-04-2019 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10530492)
While you're dragging a Tory, remember that it was the Tories who brought in gay marriage, against the wishes of quite a lot of their members.

It was actually a Lib Dem promise which the Tories are shamefully claiming.

Lynne Featherstone is widely credited as bringing in SSM

Crimson Dynamo 26-04-2019 09:19 AM

while retaining the flexibility for head teachers to respond to the needs of their own schools...

oh

Livia 26-04-2019 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Underscore (Post 10530496)
It was actually a Lib Dem promise which the Tories are shamefully claiming.

Lynne Featherstone brought in SSM

A LibDem promise, don't make me laugh. The LibDems promised a lot of things... none of which they would have been able to get through had they not got into bed with the Conservative Party... an act that just about finished them off.

The Tories aren't "shamefully claiming" anything, they were in a coalition with the LibDems, and there's no way in this world or the next that the LibDems would ever have been in a position of power alone, to be able to push through a law. It was the Tory party who got it through, no amount of denial is going to change that. A large percentage of their old dyed-in-the-wool Tory members resigned their membership over it, and to give them their due, they pushed it through regardless.

Livia 26-04-2019 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10530500)
while retaining the flexibility for head teachers to respond to the needs of their own schools...

oh

No head teacher should overrule this, but I'm guessing in places with a lot of Muslims, they're going to cave.

Cherie 26-04-2019 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10530500)
while retaining the flexibility for head teachers to respond to the needs of their own schools...

oh



this covers the recent protest in Birmingham nicely I guess?

Crimson Dynamo 26-04-2019 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10530506)
this covers the recent protest in Birmingham nicely I guess?

seems like a rather large and spacious loophole

Underscore 26-04-2019 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10530503)
A LibDem promise, don't make me laugh. The LibDems promised a lot of things... none of which they would have been able to get through had they not got into bed with the Conservative Party... an act that just about finished them off.

The Tories aren't "shamefully claiming" anything, they were in a coalition with the LibDems, and there's no way in this world or the next that the LibDems would ever have been in a position of power alone, to be able to push through a law. It was the Tory party who got it through, no amount of denial is going to change that. A large percentage of their old dyed-in-the-wool Tory members resigned their membership over it, and to give them their due, they pushed it through regardless.

The Conservatives did not have it in their 2010 manifesto. The Lib Dems did. If the Lib Dems had not forced their hand, the Tories would not have held a vote because of their members.

Also 'Featherstone launched the consultation by the UK Government on introducing same-sex marriage and was the first politician to take part in the Out4Marriage campaign'

ALSO: Conservatives wouldn't have got it through alone, not by a long shot. 117 Tories voted FOR it, and 127 voted AGAINST it. The Conservative parliamentary party were AGAINST it. It wasn't the Tory party that got it through by a long shot. It was half the Tories and the vast majority of opposition MPs. So if anything, it was a cross party consensus... But facts are facts, there's no evidence there would've been a vote without the Lib Dems in coalition.

Smithy 26-04-2019 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10530492)
While you're dragging a Tory, remember that it was the Tories who brought in gay marriage, against the wishes of quite a lot of their members.

Well... you said it :shrug:

TomC 26-04-2019 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10530492)
While you're dragging a Tory, remember that it was the Tories who brought in gay marriage, against the wishes of quite a lot of their members.

Hmm funny that bc most of the MPs that opposed this legislation were Tories and DUP

Cherie 26-04-2019 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10530507)
seems like a rather large and spacious loophole

If you are serious about inclusion there should be no wriggle room on it.

There are core subjects that every school has to adhere to, why not this

Twosugars 26-04-2019 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 10530515)
Well... you said it :shrug:

:laugh:

Withano 26-04-2019 12:19 PM

538 to 21? Who were the 21? DUP and tories I’m guessing?

Denver 26-04-2019 12:21 PM

Just get rid of sex ed its pointless

Withano 26-04-2019 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Underscore (Post 10530512)
The Conservatives did not have it in their 2010 manifesto. The Lib Dems did. If the Lib Dems had not forced their hand, the Tories would not have held a vote because of their members.

Also 'Featherstone launched the consultation by the UK Government on introducing same-sex marriage and was the first politician to take part in the Out4Marriage campaign'

ALSO: Conservatives wouldn't have got it through alone, not by a long shot. 117 Tories voted FOR it, and 127 voted AGAINST it. The Conservative parliamentary party were AGAINST it. It wasn't the Tory party that got it through by a long shot. It was half the Tories and the vast majority of opposition MPs. So if anything, it was a cross party consensus... But facts are facts, there's no evidence there would've been a vote without the Lib Dems in coalition.


:clap1:

Withano 26-04-2019 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 10530614)
538 to 21? Who were the 21? DUP and tories I’m guessing?

12 tories
7 dups
1 labour
1 independent
(20 men, 1 woman)

In case anybody else was wondering

Gross *****

Cherie 26-04-2019 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam. (Post 10530618)
Just get rid of sex ed its pointless

Teenage pregnancies are on the decrease, so I would say it is finally working

Morgan. 26-04-2019 12:33 PM

Sex ed in schools is needed. It's the fact it's going into later education. I found my class of 17-21 year olds the other week in sex ed and let me tell you it was just embarrassing.

Tom4784 26-04-2019 12:55 PM

Good, learning that LGBT people are no different to anyone else is vital and all schools should be made to teach inclusive lessons. I wouldn't have put in any loopholes to appease religious people, if they don't like it they can protest and get fined for it. Using religion to justify hatred should never be something that's protected.

As for the assertion by Adam that sex education is pointless.... Are you ****ing serious? Go look at the US stats of STI diagnosis rates and teen pregnancy numbers in places where sex education is optional, isn't taught at all or preaches abstinence and compare them to places that teach sex education properly as a compulsory class and see the difference.

Having no sex education puts people at risk, to make out that it's pointless is so incredibly ignorant on your part.

Tom4784 26-04-2019 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Underscore (Post 10530512)
The Conservatives did not have it in their 2010 manifesto. The Lib Dems did. If the Lib Dems had not forced their hand, the Tories would not have held a vote because of their members.

Also 'Featherstone launched the consultation by the UK Government on introducing same-sex marriage and was the first politician to take part in the Out4Marriage campaign'

ALSO: Conservatives wouldn't have got it through alone, not by a long shot. 117 Tories voted FOR it, and 127 voted AGAINST it. The Conservative parliamentary party were AGAINST it. It wasn't the Tory party that got it through by a long shot. It was half the Tories and the vast majority of opposition MPs. So if anything, it was a cross party consensus... But facts are facts, there's no evidence there would've been a vote without the Lib Dems in coalition.

:clap1:

The Tories were never going to have the numbers in their own party to pass SSM and doing so would go against the wishes of the majority.

To claim that the Tories were responsible for SSM is a gross attempt to rewrite history in order to make the tories look good when they were actually the main opposition to it.

Denver 26-04-2019 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10530686)
Good, learning that LGBT people are no different to anyone else is vital and all schools should be made to teach inclusive lessons. I wouldn't have put in any loopholes to appease religious people, if they don't like it they can protest and get fined for it. Using religion to justify hatred should never be something that's protected.

As for the assertion by Adam that sex education is pointless.... Are you ****ing serious? Go look at the US stats of STI diagnosis rates and teen pregnancy numbers in places where sex education is optional, isn't taught at all or preaches abstinence and compare them to places that teach sex education properly as a compulsory class and see the difference.

Having no sex education puts people at risk, to make out that it's pointless is so incredibly ignorant on your part.

It should be the parents job first and foremost, parents need to start teaching children certain things and stop leaving it to schools

Tom4784 26-04-2019 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam. (Post 10530697)
It should be the parents job first and foremost, parents need to start teaching children certain things and stop leaving it to schools

Ridiculous.

You'd rather kids not go through a course which is tailor made to keep them safe so that their parents opt not to teach their kids to be safe or give them bad advice?

What is the logic behind your argument because I don't see any.

Underscore 26-04-2019 02:20 PM

Like I am glad the Tories agreed to hold a vote (not that they had a choice) but to claim it was them who passed it is just wrong

Marsh. 26-04-2019 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam. (Post 10530618)
Just get rid of sex ed its pointless

:umm2:

Marsh. 26-04-2019 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam. (Post 10530697)
It should be the parents job first and foremost, parents need to start teaching children certain things and stop leaving it to schools

Let's close the schools altogether and just have all parents homeschool ALL of their kids. You know.... just because.

Oliver_W 26-04-2019 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam. (Post 10530697)
It should be the parents job first and foremost, parents need to start teaching children certain things and stop leaving it to schools

That would work REALLY well in places like Birmingham, Luton...

AnnieK 26-04-2019 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam. (Post 10530697)
It should be the parents job first and foremost, parents need to start teaching children certain things and stop leaving it to schools

Whilst I agree that parent's should have a major input into this, school's also need to provide sex ed as there are many parent's who won't broach the subject with their kids, for many reasons. If kids are taught core aspects of sex ed at school those whose parent's won't talk to them at home will have at least some knowledge and information.

chuff me dizzy 26-04-2019 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam. (Post 10530697)
It should be the parents job first and foremost, parents need to start teaching children certain things and stop leaving it to schools

Totally agree, its the parents place to decide what their child needs to learn about sex /lgbt education and at what age, if they are not happy with the schools plan, don't let their child go in to the lesson

Withano 26-04-2019 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 10530872)
Totally agree, its the parents place to decide what their child needs to learn about sex /lgbt education and at what age, if they are not happy with the schools plan, don't let their child go in to the lesson

Since when was its the parents place to decide school curriculum lol. Literally never.

Tom4784 26-04-2019 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 10530872)
Totally agree, its the parents place to decide what their child needs to learn about sex /lgbt education and at what age, if they are not happy with the schools plan, don't let their child go in to the lesson

What a selfish parent they would be to place their own biases above the needs of their own child. Ignorance is never better than knowledge.

Wizard. 26-04-2019 03:39 PM

We also need to teach secondary school students of the appropriate age about gay sex. I had a lot of unprotected sex stupidly because I wasn't even aware of HIV or anything because all they talked about were using condoms to stop pregnancy and chlamydia.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.