![]() |
Weds 31st Live Ch5HD Keir Starmer on Jeremy Vine 9:15AM
|
Live Starmer Now
Until 9:45AM No one else Just Starmer and Vine |
Starmer is happy for Liz Truss
To take any of his plan |
First Caller
Nationalization is needed Starmer points out it is better to lower the costs fast. |
Great Vine
now showing an Angry Clip from Owen Jones. Starmer is not focused on Owen |
Another Live Caller
Standing Charges, Starmer will have a look at that. https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/09...2149154242.jpg |
Thats it
just 25mins |
It was worth doing
Starmer and Vine The questions were great one 68 old lady thinks it will keep going up. Starmer confirmed his plan is fully costed until April 2023 and he would have another plan right after that. |
|
|
On Ch5+1 now
|
|
I watched it arista ,all that came across to me is his constant saying " I want to be the next PM", no real solutions to anything, but we will see.
|
what he is basically saying is the country can't afford to nationalise all the industries he wants to. After all, it has to be funded by the people and we ain't got any money :laugh:
|
He also would not stand by the strikers, I don't think he said it directly but he said he would not join them.
|
i've been saying it for a bit now that i think the probability of riots is pretty high. If Keir joined the picket lines then he would be associated with any rioting that happens by default. My guess is that is the reason he doesn't want to be associated with the strikes
|
|
Quote:
Obviously for folks like me, that's a massive issue, but not for Tories. |
I know people like to mock O-J, but he is 100% correct in that clip, and he works at the Guardian, so he definitely was not a cheerleader for Corbyn. Starmer, actually was, though.
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Has he said why he isn't, btw? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He's scrapped his energy nationalisation pledge, which would cost £2-5billion, in favour of freezing prices and paying energy companies over £30billion instead, besides the only policy he's offered being a reduction of business taxes. He stands against workers, and gives interviews to the sun when saying he never would. |
Quote:
But the Sun thing? I don't really see why trying to reach working class people should be a problem? Sure he said he never would, but politicians do things they say they wouldn't, or vice versa, all the time. |
I can take Starmer's point that unless you win power then you cannot do anything.
So I accept it has to be at least seen to be, if not to actually do so, that after 2 election defeats on virtual identical manifestos to be going back to the drawing board. However going back to the drawing board should not necessarily mean you dispose of the more popular policies of said manifestos. Starmer really infuriates me, he needs to stop the controlled lawyer summing up type of his delivery and get policies he can show real passion for. I'm annoyed he pussyfoots around the current strikes issues. He SHOULD lead properly and say he backs them. Furthermore, one of the most popular policies Corbyn DARED to include again in a Labour manifesto. Re-nationalisation of gas and electricity. It is now reported that even Con voters now support this more than not. His short term fix of freezing the energy cap for 6 months is a good one, that would get all through the Winter months. Which is also a Lib Dem strongly supported idea of theirs too. Then decide what to do next in assessing the picture post April. However he needs a long term policy and this is where the re-nationalisation of energy is a much more than likely now winner. He should not act like he's ashamed of that policy from the last 2 elections because it was the one most popular from Labour even in 2017. I think it would be even moreso now. So for goodness sake Labour MPs, shake Starmer into reality and persuade him this could and should be his firm way to power now. Andy Burnham has indicated his support to it. Just wake up Starmer for goodness sake. Oh and IF he was to adopt a PR policy too, he'd likely walk an election. I really find Starmer as leader infuriating that he says he's pragmatic on nationalisation. Just take it back on board and stop the avoidance of its merits. |
Quote:
|
He should be backing the strikers and workers.
He shouldn't either be taking action against his MPs who do say they support them and also actively do so. If Liz Gross sets out to limit workers rights or even shockingly sets out to prevent them. Starmer would then be screaming, rightly, how undemocratic and against human rights that was. Yet he has at best shown less than lukewarm sympathy with the very just grievances these workers have. Of which they've been pushed to the limits on and taken strike action. If the party the Unions helped bring into existence hasn't a leader who will stand with them then that's really bad and WRONG. |
It's a difficult one, Keir was always going to be seen as unexciting compared to Boris, but its going to be a totally different dynamic against Liz or Rushi. The odds must still favour a labour government at the next election as long as Keir remains steady
|
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FbhLOtgW...g&name=900x900
Bless Owen doing his Starmer Labour research in that store |
Quote:
It is a great Clip Anger played Direct to Starmer On the Screen in the ITN studio for Live Ch5HD J. Vine and Starmer for 25mins Who Ignores Owen I hope Starmer does the same show again Vine invited him back. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.