Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014250)

The 56-year-old also admitted that she has no sympathy for Meghan, 39,
who revealed during the shocking interview that she battled suicidal thoughts
during her time as a royal - instead accusing the Duchess of using her
'depression as an excuse for treating people like dishrags'

What a disgusting thing to say. How on earth would she know that anyway, she hasn't seen her in what was it? 13 years.....she has proof of that too :hee:

Also, I haven't seen her in 20 years, isn't a massive lie when the figure is instead 13, give over :laugh:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11014256)

top rated comment:


Samantha Markle we the British public are sorry,you were right all along!

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11014256)

top rated comment:


Samantha Markle we the British public are sorry,you were right all along!

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11014259)

a 7 year exaggeration for effect

i wonder what other huge exaggerations were in there....

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11014280)

the whole sorry saga has been "he said she said" from the beginning, like a crowd of school kids. I find the whole thing unbelievably tedious

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014276)

No it isn't I've often said, I haven't seen him in a hundred years - I haven't even been alive 100 years (contrary to popular belief)

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11014284)

yes but that is a normal exaggeration as noone has so its used to represent a standard long time

20 years is a specific time and it was a downright lie for effect to sensasionalise

also saying her actual sister was trying to cash in on her fame by changing her name was a nasty lie

again to hurt and damage

what a piece of work - your own father and sister call you out in one day

cripes:shocked:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014291)

hhhmmm I don't know 20 years is also just a round figure when you know you haven't seen a person in a long time but maybe don't remember exactly how long ago it was.

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 11014273)

Of course it is on the daily mail where racism is rife

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11014280)

the whole sorry saga has been "he said she said" from the beginning, like a crowd of school kids. I find the whole thing unbelievably tedious

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11014295)

A lot closer to 10 though..:laugh:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 11014312)

Makes me scream that yesterday Meghan and Harry were being dragged for airing their family’s dirty laundry but today Meghans sister is being taken as gospel and lauded

Make it make sense Meghan haters!

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11014313)

Right back at you

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 11014314)

Tibbs first self confessed Meghan hater?

Congrats Cherrie :clap1:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11014244)

Meghan Markle's half-sister Samantha SLAMS her Oprah interview, accusing

Duchess of using 'depression as an excuse to treat people like dishrags' - and

firing back at her claim that they haven't seen each other in 20 years

• Samantha, 56, who shares a father, Thomas, with Meghan, 39, unleashed a furious rant against her half-sister in the wake of her bombshell Oprah interview
  
• On Monday morning, new clips from the interview showed Meghan discussing her relationship with her father and Samantha
  
• She accused her dad of 'betraying her' and said that her half-sister Samantha 'doesn't know her' and claimed they haven't seen each other in 20 years
  
• Samantha shared proof to refute this claim, sharing images of herself and Meghan at her college graduation 13 years ago
  
• Meghan also claimed in the interview clips that Samantha only changed her name back to Markle when her half-sister began dating Harry
  
• Samantha shared evidence to the contrary, revealing that she filed a petition to change her last name to Markle in December 1997
  
• When asked about Meghan's admission that she struggled with suicidal thoughts, Samantha accused her of using her mental health as 'an excuse'
  
• 'Depression is not an excuse for treating people like dishrags and disposing of them,' she said of her half-sibling's struggle
  

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/03...5246422508.jpg



Meghan Markle's half-sister Samantha has slammed the royal's bombshell

interview with Oprah Winfrey, saying 'the truth was totally ignored and

omitted' while providing photos and documents to disprove each of the

Duchess of Sussex's claims about her.



The 56-year-old also admitted that she has no sympathy for Meghan, 39,

who revealed during the shocking interview that she battled suicidal thoughts

during her time as a royal - instead accusing the Duchess of using her

'depression as an excuse for treating people like dishrags'



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...interview.html



Its not looking good for Meghan...

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11014331)

Another, er, inconsistency - Reverend David Green "Its not legal to have your own vows, you can't get married twice.

Meghan "Three days before our wedding, we got married. No - one knows that."

BBC - A spokesperson for the Sussexes' said it was a private exchange of vows
that had been 'incorrectly described' by Meghan.

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014336)

So they did have a private exchange of vows like she said, it wasn't actually a lie? It's just nit picking at how she worded it? fgs

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11014340)

She said 'we got married 3 days before' though, not 'we exchanged private vows' which is a totally different thing as that isn't getting married.
Which made people think her big wedding 3 days later presided over by the Archbishop of Canterbury was a sham.

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014343)

Why would it be a sham? I've been to plenty of weddings where the couple had gotten married a few days earlier in a registry office just for the legal stuff and then had their own ceremonies with all the guests to attend, I never felt I was attending a "sham"

Anyway, what she said actually did happen, she did exchange vows with her husband a few days previous so they could have something personal and private which seems like the point she was making, that actually happened. It's nit picking to say she's lying

Originally Posted by Zizu (Post 11014357)

The palace have just released a statement ... just damage limitation from what I heard ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014343)

Why would it be a sham? I've been to plenty of weddings where the couple had gotten married a few days earlier in a registry office just for the legal stuff and then had their own ceremonies with all the guests to attend, I never felt I was attending a "sham"

Anyway, what she said actually did happen, she did exchange vows with her husband a few days previous so they could have something personal and private which seems like the point she was making, that actually happened. It's nit picking to say she's lying

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11014364)

I thought it was a fair and respectful response.

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014336)

So they did have a private exchange of vows like she said, it wasn't actually a lie? It's just nit picking at how she worded it? fgs

Originally Posted by Zizu (Post 11014385)

That’s what I said ... damage limitation


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11014399)

Meghan and Harry knowingly put the queen in an impossible position. Claim there was racism but not specifically identify the culprit. It means the queen cannot refute it, so the only option given that is that it is and should have remained a private family matter, it was the only line she could take.

They may say they are still much loved, but that certainly wont be true of all the family, they have burnt a lot of bridges that wont be repaired

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 11014262)

No evidence for this at all, just a bitter jealous siblings word

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11014331)

Another, er, inconsistency - Reverend David Green "Its not legal to have your own vows, you can't get married twice.

Meghan "Three days before our wedding, we got married. No - one knows that."

BBC - A spokesperson for the Sussexes' said it was a private exchange of vows
that had been 'incorrectly described' by Meghan.