ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Are monotheistic religions held to higher regard than polytheistic ones? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=127375)

InOne 12-01-2010 04:46 PM

Are monotheistic religions held to higher regard than polytheistic ones?
 
People seem to assume that the idea of one God seems to make more sense than many gods. Why is it always debated that is must have been one god that created the universe? Seems to me the Abrahamic Triangle of Insanity (to quote Pat Condell) gets more respect and is held to higher regard than the others, just because they have a lot of followers. Which leads to me to another quote 'If a million people believe a foolish thing, then it is still a foolish thing' Even though say the Greek, Roman and Egyptian gods have all been put as 'myth' there is no reason why anyone should take them more or less serious than the monotheistic religions.

-Was bored and felt like a rant- O.o

Crimson Dynamo 12-01-2010 04:50 PM

I like a good leather one myself. man-made religions tend to chaff

LemonJam 12-01-2010 04:51 PM

I think they get more respect because people think that 1 God is just 1 'imaginary friend' so to speak. Polytheistic Gods may seem to some like multiple 'imaginary friends' to make it more 'fun' if you get what I mean.

I dunno how to word it, that was the best I could do LOL

InOne 12-01-2010 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LemonJam (Post 2863308)
I think they get more respect because people think that 1 God is just 1 'imaginary friend' so to speak. Polytheistic Gods may seem to some like multiple 'imaginary friends' to make it more 'fun' if you get what I mean.

I dunno how to word it, that was the best I could do LOL

I guess, plus they are not actively trying to take over the world lol

Crimson Dynamo 12-01-2010 05:02 PM

"Are monotheistic religions held to higher regard than polytheistic ones"

you know how we should decide this, right?

DrunkerThanMoses 12-01-2010 05:09 PM

I think many gods are more intresting then one god, thats why I think Hindusm is the most intresting relgion with so many differnt gods. I know their fake stories with the hindu gods, but at least their intresting stories, unlike many stories about just one god.

Crimson Dynamo 12-01-2010 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkerThanMoses (Post 2863422)
I think many gods are more intresting then one god, thats why I think Hindusm is the most intresting relgion with so many differnt gods. I know their fake stories with the hindu gods, but at least their intresting stories, unlike many stories about just one god.

nurse, nurse

InOne 12-01-2010 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 2863379)
"Are monotheistic religions held to higher regard than polytheistic ones"

you know how we should decide this, right?

How?

Crimson Dynamo 12-01-2010 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by inone (Post 2863452)
how?

fight

InOne 12-01-2010 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 2863487)
fight

Against what?

Tom 12-01-2010 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InOne (Post 2863492)
Against what?

People v Gods ... then the men with white jackets can cart the people off

InOne 12-01-2010 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom (Post 2863501)
People v Gods ... then the men with white jackets can cart the people off

So people against themselves I guess, as they created the gods.

BB_Eye 12-01-2010 07:24 PM

The spread of Christianity signalled the end of classical antiquity and the beginning of the medieval world. Obviously medieval society seems barbaric compared to our own, but it differed from ancient or pagan cultures in that it accepted all man as equal under God.

Incidentally, the crimes of the African slave trade only began in the 16th century, during the Italian Renaissance when Europe looked back to the Greek pagan/humanistic ideals for inspiration and began to explore the world and destroy everything in their path.

setanta 12-01-2010 07:28 PM

Yep, interesting stuff BB Eye but there's a part of me that misses singing to the sun and howling at the moon.

andyman 12-01-2010 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BB_Eye (Post 2863900)
The spread of Christianity signalled the end of classical antiquity and the beginning of the medieval world. Obviously medieval society seems barbaric compared to our own, but it differed from ancient or pagan cultures in that it accepted all man as equal under God.

Incidentally, the crimes of the African slave trade only began in the 16th century, during the Italian Renaissance when Europe looked back to the Greek pagan/humanistic ideals for inspiration and began to explore the world and destroy everything in their path.

The age of empires, Europe was only doing what the Roman Empire had done and what we still do today..

The medieval world still had its link with the classical past through Rome, Christianity and the laws that spilt into it.. Early medieval Christianity was very political.

BB_Eye 12-01-2010 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyman (Post 2865082)
The age of empires, Europe was only doing what the Roman Empire had done and what we still do today..

I agree that the Romans fit into the same bracket as the Greeks. Colonising and enslaving the known world. Modern Europe (Renaissance and onwards) only repeated the process. This is where the ideals of the Enlightenment humanism failed. The belief that it was our moral burden to "liberate" indigenous cultures and it still carries on in this day and age with America trying to convince the world that they have a right to wage war on countries that don't conform to their liberal democratic model.

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyman (Post 2865082)
The medieval world still had its link with the classical past through Rome, Christianity and the laws that spilt into it.. Early medieval Christianity was very political.

Again, I agree politics was always a dirty business. But even by the worst standards, political dynasties such as the Medici and the Borgias surely take the biscuit. The reign of Pope Alexander VI and Pope Leo X was a time of such unprecedented nepotism and corruption, that it ultimately resulted in the Protestant Schism.

andyman 12-01-2010 10:56 PM

The reformation?

InOne 13-01-2010 09:19 PM

Well also today, even though the historical fact played a big part, it is quite apparent. I think it is all to do with the way people are brought up, especially in the West. I think even if they are Atheist they have still somehow had it drilled into them that monotheism is more important. I mean, it is everywhere growing up and that is why it's always the most debated. Plus monotheistic religion seem to have a more brutal and totalitarian nature than polytheistic ones.

lily. 14-01-2010 09:59 AM

Joe, I can't believe you missed the Harry Hill joke.. lol

NettoSuperstar! 14-01-2010 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InOne (Post 2869524)
Well also today, even though the historical fact played a big part, it is quite apparent. I think it is all to do with the way people are brought up, especially in the West. I think even if they are Atheist they have still somehow had it drilled into them that monotheism is more important. I mean, it is everywhere growing up and that is why it's always the most debated. Plus monotheistic religion seem to have a more brutal and totalitarian nature than polytheistic ones.

Its not the religion in itself, its people, politics, power and greed that cause all the ****. Monotheistic religions are more modern, have more followers= more twats to interpret it for their own ends

Crimson Dynamo 14-01-2010 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NettoSuperstar! (Post 2870641)
Its not the religion in itself, its people, politics, power and greed that cause all the ****. Monotheistic religions are more modern, have more followers= more twats to interpret it for their own ends

and many many more good people to do wonders in its name.

NettoSuperstar! 14-01-2010 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 2870672)
and many many more good people to do wonders in its name.

True..its the people not the book, anyone can use anything to start trouble...Hitler twisted Darwins theory of evolution to create his own ideology and terrible quest for example...the mind sees what it wants to sees

Crimson Dynamo 14-01-2010 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NettoSuperstar! (Post 2870677)
True..its the people not the book, anyone can use anything to start trouble...Hitler twisted Darwins theory of evolution to create his own ideology and terrible quest for example...the mind sees what it wants to sees

..and John Craven uses Countryfile to peddle his filthy wares to an unsuspecting BBC

NettoSuperstar! 14-01-2010 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 2870753)
..and John Craven uses Countryfile to peddle his filthy wares to an unsuspecting BBC

lol exactly

InOne 14-01-2010 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lili (Post 2870637)
Joe, I can't believe you missed the Harry Hill joke.. lol

I'm not down with Mr. Hill lol


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.