Complain about Sophie not getting punished!!
 

Did you complain when Hira got the boot for Siavash's and Marcus's rule break?

There was no need! The rule breakers were punished, which isn't the case this time!

Yeah right punished to the point they got cocky with what happened.

The punishment by BB was lettiing housemates discuss nominations. I guess the manipulating bitch saw Marcus and Halfwit off!

I agree Sophie should be punished big time! :mad:

it wasn't just Sophie rule breaking tho; yes she WAS doing it, but so were a few others

Sophie is getting away with it

The punishment for all the nomination talk (including Dogfaces) was the freedom to discuss the nominations, so Dogface has been punished alongside all other guilty parties (and innocent ones too).
The fact that it will probably be Marcus and Freddie up for eviction is due to the housemates vote and is quite fair, in fact it is karma, all the rule breaking they have done recently.

BEA spoke about noms too! so she should be punished too then? :bored:

ITS NOT JUST SOPHIE!!!

You're right. Bea should also be punished.

How can the fact that they were allowed to discuss nominations, before, present and future be a punishment for Dogface? She mentioned nominations five times and gets away with it.

Rubbish........Dogface has been punished for rule breaking........along with the rest of the house........

Listen to what the punishment was for goodness sake.......The punishment was for constant rule breaking........No specific rule just general constant rule breaking.......Therfore all rule breakers including dogface have recieved their punishment......

It's not bloody rocket science is it!!!!!!!!!

Marcus and Freddie only have themselves to blame ...

Every other punishment for speaking about nominations though(except siavashs first one, but they are always more lenient in the first few weeks), has resulted in the guilty party being up, wether as part of the whole house or seperate. This week is a blatant fix.

It is not 'punishment' to be able to speak freely of nominations, especially when this only allows you to get 2 other people up.

DONE.

My complaint:

I am very disappointed at the way this week's nominations have been handled. I think that all of the rulebreakers should be punished, either by putting them all up for eviction or better yet, putting up the ones who broke the rules. More of them should be up for eviction, such as Dogface and Bea. Both of them tried to influence nominations, I feel that they should be up with Marcus and anyone else who influenced nominations this week (before they were allowed to speak about it).

There was no real punishment this week, giving them free reign to discuss nominations is not punishment.

I will not be voting this week for anyone, and I doubt I will now vote the rest of the series. I feel that BB is being manipulative and by changing the rules to fit each week's storyline isn't fair on the housemates or the public.

:spin:

done and sent one to everyone on my contacts who like bb

That's not a punishment though, it's a reward. They let her keep doing exactly what she was doing. It's like someone being caught robbing a bank, and as a punishment they're told they can keep robbing more banks.

No

Bea and Dogface should have been up with both these guy's.

Done. Thanks for that.

No they should not........The house recieved a collective rule breaking punishment covering all rules broken including nominations talk.....

What some people want is for Dogface to be singled out for extra punishment.......Utterly ridiculous....

The two guys up got themselves in that pickle.......Blaming BB or Dogface is a diversion from reality......

Very good and very true comparrison.

I complained, damn ridiculous.

:joker:

I think Sophie should be punished as she as said numerous times she wants to be put up, so let it be, I think on her own she is quite spineless, can you remember the first few weeks said nothing she knows that Lisa is watching her back. I don't dislike her she just bores me.

Done

Your Channel 4 enquiry [Ref 818913]