ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Alcohol and cigarettes are more harmful than Ecstasy and LSD, says drugs tsar (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=121274)

Crimson Dynamo 29-10-2009 09:38 AM

Alcohol and cigarettes are more harmful than Ecstasy and LSD, says drugs tsar
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...rugs-tsar.html


I guess that any paramedic would probably agree?

Stu 29-10-2009 09:48 AM

No room for debate, really. And I am not a fan of Ecstasy at all. But most dangers come from the fact that most of the time, E is not E. Those herbal BZP pills they had on the market were worse than real E.

As for LSD, how can we justify military budgets when thousands of people are lying in fields going ''my god ......... I love everything.''

Crimson Dynamo 29-10-2009 09:57 AM

alcohol is a very dangerous legal drug but i doubt many teenagers see it as such

Nurse57 29-10-2009 10:00 AM

"As for LSD, how can we justify military budgets when thousands of people are lying in fields going ''my god ......... I love everything.''

I was the military that developed LSD. **** you enemy up and they are easier to kill.

Stu 29-10-2009 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nurse57 (Post 2636966)
"As for LSD, how can we justify military budgets when thousands of people are lying in fields going ''my god ......... I love everything.''

I was the military that developed LSD. **** you enemy up and they are easier to kill.

They did tests on it yeah but it was synthesized by complete accident by Albert Hoffman.

Nurse57 29-10-2009 10:07 AM

And then developed by the military.

arsenalforever 29-10-2009 10:07 AM

give me some lsd Right now

Nurse57 29-10-2009 10:08 AM

I am just being a pedant. Take no notice of me.

bananarama 30-10-2009 05:53 PM

He is right but the problem with his irresposibe statement is it makes drugs look like a good alternative by those dumb enough to want them....

Latest new is he has been sacked and rightly so......

30stone 30-10-2009 05:57 PM

For me it depends how much you have.

Have 4 pints im sure im doing less harm than if i take e or lsd...

Crimson Dynamo 30-10-2009 06:04 PM

the old e's were wonky. half and you were away for hours (early 90's) now they last 20 mins

WOMBAI 31-10-2009 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 2636912)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...rugs-tsar.html


I guess that any paramedic would probably agree?

Smoking - in the long-term - is equally as harmful.

Alcohol can be equally harmful if abused.

But it is just a case of wishful thinking to say that they are more harmful - than LSD or ecstasy thus implying that they are not particularly harmful.

Of course they are - on both mental and physical health.

Prole 01-11-2009 01:11 AM

Professor David Nutt wasn't expressing a half-baked opinion, he was reporting the findings of scientific tests carried out by him and other professionals. The government has now sacked him because his clinical findings clashed with their opinions. So... even when the scientific evidence is there, the government can ignore it and imagine they still knows best.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.