Sophies punishment...(Spoiler)
 

Sophie was told that the first two housemates she mentions by name would be her nominations....

------------

"Sophie adds that all Housemates should have done the same as her and Siavash, and that this would be the fairest way. David is upset however saying that everyone knew the rules when they entered and that everyone should nominate. He calls the whole situation pathetic.

In the Bedroom Sophie asks Rodrigo if she thinks the other Housemates are upset now, and she now fears she could be up for nomination with Bea.

The first two Housemates mentioned and therefore nominated by Sophie are Rodrigo and Bea. "

---------------

Now, everyone knows my dislike of Bea...but the first two people sophie named were SIAVASH and Rodrigo...they seem to of ignored the fact that she said Siavashs name, to get Bea up for eviction...

I also love this

---

In the Bedroom, Housemates are discussing Siavash's 'nominations' and Charlie gets annoyed with Siavash thinking that Big Brother has chosen his nominations at random. Siavash is trying to explain his theory but Charlie just calls him 'an idiot'.

------

Love how charlie whinges at siavash, but says nothing to sophie, who did exactly the same thing...

She would've still gone up anyway. So it matters not.

I was thinking this when I saw this before, she said Siavash's name first.

So he would have been up as well because he would have had 3 nominations, the same as Marcus and David right?

Bea would still have had 4 noms, Lisa, Marcus, Rodrigo and by Siavash coming into contact with her after coming out the diary room.

So they not actually trying to get Bea up, she would have been up anyway?

More like protecting Siavash!

It is unfair however Bea would still of got 4 and still been up

Yeah, I never worked out how many votes people got...but that seems right.

They appear to have been protecting him for a while now...really they should have kicked him out at his first refusal to nominate...

They are protecting Rodrigo

I don't think they should've kicked him out for not nominating. His rule breaking has certainly played its part in making the show more interesting. Anyway, rules are meant to be broken (within reason), just so the unknown can be breached (:

Lets not forget others have refused to nominate before.

How on earth do you figure that?!

Rodrigo wouldn't have been up anyway! Noone else nominated him! :laugh:

You can tell that Charlie doesnt like Siavash he always has sly comments to make about Siavash,even last night when he was gettin his video from his mum and cousin Charlie had his sly comment to make when Siavash sat in the chair for a few seconds after the video 'he is trying to milk it' or something like that.

They are protecting Marcus. He has broken the rules on numerous occasions, but how are they protecting Rodders?

Wait I got confused.

:pat:

LOL

or even nothing like that.

Just to be clear as I think I missed something somewhere, Do all the housemates know that Sophie broke the rules aswell as Siavash?

Perhaps she didn't actually say his name first? I don't think that they're cheating on that because they could easily have decided on how they were going to determine the two names after they saw her behaviour. After all why didn't they have the names chosen in the same way for both Siavash and Sophie? They could also easily edit out any instance of her saying any names they didn't want us to hear to get who they wanted up and we'd never know.

:shrug:

Must admit to having been a fan of Siavash all the way through but your right in this one. If you don't nominate what the hell is the point in being in there, probably clinging to the limelight I suppose. The rules of the show are you nominate each week, so what the hell is this all about.