If you were a villager, would you let the vampires have a smoke?
 

?

Yea, As a smoker I know how **** it is when you have none/can't

Tho it's amusing to watch

I think I would eventually but I understand them not doing it early on in case the vampires were able to screw them over somehow

Hadn't it only been like 3 and a half hours

Surely the lack of blood would be a bigger cause for concern for a vampire? :fan:

No, f those weaklings

Nope. Let the dirty faggers suffer.

I wouldn’t (which might be shocking as a former smoker) since I couldn’t trust them.

No I'd be afraid it would make me lose

I would have let one of them out, let the other one seeth

No, nathan was quite correct, if the vamps get in, the villagers could lose the task. BB didn't say smoke breaks are ok

Yes, but only one at a time and with two villagers accompanying them to and from the garden.

No f them

I would let them have a smoke break.

Yes, I've never smoked myself but know how worked up smokers can get being used to smoking.
So I wouldn't deprive them of it.

Nope. I've never been particularly sympathetic to smoker's cravings though, not my fault you chose to become a smoker :laugh: I'm one of those who moans about them getting extra breaks at work

…yeah, similar to this, I would …a smoke break itinerary with villager guards…:laugh:…

No definitely not
It’s not the first time bb have screwed house mates over

Some of them are so thick they forget it’s just a game and not personal

I just wouldn’t ask…maybe once but I wouldn’t give them the privilidge to deny me.

..and Tbf the villagers don’t know what it might mean for them to let them in.

I would have just gone for a smoke. What are they gonna do? Physically push me back? Nope.

If it meant punishment for the whole house or failing the task, I would have had two.

I also wouldn't deprive a friend of going for a smoke for that long.

That's how I saw it , I kept thinking the vampires will steal their blood aswell or cheat or something lol .

Yes, because, being a smoker, I know how hard it is. If you don't have one by choice, fine, but for others to take that away from them doesn't really take their feelings into account. I would have smashed that barricade down and lost the task for everyone. :joker:

Noooo

It's a fight for possible immunity.

You've got to weaken your opponents.:devil:

Plus the smokers can go a few hours ffs.:laugh:

Unfortunately that makes you weak in the game
You are basically ruled by a packet of fags

I don't deny that but, if my team won, you would ultimately be in my sights. Depends which way you look at it. We all have our weak points. And unless you are a smoker you won't understand where I am coming from. Tobacco is essentially a drug after all.

I just felt a bit more understanding and compassion might have helped in that situation.

I always say put yourself in someone else's shoes and try to see it from their view even if you don't agree.

Imagine having to smoke and put cancerous crap down your throat and if you could not do it you would smash a barricade down. :laugh:
What fools these people are.

My post was meant in a certain context but unfortunately not everyone gets it. Sometimes some don't need to take it quite so literally. Hence the joker emoji.

I take offence at being called a fool.

Takes shoes off and sits down

No because I don't trust BB.

Oh god you're one of them.ask for a break yourself then.

We are told no.

Then that's an organisational problem and not a good one on their part.

It's discrimination although not technically covered by Equality Act.

It's a HR issue.

Whether you smoke or not it would still be considered a break.

I suspect those who don't smoke don't push their rights though.

I certainly would. Nicotine addiction is actually an illness and short of taking bupropion/nortriptyline in bursts or having nicotine patches to ride with, withdrawal and going cold-turkey when you normally smoke 20 a day isn’t the one. If you smoke like that; you likely need it when you need it for as long as you smoke. ’dra’ls ain’t no joke.

…having slept on it and changed my mind…I haven’t changed my mind…:laugh:…I would allow the smoke as it’s an addiction and BB didn’t say…’they may not come through under any circumstances’…it was specifically said that they were allowed through on invitation….i would just ensure that the blood supplies were protected…you can have your smoke but take my blood and you’ll never leave this side alive…:pipe:…

The thing is big brother knows it’s an addiction so why didn’t they say only the smokers are allowed to access the smoking area

It’s vampires against villagers so you would question the facts

The two things that were wrong, the villagers swearing and shouting at the vampires

And the vampires trying to guilt trip the villagers

Don’t hate the player hate the game

:hehe:

You are no fool, everyone has their own vices...


I would have let them in I think, though I understand why they didn't I dont think Hanahs na na na na na....will stand her in good stead, they should have explained why they wouldnt rather than shouting **** off

You are a wise woman

If they're weakened, they're more likely to lose tasks. So nah. They can shorten their lives on their own time.

That's when emma lost her sh it , so the chorus of **** off was worth it :laugh:

great TV but the villagers played it all wrong they have made nomination easy now, fully expect Hannah, Sarah, Marcello and Nathan to be up, think Dean will swerve it sadly

no...................give smokers a head start in quitting.........................

Mark L