i think the public are hypocrites.
 

howcome nathan is hated for his swearing but john james gets away with swearing just as much if not more sometimes.

so whats the difference between nathan and john james?

Simply because the teenies think ratboy is fit!!!!!

some people you like, some you don't.


:shrug::shrug::shrug:

Because JJ is pretty and vulnerable. Apparently.

He was bullied by Mean girls as he's pointed out several times....just in case the viewers didnt catch it the first time!

Nathan is nasty and a liar. He screamed " I never said you smashed up Steve's char!!" 3 meters from her. He lied and physically threatened her by approaching her WHILE ranting. JJ didn't threaten Rach and most of his rant was about how cheap and shallow it was to openly look forward to "deals" after BB.

JJ does his more sneakily,nathan is just gobby

They think JJ is fit so nobody is allowed to argue with him, he can say what he wants apparently even when he is trying to undermine people and he is even allowed to physically hurt people too.

but rachel is allowed to do what she wants he then cant go and pick on her like that.

"more sneakily" ... like at the dining table in front of everyone? Nath went for the throat and lied. Steve wasn't "gutted" and Nathan DID say "you smashed up his Steve's things" but in the argument with Shabbs he said " no I never!". JJ doesn't lie in those arguments while Nath looks like a wriggling worm who will use every trick in the book including physical intimidating a woman.
Nath didn't look good after that... JJ never went those lengths.

the thing is john james is brutal not honest.

Because the public are stupid!!

But dont worry....watch them turn on the 'awful little turd' JJ....when St. Josie thinks that he's surplus to her gameplan and denounces him!!....Not be long now!....She's already been laying the groundwork for the u-turn!! :dance:

Nathan had ONE short rant. JJ has been an angry ranting, swearing bitch since first week.

You JJ fans are laughable.

Most fans of jj are women, he's very good looking. Nathan isn't. Simple as that really.

but thats stupid because anything he does then his female following is going to defend him.

he was out of line sure, and if he hates a woman who openly says she's looking for a "nutZ" deal then he ought to have bit his lip. But to say this is in the same league as Nath ranting WHILE walking directly towards Shabbs is wrong. The OP's point was "oh boo hoo why can JJ get away with it but Nathan can't".

your missing out half the conversation rachel,corin and ife i think it was were joking about magazine deals and then he singled rachel out and had a right go at her.

Nathan faced off a woman and lied all through it. He yelled at her while quickly walking toward her. SHE felt physically threatened.
JJ's rants with Ben or Josie don't come from the same nasty place that Nathan has had hidden.

Totally agree Zippy.

"he had a right go at her".
?? I already said he was out of line. Are you doing a sunshine and going for 25 apologies?
did her physically threaten her?... how many times did he call her a name? 0 - 0.
Would Rach want make up with JJ ... yes
Would shabbs and Nathan want to make up Nath - no.

Point your not getting is the violence ( physically threatening someone is violence) puts Nathan's handywork in another league.

Lolzzzzz

You make it sound ten times more dramatic than it was! :joker:

I dont think he even got a warning for it. And in BB these days they get warned for the slightest thing. JJ has been warned. Ha!

thats stupid shabby can look after herself for starters and nathan werent that agressive imo.

where as john james constantly was nasty to rachel and was more agressive than nathan.

lol @ "ha!" like someone who's never one anything in their lives and finally wins at the casino.
Shabbs said she was physically threatened. If she stayed in the house he would have got a warning.
JJ didn't get a warning for threatening SS nor did she feel threatened.

spin again.

but rachel he did.

I'm sure JJ got a warning,but can't be sure

Shabs is a proven dramaqueen with an axe to grind. Laughable you take her word seriously. She didnt look threatened at the time. More like a child who had been put in her place and sulking about it.

Ha! :xyxwave: