ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB10 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=128)
-   -   Should Big Brother Scrap First Week Evictons? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70511)

Benjamin 07-09-2008 03:11 AM

Should Big Brother Scrap First Week Evictons?
 
In BB 1 and 2 there was never an eviction until the 2nd week, this way you got to know all the h/mates properly before casting votes to evict.

I'm surprised BB have not scrapped this yet as they have lost some memorable h/mates in the first week that would have been very interesting to see develop:

BB3: Lynne
BB4: Anouska
BB6: Mary (the scary witch lady)
BB7: Bonnie
BB9: Stephanie

Daniel__ 07-09-2008 03:14 AM

Yeh I think they should all of the above housemates we didnt get to know.

Locke. 07-09-2008 03:14 AM

Yeah we should be given time to get to know all the Housemates before we evict one of them.

_Tom_ 07-09-2008 03:15 AM

Yes!

Novo 07-09-2008 03:15 AM

poor steph :(

ange7 07-09-2008 03:15 AM

yeah ... give them time to settle so we can decide who we want to chuck .... maybe 3 weeks? ...

bigbr0ther 07-09-2008 03:23 AM

No, I like having an eviction each week. Also if they did this they'd have to add an extra week and I think it's too long already!

Friday should always have something happening.

MrGaryy 07-09-2008 03:27 AM

All of them had to go though in order for the twist to work. Steph had to be up cos they couldn't keep that act up for two weeks, Bonnie had to go cos the Big Brotherhood was full, Shabnam actually got two weeks to be fair, Anouska had to go cos the twist was first impression nominations. So yeah, I'd like to see first week evictions go, but I'd like to see first weeks twists stay even more.

markofthebeast 07-09-2008 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ukturtle
In BB 1 and 2 there was never an eviction until the 2nd week, this way you got to know all the h/mates properly before casting votes to evict.

I'm surprised BB have not scrapped this yet as they have lost some memorable h/mates in the first week that would have been very interesting to see develop:

BB3: Lynne
BB4: Anouska
BB6: Mary (the scary witch lady)
BB7: Bonnie
BB8: Shabnam
BB9: Stephanie
shabnam didnt get evicted till about week 2/3

Rory 07-09-2008 06:21 AM

Bonnie wouldn't have lasted.

And Shabnam survived two weeks since Emily was removed the first week.

WeaponX 07-09-2008 08:50 AM

I think they should do a shock midweek eviction on about day 11 because then the public know the HM up for eviction a bit better, although I did feel sorry for Steph this year because half of her time in there was pretending to be Mario's gf and she only had about 3 days as herself.

Spike 07-09-2008 10:17 AM

I think they should, 1 week is not long enough to get to know all the housemates.#
and it could save on bringing new housemates in half way through the series

hannah. 07-09-2008 04:27 PM

Yeah. It's so stupid because the public get rid of a potentially great housemate purely on first impressions, and most HMs change a lot throughout. Nobody's really how they would be later on in their first week

Llamajohn 07-09-2008 07:23 PM

yes

week 2 first eviction please :(

BexButNotCovBex 11-09-2008 07:30 PM

They should be scrapped. You don't get to see what the person nis really like in just a week. I'm forever changing my opinion on housemates, and the first evicted housemate doesn't really get a chance.

Marc 11-09-2008 07:32 PM

Noooooo it makes good tv for the first week, without an eviction it gets well boring

BexButNotCovBex 11-09-2008 07:41 PM

Yeah, but that's a potentially very good housemate gone.

rayheartbliss 11-09-2008 08:16 PM

yerh i think its a good i dea, but eviction in the first week aint that bad, afterall it kinda gives them the role of the person who had the shortest time in the house ^,^

and if they have more than 13 people in the house, then theyd have to do an eviction in the first week otherwise therd just be too many of them

BexButNotCovBex 11-09-2008 09:47 PM

Or they could just have a double eviction or something in the second week? I don't know, but i personally think it should be scrapped.

DigitalSid 11-09-2008 11:37 PM

Yes. Either that or have the whole house up so we can get rid of the truely dull ones and try to feature everyone as much as possible in the highlight shows.

Tom 13-09-2008 05:25 PM

When they do the launch night twists it would be better if they climaxed the following Friday (if they can carry them on that long) so there is a live show each Friday. Then evictions start at the end of week 2 but stick them all up in a vote to save to get rid of any radar dodgers.

I prefer it when they all get a chance to bed in so we can get to know what people are really like not all based on first impressions

*mazedsalv** 13-09-2008 05:39 PM

I agree actually. The public make their minds up after a few days for the girls. The girls get judge way before the boys, thats why a female is always evicted first.

Hopefully, by Week 2 we will know the housemates more than just after 1 week.

*M*a*TT*H*ew* 15-09-2008 06:52 PM

Yes they really should.

You need to know the housemates first for a full week, then we should be able to vote them out, otherwise we will still act irrational when it comes to dialling the phone. Like Anouska was the star of BB4, but people immediately phoned in their thousands to get her out on the first night and first few days, but afterwards, there was a U turn, but it was all too late.

Indierock&roll 15-09-2008 07:03 PM

yeah they should because then we dont really see much of them and dont really have that much of an opinion on them yet and could be evicting a good character!! and alll the housemate that come in like half way through get at least 2 weeks there !

*Bradley* 28-10-2008 02:03 PM

No they should do 1st week eviction as halfway through the 2nd week so day10/11 ish imo.

BBDodge 12-11-2008 11:58 AM

They could start with a fake double eviction in week 1.

Which was how BB5 was supposed to start.

Angel.D 12-11-2008 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BBDodge
They could start with a fake double eviction in week 1.

Which was how BB5 was supposed to start.

I agree that would be funny:laugh3:

GiRTh 12-11-2008 12:56 PM

Probably. They've chucked out some good HM's in the first week.

kevinyeah 03-12-2008 10:12 PM

yeah deffo scrap them, especially if someone as good looking as stephanie is gonna be in wahey

Looweez 01-01-2009 02:52 AM

They should do a fake eviction the first week! :laugh:

Amaru 03-01-2009 06:08 AM

not a fan of fake evictions coughCHARLEYcough lol

anyways, i like an eviction in the first week....if someone is hated in week 1 chances are they wont be loved in week 2, so they would end up going anyways. and the way things are now there are WAY too many HMs each season so that would just be 1 more person in the finale or another double evico added in somewhere.

dont be a b***h in week 1 and you wont go, simple as that...keep the first week evictions!

LeonM 07-01-2009 09:22 PM

I'm not sure but I'm certain Bonnie wouldn't of come far, she was an outcast of the group never did anything and was a completely different person to the woman we saw in her audition.

Billy 07-01-2009 09:23 PM

Bonnie didnt get her suitcase till the day before she was evicted, and that night she was totally different but it wasn't enough.

I love Bonnie :(

30stone 07-01-2009 09:24 PM

Yes, its kinda of annoying people like ben lucy and michelle only starting to become characters now maybe because they arent as outspoken as the rest people are already starting to call them boring though...

Wildcat! 07-01-2009 09:28 PM

I dont like the first week eviction. Not enough time to form a real opinion. Especially last year, where it was obvious Stephanie would go, because she wasnt keen on pretending to like Mario, which wasnt really fair to her. If there wasnt a first week eviction, I think she was down to earth enough to last a very long time that series.

Tom 07-01-2009 09:29 PM

In the celebrity one ... no. A first week eviction in CBB is the equivalent of a week 4 eviction in normal BB.

In normal BB ... yes. They need time to bed in and in BB9 Stephanie was gaining momentum just as she was evicted but it was too late to save her.

If there is a pblic vote in the first week I'd rather it was for a fake eviction of some kind

EDIT: LOL I wrote practically the same thing on the first page :joker:

Amaru 08-01-2009 07:30 AM

Steph did get screwed, i will give you that. But on a normal season where there are noms the firts week i think there should be an eviction week 1. Like i said above, dont be a bitch off the bat and you wont get nominated or evicted right away. Simple as. But ya Steph did get screwed....she never had a chance just because she was chosen for that role in the first week twist on BB9

jadelovesbritney 08-01-2009 02:24 PM

yeah thats would be sm better!
because, imo, steph should NOT have gone out in the first week on BB9 man!

and yeah you dont get to know the HMs well enough.

WATERS 08-01-2009 02:39 PM

Yeah, we should be given time to get to know the housemates first.

Jackie 08-01-2009 02:50 PM

No I like the idea of the first week.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.