Playing the game and chickening out
 

So for the last two weeks straight, Steve has nominated John James and Josie, yet when he won the save and replace task he put up Andrew. Now as I said in another thread the reason for this is obvious, ie. anyone who puts up Josie will be guarenteed at least 2 nominations the following week from her and John James bt more then likely one from Andrew as well giving a toal of three which can be enough to put you up for the public vote.

So does this not prove that Steve is in fact clearly playing a game despite all his claims otherwise. Also he constantly goes on about team players but what does it say about him when he throws a 19 year old kid into a public vote cause he dosen't have the guts to take on Josie ?

Andrew was the easy option wasn't he.

He was indeed, and don't get me wrong I wouldn't have picked Josie either as that would have bitten him in the ass, but for someone who claims to have no game plan I find it strange he hasn't made any attempt to explain his actions. Maybe he thinks the public are thick

The Baron my backside, Josie has much more power in that house

Yeah your right. Too bad he had to win last week or he'd have gone.

He'll regret not putting Josie up last week.

I don't think so, Josie would have beaten the vote and he then would have been nominated by John James, Josie and Andrew which would have seen him up

True. maybe he ain't so dumb, unlike moi.

He probably thinks that everyone else will be voting Josie out so he nominates her then but won't do it to her face because then he would be singled out & if she goes out then, JJ1 will turn on him.

They're all playing a game. It's the only way to survive in the BB house.

I see Mario has taken the safe option as well in picking Dave