Patsy Palmer storms off GMB and refuses to do her interview
 

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/03...5969976221.jpg
[Patsy Palmer refused to take part in a
Good Morning Britain interview live
on air after she saw they had
branded her 'addict to wellness guru'
on Wednesday.

The furious star, 48, said she didn't
appreciate being referred to as
an 'addict' because it was 'years ago',
before abruptly leaving the virtual chat.]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/03...5969864310.jpg


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...ter_mailonline


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/03...5969869710.jpg

Patsy providing the drama :clap1: Piss already forgotten.

Them trying to make her interview about Meghan and Harry. :facepalm:

The obsession.

...not sure that I understand any of the wellness guru stuff that she was offended by...there’s enough in Eastenders storylines without trying to follow outside of that as well...

Who’s she ****ing to live in Malibu?

I thought it was because "Addict" was written on the screen, she seemed upset about her past being brought up . But wasn't she there to talk about her book :conf: .

If I had to talk to Susannah Reid I’d probably do the same so I don’t even blame her

Good on her for having none of it!

She did but before she noticed the caption they were asking her "Do you get as much privacy as Harry and Meghan claim?"

Patsy Palmer, who isn't famous in America, probably does get loads of privacy. It was an awful attempt at getting Harry and Meghan back into the discussion. The show is the pits.

Apparently she wrote about her addiction issues in a book 15 years ago and they randomly stuck "addict" in the tag when it didn't relate to what she was being interviewed about.

:joker:

It was the "Addict" tag she took issue with.

Ohh
I didn't realise they asked her that at first , yeah I'd imagine it's easier for Patsy in America as she's a UK soap star . So totally different to Meghan and Harry,so a bit pointless for them to ask her that :rolleyes: .

they should have got the weatherman on to tell Patsy what she is thinking and why she did nthings years ago...


:skull:

Ben and Susannah's faces :laugh:

Good for you Patsy :clap1:

Trust ITV to try and find a way to bring Harry and Meghan into the discussion like... why? :laugh:. It just seems well random for them to ask her a question like that.

It’s just really crap journalism at the end of the day, the “addict” tag line, they’ve always gotta get a dig in somehow so I’m glad she stood up for herself.

Are you kidding?:laugh:

Nothing from GMB will ever beat their peak topic that we all need to talk about as it's a concerning issue in this country.

Look below:

people are fed up with these supposed news programs. I can't stomach any of them

Isn't that the woman who was arrested at the vigil on Sunday?

Good for her.

If they did he'd get it right judging by his record of destroying Piss Morgan

...I wish that my COVID hair looked like Patsy’s...she looks amazing...:lovedup:...

Yes...Good for her. It takes courage to do that.

:clap1: strong people know when to walk away from things they're not comfortable with, I completely agree.

Exactly TS,

https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-p...%3A839%2Csmart

He walked from a sinking ship and now he has the world at his feet

Poor sacked old man.

Piers embarrassed himself by storming off in a huff more like :hee: .

With his 20 million fortune. God help him. :bawling:

Honestly, I would’ve had no idea she used to be an addict had she not brought attention to it by doing this.

Streisand Effect.

I agree again, Piers' world is certainly at his feet. Someone pass him the superglue :worry:

Well colour me shocked that you put emphasis on money.

He could have billions and it wouldn't change the embarrassment he is to the public.

Only most of the public agreed with him, they don't like her either. :laugh:
Piers putting his finger up to the tiresome virtue signallers and their gullible and wokey emotions when they go all fragile at Meghan speaking her ‘truth’. How dare he be allowed free speech like our Megsie, cancel him! :fan:

I didn't ask for more diatribe and a repeat of your complete misunderstanding of what free speech actually is and what it entails.

Educate yourself then come back.

But 2 New Channels
in News, can hire him.

I don't understand how people can flat out ignore things that there is actual documented video evidence of. You know Piers liked Meghan (quite a lot), there's multiple videos of his saying how much he liked her. You know he was hurt/upset by her "cutting him off" and not speaking to him any more - there are multiple videos of him admitting that... And then you know he, following that, had a disproportionately passionate dislike of her verging on obsession. But some people won't concede that these things are obviously linked?

H... How does one lie to themself like that?

...is it that Meghan ‘cut him off’ as such, their worlds probably didn’t collide ...all of the stuff that I’ve read have said that he felt that he was ‘owed’ an invite to the wedding and didn’t get one...some kind of sense of entitlement for whatever reason in his head...

I mean she might have, but the idea is that she "met a better prospect" (than this older married man :umm2: ) and so gave him the cold shoulder even as a friend, when surely the sudden distance could just as easily be explained by her getting together with Harry, and Harry privately being clear about his dislike of the UK press from the outset. Piers Morgan has practically been the avatar of British Pressness for many years.

...yeah, it has to be said that Piers represents so much that Harry is completely repulsed by in terms of media, I hadn’t actually thought of it like that before...for Piers to see it like that, though and not ‘oh she’s just ghosted me, horrid woman...’...etc...he would actually have to hold a mirror to himself, wouldn’t he...bullying and controlling seems more in line with his personality...

good for her