ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Should the voting age be lowered to 16? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136312)

Jack_ 07-05-2010 07:06 PM

Should the voting age be lowered to 16?
 
Discuss.

Lucy. 07-05-2010 07:07 PM

Yes. It annoys me that I can't vote till next year when I personally believe I am in the right frame of mind to be able to make an informed decision. If we can have sex which can result in something as big as teen parenthood why can't we vote?

Beastie 07-05-2010 07:08 PM

No. The sprogs can wait ;)

Scarlett. 07-05-2010 07:09 PM

I agree with what Nate said in the Lib Dem thread, there would be some 16 year olds who would be twats and vote BNP and Monster Raving Looney

Smithy 07-05-2010 07:09 PM

Yes
Not necessarily to 16, but if you can drive at 17 surely you should be able to vote.

Although in saying that, I probably wouldn't vote anyway, they're all a bunch of arseholes

Smithy 07-05-2010 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chewy (Post 3215853)
I agree with what Nate said in the Lib Dem thread, there would be some 16 year olds who would be twats and vote BNP and Monster Raving Looney

But saying that it was the Monster Raving Looney Party who originally had the idea to lower it from 21 to 18

Harry! 07-05-2010 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chewy (Post 3215853)
I agree with what Nate said in the Lib Dem thread, there would be some 16 year olds who would be twats and vote BNP and Monster Raving Looney

Maybe they should provide a short sentence saying why they are voting for that party. Any unreasonable reasons there vote wont be counted.

Or maybe have a test to see how mature they are for voting?

Patrick 07-05-2010 07:12 PM

Yes.

16 It should be.

Scarlett. 07-05-2010 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 3215859)
But saying that it was the Monster Raving Looney Party who originally had the idea to lower it from 21 to 18

They also suggest the channel tunnel should become a no fly zone and chocolate should be available on prescription...these guys arent a serious party

Stacey. 07-05-2010 07:14 PM

nah, i think it should be left at 18.

Beastie 07-05-2010 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stacey.x (Post 3215872)
nah, i think it should be left at 18.

Wise words Stacey :)

Smithy 07-05-2010 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chewy (Post 3215868)
They also suggest the channel tunnel should become a no fly zone and chocolate should be available on prescription...these guys arent a serious party

The Chunnel already is a no fly zone :tongue:

I know they aren't a serious party, but they do have a couple of ideas which are good.
But thats all: A couple

Jack_ 07-05-2010 07:19 PM

I very much doubt [under the current system at least] a selection of twatty kids voting for a joke party, would make much difference.

Personally, I find it illogical that some politicians are trying to grasp the attention of young people, yet are against decreasing the voting age.

Harry! 07-05-2010 07:24 PM

You could have a short corse GCSE in Politics introduced into schools. At the time of recieving your offical results in august most students are aged 16 then.

Maybe that should be the way forward?

Shasown 07-05-2010 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 3215859)
But saying that it was the Monster Raving Looney Party who originally had the idea to lower it from 21 to 18

Rubbish. The Monster Raving Loony Party was formed in 1983 by Screaming Lord Sutch (David Sutch - rock musician)

Voting was lowered from 21 to 18 in 1969. Although Lord Sutch under of the banner of The National Teenage party stood against Harold Wilson in Huyton, Lancashire In 1966. Campaigning for legalisation of commerical radio and legalisation of 18 year olds to vote. Lowering the voting age was also mentioned in the Labour Manifesto. Incidentally he didnt get elected.

Believe it or not it was lowered by the Labour Party for the same reasons that they bandied about lowering it to 16. Because they anticipated that 18-21 year olds were more likely to be left wing. In other words re-elect them. Its good to be a pawn isnt it?

When you realise its not about giving you more rights or trusting you its simply about making sure Labour get more votes, then you will be promoted.

So no. I think its wrong to manipulate teenagers






Its good to be the king.

30stone 07-05-2010 07:26 PM

No.

Enid 07-05-2010 07:39 PM

No. Stupid idea. Kids are morons. Hell, most people are morons and should not be allowed to vote.

Spike 07-05-2010 07:39 PM

Yes. I haven't heard a good argument against it being lowered

Callum 07-05-2010 07:40 PM

Yes - I really wanted to vote this year

Stacey. 07-05-2010 07:40 PM

my mum even says she doesn't know much about it, and she's 45. :laugh:

Stephanie 07-05-2010 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stacey.x (Post 3215951)
my mum even says she doesn't know much about it, and she's 45. :laugh:

well that's her own fault lol.

Stacey. 07-05-2010 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephanie (Post 3215954)
well that's her own fault lol.

i know, but she ain't really interested - and just votes for what my dad says to vote for.
so i think 16 is too young for some really.

GypsyGoth 07-05-2010 07:48 PM

I think they should.

setanta 07-05-2010 07:48 PM

What's the age restriction on the XFactor?

Jack_ 07-05-2010 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by setanta (Post 3215957)
What's the age restriction on the XFactor?

16. It was 14 for two years though, iirc.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.