I Hate
 

how everytime there's a fight with Britney Spears fans, because of PROVOCATION, it is ALWAYS ALWAYS the Britney fans that get banned because the admins here fail to always see the other side of the argument, and that it is infact the stupid, pain in the arse, **** stirring members that always cause the trouble and NOT the Britney fans.

I find, from recent events, that the admins here are SELECTIVE, and fail to see the cause of a simple argument. Because Britney fans are a wider minority, what, are we easier to target?

**** TiBB, it is going down the drain, very very fast.

:bored:

No, if people dont make the comments then they dont get a warning. I dont think Nicky hardly provoked Hugo, yet what he said was unnacebtable. Also, Markus' ban wasn't to do with Britney.

If they annoy you that much Damon - 'Ignore'
:eureka:

Edit - this thread is abit Ironic - the titles is a rule breach.

Hahahahaha... Ahhhh.. C'mon forget about it, britney is only some music thingy... Don't take it too heart! Not real!!!! Stick your head out the door and you will see what is real. :flowers:

Hugo's comment was a simple joke, Nicky overreacts like she did with the TiBB Magazine escelade. Hugo's comment weas humorous, it wasn't to be taken seriously, but because it was the aftermath of a Britney related argument, admins took it to heart and then he was banned.

aha the thread title is weird. Cause I has to be capital cause its the start of a sentence and I'm stressing the word hate ye see :lovedup:

Agreed tibb is getting **** some members need to be banned

Britney Spears isn't a member on TiBB, insulting her does not go against the rules.

Ohh haha I see now, thats happend to me before.

And to be fair, I think its hard to tell when people are serious or joking, as I have been in similar situations before. But I personally thought HUGO was being serious, and I guess thats why we shouldn't say such things.

Hense we should all try and get along more again, like we used to :dance:

RIGHTS FOR BRITNEY FANS NOW!!

Its Britneyist otherwise :bored:

Yet provoking her fans in her official thread does.

Wait until Posted finally gets round to obsessing over her, then we'll think shes a member

What constitutes provocation??

Surely any insult toward Britney would "provoke" her fans.

Cant we all just forget about last night?

Pointlessly posting bald pictures of her in the thread with no explanation? Often saying comments which they KNOW will develop into an argument.

Simply click 'Ignore', or ignore it in your head.
It will stop.

They develop into an argument because Britney fans argue when she's insulted, or if someone mocks her. I understand it might anger you, but to then insult a member cos of it is taking it too far.

Being "provoked" is something you can control.

I know there is members coming in the BS thread trying to irritate some members and they manage to do it. So if a Britney fan bites back they are the ones to get banned or whatever. The people who try to get them to bite back are happy because they get them banned and they are of Scott free trying to get the next fan banned.

Its so annoying :mad:

What exactly happened last night?

Exactally.

Why would an admin ban a member for insulting BRITNEY? She's not a member here. We're free to dislike which celebs we want. If Britney was a member, then they'd be banned for insulting her.

The Britney fans know the rules - don't personally insult forum members. So why do they disregard this and bite back, and then try and argue the case?

We shouldn't HAVE to ignore them. We should be able to comfortably post in her thread without having to dodge the silly twits who pointlessly post horrible things in her thread.

Looking back through tibb history... The tibb site did seem better before these young britney fans came along.

What happened last night?

Big stuff always happens when I'm not around and I spend the rest of my time on here when nout happens :bored:

Well your not going to post 'comfortably' if you react with insults.

Britney Fans and Non-Brit fans annoying each other.... wasnt serious, just a bit of banter.

So what do you expect us to? Just sit back and let them pollute the FAN THREAD while insulting her? WTF?

Yes? :puzzled: Just don't react to it.

I'm on the admins side with that, HUGO may have been joking but a joke is only a joke when both parties involved find it funny. Insulting someone in the way he did could easily upset someone, especially if it's something that they find offensive.

I see where you're coming from yes, and people shouldn't go out of their way to insult her, the spamming in the Britney thread was ridiculous and immature, but you guys need to learn to be less defensive. If I'm honest, it has got a LOT better, before you couldn't say a single negative thing without your head being bitten off but it obviously still needs work.
I'd never insult Britney without reason, yes I make negative comments in the Britney thread [usually about her miming which I personally detest anyway, and I've said the same thing in the Xtina thread] so I hope I'm not someone that's being described in this thread as provoking y'all.

Also, I don't think these 'official artist' threads should be JUST for fan. I've always seen it as a place for the fans to hang out and talk yeah, but they're main purpose IMO is to post news about that artist and discuss them, be it negative or positive [as long as it's mature, obvs]

Sorry if some of that didn't make sense, I'm getting lost into MGMT.

Its not really 'polluting'. If you report every perogative post from now on something will be done.

Because they go out of there way to insult her with anyway they can, They are trying to get a reaction. I know people don't like some celebrity's but they don't need to go in the Britney thread talking trash about her because that is a place for Fans of her. They bite back because they are true fans of hers.

Yes Bang On Right
Andyman



Do Not Take It To Heart



This Is a Forum that works well
well Done
Mark , James and Admin.


Life In The City.

I agree it's childish of people to go into the Britney thread just to post silly pics of her or whatever, but when a Britney fan bites back because they're "true fans" then they should accept the consequences.

There's not a clause in the rules of the site that say "insulting is allowed if person is a Britney fan provoked". They know the consequences of the rule-break - fair enough if they still wanna do it, but then don't complain about what happens afterwards.

Exactally. You wouldn't moan if they said it in a Britney news story thread.

If it carries on I think all fan threads should be closed, and have individual threads for each news storie. Unless of course people dont respond to it all.

But when we react why is it only us banned and not the person who MADE us react?

You couldn't close fan threads :shocked:

Personally I'm probably on the Britney fan's side as if anyone came into my Take That thread and started slagging them off I would be severely p***ed off as well. You can't expect fans not to react. On DS there's an apperciation section in the BB forum which I think works well. I think the fan thread's should be like that here.

Because there isn't a rule that says "Don't provoke Britney fans"

Even if they're acting like twats, they're not breaking rules by it.

if Britney fans weren't so protective of her they wouldn't be so many argument's about her how can you defend her when you don't know her

But surely it's against the rules to knowingly cause an argument? And that's where the admins fail here, they don't ban the people who are knowingly causing trouble.

Well I'm sure if I said in a Taylor Swift thread, "Taylor Swift is a talentless, stupid ****ing rat faced looking *****" you'd try to defend her. :rolleyes:

That's true.