Siavash robbing public
 

Siavash is robbing the public of the eviction process. He is hoping that all the hm's will be up for eviction each week, which makes him feel more safe. But if we got the opportunity to evict any hm all the time then it would be so boring because when we dislike a hm like Bea we would know that she would be gone the next eviction so we would be deprived of the pleasure of hating her. Loving to hate hm's is all the fun. Also someone like Marcus would have gone home in the early stages, before we got the chance to see how awesome he is. Siavash is so dumb because because the real players in BB are the public and he is s****ing on them. BB need to show him the door now.
Bea out on Friday - The headless horseman is riding his dark horse all the way to the finish line - It can only be Marcus to win.

Siavash is basically a twit

....and Sophie? this is a prime example of jumping on something cos you dont like the man! Its a bloody farce...people only voting for the easy target each week, its hardly been genuine all series....BB noms gone stale

Your missing the point, BB was played by Siavash's rules it would be REALLY boring. Bea would have been out weeks ago as a newcomer and deprived us of hours of jaw dropping entertainment. As for Sophie she's an idiot but she has just done it once, Siavash is doing it again and again. Is it the public who decide or Siavash!

Both Siavash and Sophieare appalling h/mates and neither provide any entertainment by previous years standards!
As for Bea, ok I take te point about her being good to hate, but she is really a very poor example of a human being, proof that the producers have run out of ideas
Siavash should have been kicked out the first time he said he wouldn't nominate, then gutless sophie would have found 2 names !!!

get siavash out!!

Siavash is cool, give him a break you haters.

It's not that people hate Siavash, I like Siavash, he is taking the rules into his own hands by refusing to nominate. This is not in the spirit of the game or the contract he signed to be there.

His motives are suspect when he is trying to defend Bea. She victimised his 'friend' Freddie and now he thinks that nominations shouldn't be based on a HM's actions in previous weeks? HM can nominate whomever they please for whatever reason BB thinks is reasonable.

He needs to play by the rules or walk. If he won't walk, he should be pushed.

Have given him a break and another, and another........ how many does he want. Still missing the point I dont care if Siavash wins only that he is taking the fun out of it by his rules the big characters would have gone out early and we would be left with the boring ones. It takes time for characters and personalities to come through and we LOVE to HATE people, its part of the experience. Otherwise boring TV

People aren't necessarily missing your point. Some people just don't agree with you.

The whole house isn't up. That's only happened once, and personally I think that was good.

why is everyone just blaminsg siavash,sopie didnt nominate too.i would prefer they did nominate but im sick of reading how crap a housemate siavash is for not nominating and very few about sophie,i like both these housemates but both were wrong and at least siavash gave a reason for not nominating

And it could happen again next week. He knew what he was signing up to and is just wimping out.

BB has not told the HMs how the votes were arrived at. Much as I dislike Bea she has every right to feel victimised this week. As far as she's concerned BB have given her 2 extra random votes. If she decides to walk before Friday we will be deprived of an eviction because of Siavash and Sophie.

Thank you that is the point. It got nothing to do with a HM it got to do with whether it takes the fun out of it for us. Respect your opinion and others is different to mine thats what BB about. Perhaps thread should have been as a question 'Is Siavash robbing public?' apologies for that mistake

No he isn't robbing us. He didn't nominate so BB came up with a rather novel way of nominating for him. This way was no more unfair than him just picking out two names randomly himself. When it gets to this stage and everyone seems to get on (thats what they're saying, not me) then I don't mind so much. If he had refused to nominate from the start it would've been different.

Disclaimer: I don't want Siavash to win but I can see where he is coming from. Marcus to win (:

I'd say No, he just robbed himself of a chance to influence the votes, we still get to vote.

ps, I don't think you're a hater really :p

how is saivash robbing the public people acting like they dont know wats going on why they dont blame lisa and her crew for nomination because they who mess up the hole nomination process by block voting for they crew nominations is not fair any way so he have a right not to nominate

Nominating is a fundamental part of the game. Siavash knew it when he signed up. Suppose they all randomly said at different times "I'm not going to vote this week" it wouldn't be the show we want and expect to see.

...and Sophie has talked about Noms to get herself up a couple of times too....people only jump on what Siavash does because they dont like him FACT

I loved the way BB did it after Siavash and Sophie didn't nominate. I was willing Bea to bump into Siavash as they walked out for a smoke.

I also like Siavash more for the way he is doing his own thing when it comes to nominations.

I agree with his reasons for not nominating this week.

I actually think the final few weeks everyone should be up, that way the public REALLY DO decide who gets into the final and wins.

BB have made the whole thing a joke anyway by making it ok for them to discuss nominations and I think this is what Siavash is getting at. People can be picked off too easily by the block vote so it's not fair.

Because he's probably going to win the show, the dumb ****.

He needs to be thrown out.

[quote]Originally posted by shirl1
why is everyone just blaminsg siavash,sopie didnt nominate too.i would prefer they did nominate but im sick of reading how cr*p a housemate siavash is for not nominating and very few about sophie,i like both these housemates but both were wrong and at least siavash gave a reason for not nominating


thankyou one person that think the esact same as me
the thing that most annoys me is that everyone is ignoring the fact that sophie done it to

This is not Siavash's fault. It is BB's fault.

When the housemates continually discussed nominations they should have been punished. The punishment last week was pathetic and only served to get 2 popular housemates up. They should have put everyone up with a vote to save until the final, that way we could keep the interesting housemates and get rid of the bores. The only people who wouldn't agree with this are the Lisa/Charlie/David/Bea supporters because they know that if it was everyone up and a vote to save that their favorite would be gone already.

Siavash was right when he said that they used last week to get Freddie and Marcus in the corner. The housemates and the viewers supported Bea last week (which sickened me), then turn around and say she is negative when she was exactly the same (if not worse) last week.

If BB had been strong they could have either put everyone up or told them that breaking nominations rules would result in immediate eviction, because they pussy footed around though it has come to this.

So don't blame Siavash, blame BB or blame yourselves.

Well I think BB did not want either Freddie or Marcus to win so that is why those two were up alone to get rid of one of them.

Siewash knew that this week it would be Marcus and Seiwash because he has been listen all week to the nom talk.

His action was to hope the whole lot would be up and he sees that as fair.
Bea was certain to be up even if Sophie and Siewash had voted.
Of course Bea is whining about it, what else does she do. If she gave up a good job that is her problem. Did she think she was going to make money going into BB?

[quote]Originally posted by CaPPa
This is not Siavash's fault. It is BB's fault.

When the housemates continually discussed nominations they should have been punished. The punishment last week was pathetic and only served to get 2 popular housemates up. They should have put everyone up with a vote to save until the final, that way we could keep the interesting housemates and get rid of the bores. The only people who wouldn't agree with this are the Lisa/Charlie/David/Bea supporters because they know that if it was everyone up and a vote to save that their favorite would be gone already.

Siavash was right when he said that they used last week to get Freddie and Marcus in the corner. The housemates and the viewers supported Bea last week (which sickened me), then turn around and say she is negative when she was exactly the same (if not worse) last week.

If BB had been strong they could have either put everyone up or told them that breaking nominations rules would result in immediate eviction, because they pussy footed around though it has come to this.

So don't blame Siavash, blame BB or blame yourselves.

well said:thumbs: