![]() |
JJ1 got Rachael out in week one.
Rachael had the last laugh and was instrumental into hitting the hardest and getting that mongrel John "EXCUSE for everything" James out at the last eviction night before the finals!
BWAHAHAHAHA!, Sweet karma. Dear Davina, no he was NOT the the best housemate, he was the WORSE housemate ever, and made it a nightmare for everyone else. No man who refers to a woman as a prositute can ever be class as good, and to make matters worse after bragging about it, cry about what he said when he found out her boyfriend is Nathan. Was Davina ordered not to talk about that incident or what? |
Davina made me sick how many times she called him a brilliant housemate, AND SAM AND CORIN WERNT? They were far more enjoyable to watch thank you very much!
|
Davina is on crack!
|
I got Rachael out - she was/is an effing horror
|
Rachael got him out!!!
He was such a VILE Person. I hope he reads this or DS and hopefully he will GET FOOKED!!! I think John James is the most NASTIEST BULLY of BB an is in one of my top 5 most ever HATED!! |
Quote:
|
I dont think he meant that she was an out and out prostitute....but more that her behaviour was like prostituting herself. And i agree.
There are many ways to prostitute yourself other than via a sex for money encounter. To be in a relationship to invite fame and cash reward is a form of prostitution, whether sex is offered or not. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
PS - John stayed weeks and survived evictions - the horror didn't |
Quote:
Nathan and Rachael has not done that yet. But John has hinted at doing that. But of course he will give the money to Josie :sleep: |
Quote:
He BRAGGED about the things he said to her, and the way he referred to her as a prostitute and then went crying like a baby when he found out she was dating Nathan, this is what killed him off. |
Quote:
|
Who got evicted early Hero1? Was it that slag Rachael then Nathan?
|
Quote:
|
I think the psychologists must have hinted that Davina and the production team have to tiptoe around John James because he was about to crack. They were lenient on him, which I don't think he entirely deserved. of course I don't want anyone to suffer from psychological problems because of BB, but he obviously had issues before he went in.
John James is the one and only who has been hitting nails into his own coffin. |
John James didn't call her a prostitute, he said prostitution was the one thing she wouldn't do....
And he was a good housemate because he stirred stuff up and made things happen - regardless of whether or not he's a good person, he was a good housemate because he actually did stuff that they could make a show out of. |
Quote:
On his highlights, as well as missing out of 99.9 percent of his arguments and him blabbering like a baby, they pulled out two funny things about him, when Joise questioned if he manhood was really that small or when he drew a fake willy on his leg in the DR.....but that was down to Josie and her humour really! What did JJ do to be classed as entertaining, and to me slagging off WEAK housemates who really do not deserve it is not entertaining! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
We :love: Rachael
|
Quote:
Dont get me wrong, good luck to anyone who gets their 15mins and makes a mint from it. I just have no respect for those that lower their morals to attain fame. But saying that..one persons morals can be different to anothers and it is how we are brought up i guess. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The public got Rachael out in Week one. If they didn't agree with John James, they could've voted either Shabby or Sunshine more in order to try and keep Rachael in. John James didn't vote her out.
|
how did John James put the horror out in the first week did he have a phone to vote for her to go :conf: The voting public put her out as they could see she was desperate for fame :xyxwave:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.