ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB6 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=44)
-   -   editing for max/saskia (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10147)

cc100 21-06-2005 07:49 PM

editing for max/saskia
 
is this bb? or is it the max and saskia show??

these two are the biggest actors ever to be on bb.

id love them to be split up but theyll probably be in the last 3- those sorts usually are

Kore 21-06-2005 07:52 PM

nah, dont think so..

big brother edited for nadia, but not for these too im afraid to tell you..

i know how much you try and make everyone else deteste max.

you can get saskia out tho, shes playing him on for the votes

InTheHood 21-06-2005 07:52 PM

Well, BB didn't punish them for nomination talks.

They'll be there come the last week should they avoid straight knockout between the two

cc100 21-06-2005 07:54 PM

yeah, saskia is a right 'un.

terrible woman

Ruth 21-06-2005 08:53 PM

If saskia goes, Max might make it to the final week, but I can't see both of them being there. They are boring to watch though - I'm not a big fan of Max, but if Saskia went, I think he would be more fun to watch.

Red Moon 21-06-2005 09:26 PM

Your right cc100

There has been a lot of editing in favor of Maxwell and Saski.... and being allowed to nominate are discussing nominations.... well what can you say.

I'm not sure what the program makers aim's are but if it to make us switch off by being bias they are doing a great job. !

Kore 21-06-2005 10:14 PM

nah, big brother did that for nadia.

i cant see them doing it for max.

Romantic Old Bird 22-06-2005 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Red Moon
Your right cc100

There has been a lot of editing in favor of Maxwell and Saski.... and being allowed to nominate are discussing nominations.... well what can you say.

I'm not sure what the program makers aim's are but if it to make us switch off by being bias they are doing a great job. !
Hi Red Moon

I gather from reading another thread that you are probably a teacher or FE lecturer.

PLEASE tell me that you don't teach English.

Can I just point out the following:

'Your'

In the context you used the word it is 'you're' or better still 'you are'. Your applies to things belonging or pertaining to you.

'Aim's'

No apostrophe here


'Bias'

A perfectly correct word, but you mean 'biased'. Alternatively you could have used the word 'bias' if you had said by showing bias.


Program

We still live in Great Britain, so unless referring to something like a computer program, the correct spelling for something that is broadcast on television or radio is 'programme'.

I point these things out to you in the friendliest terms Red Moon.

I am acting solely as a public service to someone who is shaping the minds of our youth!:thumbs:

Princess Pink Pants 22-06-2005 09:07 AM

I dont have E4 so all Ive seen is the channel 4 programmes and I don't feel like it's been biased towards Saskia and Maxwell.

I think that the end of a few of the programmes have been showing a lot of Maxwell, Saskia and Anthony but I got the impression that's because they were the only people still up.

I think future opinion of Maxwell will be based on how he copes when he finds out the real task. At the moment he's doing really well, but I wonder how he'll react when he finds out that they've all been having party's while he's been doing these mind-numbing tasks!

Ruth 22-06-2005 09:17 AM

It's not so much that the highlights programme on channel 4 is biased towards Max and Saskia. The thing is that Max and Saskia broke the rules in exactly the same way as Derek, Roberto and Craig (although it's debatable as to whether Craig even broke any rules), but the channel 4 prgramme didn't show that, and they weren't punished like the others were.

Apparently endemol and channel 4 have had 100s of complaints about it, although I can't verify how much truth there is in that.

BusyBee 22-06-2005 09:18 AM

Love your sense of humour ROB lol.


Though to get back to the thread. BB has already decided it wants Maxwell to win hence the endless hours we get of the terrible trio (or should I say frightful foursome now that Craig has joined forces) sitting on those orange sofas rabbiting about nothing.

Quite right they have got away with murder - one rule for some and one rule for the other. Come on BB be fair to everyone.

How long before the others cotton on to the game that group are playing and gang up against them. Please!!!

Seer 22-06-2005 07:05 PM

The only reason that Max and Saskia may have looked good in editing is because they are good and most entertaining as well. having watched E4 interactive for most of last night and today the editing team will struggle to find anything positive about Makosi and Vanessa has they have spent all the time dissing everyone.

Ruth 22-06-2005 08:07 PM

It's not so much editing to make them look good, but the things they don't show!

Kore 22-06-2005 08:08 PM

yeah .. they didnt show maxwell making up with science and roberto, on love night...

and showed maxwell's worst bits:rolleyes:

cc100 22-06-2005 08:13 PM

He reminds me of the lads who think its fun to invade places like Faliraki or Ibiza and show up the UK by drinking way too much and being an anmial- having sex in alleyways etc

I hope the public see through this and dont vote him the winner. Id even prefer Saskia to win and I cant stand her!

Red Moon 22-06-2005 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Romantic Old Bird
Quote:

Originally posted by Red Moon
Your right cc100

There has been a lot of editing in favor of Maxwell and Saski.... and being allowed to nominate are discussing nominations.... well what can you say.

I'm not sure what the program makers aim's are but if it to make us switch off by being bias they are doing a great job. !
Hi Red Moon

I gather from reading another thread that you are probably a teacher or FE lecturer.

PLEASE tell me that you don't teach English.

Can I just point out the following:

'Your'

In the context you used the word it is 'you're' or better still 'you are'. Your applies to things belonging or pertaining to you.

'Aim's'

No apostrophe here


'Bias'

A perfectly correct word, but you mean 'biased'. Alternatively you could have used the word 'bias' if you had said by showing bias.


Program

We still live in Great Britain, so unless referring to something like a computer program, the correct spelling for something that is broadcast on television or radio is 'programme'.

I point these things out to you in the friendliest terms Red Moon.

I am acting solely as a public service to someone who is shaping the minds of our youth!:thumbs:
Don't worry I don't teach English.... wouldn't be much point given I'm Dyslexic !

Kore 22-06-2005 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Red Moon
Quote:

Originally posted by Romantic Old Bird
Quote:

Originally posted by Red Moon
Your right cc100

There has been a lot of editing in favor of Maxwell and Saski.... and being allowed to nominate are discussing nominations.... well what can you say.

I'm not sure what the program makers aim's are but if it to make us switch off by being bias they are doing a great job. !
Hi Red Moon

I gather from reading another thread that you are probably a teacher or FE lecturer.

PLEASE tell me that you don't teach English.

Can I just point out the following:

'Your'

In the context you used the word it is 'you're' or better still 'you are'. Your applies to things belonging or pertaining to you.

'Aim's'

No apostrophe here


'Bias'

A perfectly correct word, but you mean 'biased'. Alternatively you could have used the word 'bias' if you had said by showing bias.


Program

We still live in Great Britain, so unless referring to something like a computer program, the correct spelling for something that is broadcast on television or radio is 'programme'.

I point these things out to you in the friendliest terms Red Moon.

I am acting solely as a public service to someone who is shaping the minds of our youth!:thumbs:
Don't worry I don't teach English.... wouldn't be much point given I'm Dyslexic !
i dont see the point in correcting spelling and grammar, its completely off-topic.

unless the person had spoke in txt speak.:bored:

steve-g 22-06-2005 08:38 PM

nah, dont think so..

big brother edited for nadia, but not for these too I'm afraid to tell you..

i know how much you try and make everyone else deteste max.

you can get saskia out tho, shes playing him on for the votes



i totally agree with that

Ruth 22-06-2005 09:48 PM

I don't try to make people detest Max. I'm not a fan of Max, but there are people I definitely want out of the house before him. I think he would be better in the house if Saskia was out.

Red Moon 22-06-2005 09:50 PM

Thanks Kore

I thought that the editing was much better so far tonight. I wonder if they are starting to pick up some complaints from viewers.

jt 22-06-2005 10:34 PM

Quote:

i dont see the point in correcting spelling and grammar, its completely off-topic.

unless the person had spoke in txt speak.:bored:
Yes, you probably wouldn't. Maybe it is (the shortened version of which is it's, not its) off topic, but it's perfectly valid to correct bad usage of language. If more people paid attention to their spelling and grammar then they wouldn't need to be corrected, would they?

Kore 22-06-2005 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jt
Quote:

i dont see the point in correcting spelling and grammar, its completely off-topic.

unless the person had spoke in txt speak.:bored:
Yes, you probably wouldn't. Maybe it is (the shortened version of which is it's, not its) off topic, but it's perfectly valid to correct bad usage of language. If more people paid attention to their spelling and grammar then they wouldn't need to be corrected, would they?
why be corrected if its perfectly understandable???????
please tell me.

anyway, i had an A in english so my exam mark is the proof, not my writing on a forum.

jt 22-06-2005 10:44 PM

:hello::laugh:

Kore 22-06-2005 10:45 PM

lol:laugh::laugh::devil::bouncy:

Red Moon 22-06-2005 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jt
Quote:

i dont see the point in correcting spelling and grammar, its completely off-topic.

unless the person had spoke in txt speak.:bored:
Yes, you probably wouldn't. Maybe it is (the shortened version of which is it's, not its) off topic, but it's perfectly valid to correct bad usage of language. If more people paid attention to their spelling and grammar then they wouldn't need to be corrected, would they?
Not everyone has the benefit of a mind that works correctly. Ten percent of the population are dyslexic and that is a fact of life. It affects the whole of their schooling and because the poor support given to students at school many, later in life have a problem with grammar and spelling which they are unable to find solutions to for themselves.

I have done research in some of the countries top research institutes and have a number of academic papers to my name which have been published in some of the top journals in my field. I have traveled in Europe presenting papers at international conferences. My dyslexia has always been there.... a pain in my side, but I have always got my message across.

Does correcting a persons grammar or spelling help a dyslexic.... the answer is no.... it just makes them want to tell you to ****** off and get a life.

The prisons are full of some of the best minds of the country, people who were told they stupid at school because they were dyslexic and then turned to crime. I know, have educated some of them and they are brilliant.

If you can't understand what I'm trying to say don't bother replying.

Sorry MODS


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.