ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB11 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=551)
-   -   Most HMs not gainfully employed (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=151972)

CaudleHalbard 31-07-2010 11:51 PM

Most HMs not gainfully employed
 
So far as I can see only 3 out of 11 have proper jobs.

Andrew - at uni
Corin - retail worker
Dave - "minister" (hmm!)
Joe-John - boxer and barman (parent's pub) (?)
Jo - make-up artist
John James - unemployed
Josie - ?? (lives on aunt's farm)
Mario - unemployed
Rachel - flight attendant
Sam - unemployed
Steve - unemployed

Great to know my taxes are supporting the majority of them! :rolleyes:

AtomicKitty 01-08-2010 12:27 AM

La crème de la crème

CaudleHalbard 01-08-2010 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicKitty (Post 3591955)
La crème de la crème


Yep! Lol! :D

psychtracker 01-08-2010 12:41 AM

In fairness though, most of them probably gave up their jobs to get on Big Brother, whether part time or whatever. I can't imagine many employer's being happy to hear they might be away for "up to 3 months"...

billy123 01-08-2010 12:46 AM

steve isnt unemployed he is a voluntary worker and a proffesional wheelchair basketball team coach.

CaudleHalbard 01-08-2010 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobnot (Post 3592044)
steve isnt unemployed he is a voluntary worker and a proffesional wheelchair basketball team coach.

I doubt he gets paid for any of his activities - or pays tax.

I don't begrudge him his benefits. But having to support his 8 kids through our taxes is a bit much!

Quote:

Originally Posted by psychtracker (Post 3592025)
In fairness though, most of them probably gave up their jobs to get on Big Brother, whether part time or whatever. I can't imagine many employer's being happy to hear they might be away for "up to 3 months"...

Keeley did this but I suspect the rest have been unemployed for quite a while before applying for BB.

The £100k will make a big difference to their lives, so I don't buy any BS from them about not wanting to win.

billy123 01-08-2010 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 3592056)
I doubt he gets paid for any of his activities - or pays tax.

I don't begrudge him his benefits. But having to support his 8 kids through our taxes is a bit much!

you are still classed as employed if you are a voluntary worker how much if any you are payed for your employment is irrelevant.
He receives an army pension as his income.

pixee 01-08-2010 12:53 AM

Sam gets paid and works as a youth worker running and taking part in various schemes.

He said he doesn't get paid much but has enough to live on.

Please correct me if i'm wrong.

CaudleHalbard 01-08-2010 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobnot (Post 3592068)
you are still classed as employed if you are a voluntary worker how much if any you are payed for your employment is irrelevant.

You can still claim benefits though. And I'll bet a pound to a penny Steve is not paying any tax.

Some of us are voluntary workers in addition to our jobs and we pay tax!

billy123 01-08-2010 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pixee (Post 3592073)
Sam gets paid and works as a youth worker running and taking part in various schemes.

He said he doesn't get paid much but has enough to live on.

Please correct me if i'm wrong.

yes thats right that was an interesting chat sam and steve were having last night about the work they were involved in.

oddballmisfitsFTW 01-08-2010 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 3591776)
So far as I can see only 3 out of 11 have proper jobs.

Andrew - at uni
Corin - retail worker
Dave - "minister" (hmm!)
Joe-John - boxer and barman (parent's pub) (?)
Jo - make-up artist
John James - unemployed
Josie - ?? (lives on aunt's farm)
Mario - unemployed
Rachel - flight attendant
Sam - unemployed
Steve - unemployed

Great to know my taxes are supporting the majority of them! :rolleyes:


no your taxes have all been stolen by the banks :elephant:

billy123 01-08-2010 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 3592082)
You can still claim benefits though. And I'll bet a pound to a penny Steve is not paying any tax.

Some of us are voluntary workers in addition to our jobs and we pay tax!

completely irrelevant to the topic of your thread but he receives an army pension not benefits as his main source of income.

CaudleHalbard 01-08-2010 12:56 AM

Sam is described as an "unemployed graffiti artist".

He probably gets expenses or whatever for his "youth work". Most likely he depends on benefits.

psychtracker 01-08-2010 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 3592056)
Keeley did this but I suspect the rest have been unemployed for quite a while before applying for BB. The £100k will make a big difference to their lives, so I don't buy any BS from them about not wanting to win.

There's your answer though...you "suspect". ie you don't actually know.

I don't begrudge anyone getting 100K for putting themselves under the microscope for 3 months in front of 2 million pple, or whatever. Think how much money BB must of made over the 10 years from sponsorship, advertising etc...

100K is peanuts!!! ...here in Australia, our winner got $1 million dollars a few years back got (550K quid).

pixee 01-08-2010 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 3592082)
You can still claim benefits though. And I'll bet a pound to a penny Steve is not paying any tax.

Some of us are voluntary workers in addition to our jobs and we pay tax!

Steve may get a variety of benefits (although not all ex service men who were injured get well treated by the army) due to the fact he was severly injured while serving in the army.

I wouldn't imagine you begrudge him been on benefits given the fact until he was blown up he was in full time employment as a british soldier.

CaudleHalbard 01-08-2010 12:59 AM

Quote:

he receives an army pension not benefits as his main source of income
I expect he gets something from the army - but it can't be much because he got blown up when as 19 didn't he? He would not have had enough service to earn any significant pension.

His main source of income, especially with 8 kids, must undoubtedly be state benefits. Probably a pretty huge amount.

billy123 01-08-2010 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 3592101)
I expect he gets something from the army - but it can't be much because he got blown up when as 19 didn't he? He would not have had enough service to earn any significant pension.

His main source of income, especially with 8 kids, must undoubtedly be state benefits. Probably a pretty huge amount.

no as a serviceman injured in the line of duty he would receive the full pension upon his discharge regardless of length of service.

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question...8044942AA0wNty

pixee 01-08-2010 01:04 AM

Also doesn't Mario have a rich mother? and isn't actually British?

cookiemonster 01-08-2010 02:46 AM

i'm so sick and tired of people going "our taxes are going to them". you have to pay taxes regardless so why moan about it? if you're unhappy with your life, do something about it!

mandyj 01-08-2010 02:48 AM

jo is also unemployed

AusFan 01-08-2010 04:00 AM

Corin is unemployed too.

Peter Plunker 01-08-2010 10:35 AM

Any employer is going to struggle to release an employee for up to three months. Most people live to their means so couldn't afford the loss of pay. I also wonder if the people on benefits have declared their £30 per day earnings from BB?

fingers 01-08-2010 10:47 AM

Some of the housemates, notably Mario, are constantly reminding others e.g. "day 50 that's £1500!" so their minds are on how much they stand to make the longer they stay.

wilful_woodpecker 01-08-2010 10:52 AM

"I suspect"
"probably"
"I bet"
"must undoubtedly be"

hmmmmmmm: that's facts is it?

Visage 01-08-2010 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Plunker (Post 3592592)
Any employer is going to struggle to release an employee for up to three months. Most people live to their means so couldn't afford the loss of pay.

That's how I see it. My employer wouldn't allow me three months off to do something like this. Not that I would wanna do something like this.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.