RIGHT! regarding dogface punishment!
 

:wavey:

I have read many threads over the last few days about "why isn't dogface getting punished for discussing nominations" well why aren't you moaning about Bea getting punished too then????????:rolleyes:

We saw it on the same highlights as dogface, Bea was sat at the bus stop trying to influence Lisa and freddie to nominate David!:nono: this is clearly breaking the rules too,

So your threads should read "why aren't dogface and BEA getting punished"
:bored:

:wavey:

I think a lot of threads have mentioned that Bea needs to be punished, but also people are annoyed that BB seems to be manipulating things in Dogface's favour.

Her & Bea's punishment was probably part of the food been took away because they said consequences for all rule breaks, then food was taken!

Agree:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:

Exactly this ^^^ They've already been punished enough, Sophie faced eviction last week when she didn't do anything wrong because Marcus and Siavash were being childish, shes had enough punishment

sophie done it 5 times in one night stating she wants to be up against marcus and freddie..she has broken the nomination rule 3 times??

Marcus,Siavash and halftit have broken maney rules many times i'm only aware of Sophie breaking the rules twice.

Siavash should have been ejected for FUNDAMENTAL breach of rules by refusing to nominate (talking of noms is minor infraction)

In the history of BBUK he is firtst not ejected for FUNDAMENTAL rule break - in normal yeears, he was out door and Marcus vs Bea

If you read what ive been saying i said the both of them have got off scot free.
Its been fixed so at least one of the girls survives so they can have a female in the final.
Thats what they have done it for

I said ive read many threads, some threads do mention both (yours):thumbs: but a lot just say dogface!:bored:

It wasn't Lisa and Freddie Bea was trying to influence to nominate David at teh bus stop, it was Siavash and Freddie. The fact that she didn't mention the word 'nominate' means that she didn't discuss nominations, even though she was trying to manipulate the nominations. Remember how many times Lisa did exactly the same to Karly and Kris when she tried to influence them to nominate Freddie and BB did nothing then. But Dogface deserved to be punished properly and she was defiant when she deliberately said, on five occasions, that she wanted to be put up for eviction. Just BB making sure their favourites weren't up.

^^^^

she was clearly trying to influence them:bored: she doesn't need to mention the word, she still broke the rules as it states trying to indicate who you may/may not nominate!:bored: savash not lisa oh right ok :whistle:

What we do not know or cannot see is how often housemates talk about nominations. For all we know ALL of them may have broken BB rules?
I agree HMs should be punished but maybe it was becoming silly; plus we are yet to see if BB manipulate the HMs with another sudden change of rule?

Why is it so difficult for people to understand the HL show said quite clearly

that because some of the housemates (not just Sophie) had spoken about

nominations there would be a consequence, the consequence being they were

allowed to discuss nominations. What might be considered more unfair is

that Bea and Marcus were nominated last week but due to once again HM

discussing nominations the whole lot then went up for evicition and Hira who

had not been nominated was evicted. It was a much fairer consequence this

week as nominations went ahead as they should with HM selecting and not

the public.