ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB11 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=551)
-   -   why did the public like boring freaks in bb11? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=159920)

Mystic Mock 30-08-2010 03:11 PM

why did the public like boring freaks in bb11?
 
alot of you hated the normal entertaining people like ben,josie and andrew but loved the boring childish freaks like sam,shabby,caoimhe and even mario.

and i dont get why? and before anybody says anything about putting ben as normal,the only thing that makes him different from the everyday person is that his got money.

chris1232 30-08-2010 03:19 PM

Cos most of them are boring sods.

Lex 30-08-2010 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3737362)
alot of you hated the normal entertaining people like ben,josie and andrew but loved the boring childish freaks like sam,shabby,caoimhe and even mario.

and i dont get why? and before anybody says anything about putting ben as normal,the only thing that makes him different from the everyday person is that his got money.

Agreed Jedward! :xyxwave:

MTVN 30-08-2010 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3737362)
alot of you hated the normal entertaining people like ben,josie and andrew but loved the boring childish freaks like sam,shabby,caoimhe and even mario.

and i dont get why? and before anybody says anything about putting ben as normal,the only thing that makes him different from the everyday person is that his got money.

Dont agree with this at all.

First of all, Sam was quite childish sometimes, but, love or hate him, he livened up a house that was becoming increasingly dull

I would hardly call Caiomhe and Mario childish either. And labelling them "freaks"? They weren't at all, how were they freaks?

Ben having money is not the reason people think he is different, and I'm a fan of Ben. He is quite an odd guy, but thats not to do with his money, it's to do with his lack of teamwork, his insistence on being "individualist", being incredibly tactile, and just his general mannerisms and behaviour tbh, but that's why I loved the guy :hugesmile:

Saph 30-08-2010 07:38 PM

i dont agree that Sam and Shabby were boring but I really dont get why people liked Mario :s

I dont care about any BB11 housemates anymore, UBB has been much more entertaining in 4 days than BB11 was in 77.

DrunkerThanMoses 30-08-2010 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3737362)
alot of you hated the normal entertaining people like ben,josie and andrew but loved the boring childish freaks like sam,shabby,caoimhe and even mario.

and i dont get why? and before anybody says anything about putting ben as normal,the only thing that makes him different from the everyday person is that his got money.

Ben did nothing but bitch
Josie did nothing but eat and have a showmance with whats his face
andrew? :sleep:

Sam was fun and entertaing, but I do fell hes a tad over rated.
Shabby was okay, and amde the show intresting
Coamhie was a great cold hearted bitch
and mario was jsut the best one there :p

LexDex 30-08-2010 07:44 PM

What really bored me was that that BB11 turned into the "John James & Josie" show!
What was that all about? JJ1 was arrogant and vile and Josie naive, I did not see any real romance! Just JJ1 leading Josie on and being nasty to others. The only one who was entertaining was Corin.

icecakes 30-08-2010 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3737362)
alot of you hated the normal entertaining people like ben,josie and andrew but loved the boring childish freaks like sam,shabby,caoimhe and even mario.

and i dont get why? and before anybody says anything about putting ben as normal,the only thing that makes him different from the everyday person is that his got money.

laying down 24/7, sucking her thumb,wispering under the duvet,making crude remarks, porridge tastes like sp**k,wetting her knickers very entertaining, not

THE WATCHER 30-08-2010 10:45 PM

freaky hippo and freaky roo were the worst

Sammi_Who 31-08-2010 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3737362)
alot of you hated the normal entertaining people like ben,josie and andrew but loved the boring childish freaks like sam,shabby,caoimhe and even mario.

and i dont get why? and before anybody says anything about putting ben as normal,the only thing that makes him different from the everyday person is that his got money.

Andrew? :joker: I totally disgree with him being entertaining. He was a gameplaying actor. He wanted to showmance, Joise and even Mario didnt play along. The relavations of water melons etc was completely desperate. His acting skills were illustrated in various secret missions that showed him for what he was. Playing the Glyn BB7 "journey" card which thankfully didnt work! :hugesmile:

I agree with Ben being entertaining. But had shabby/caoimhe not been in there, they wouldnt have had a story for the first few weeks. Not just between themselves but the firery relationship with other HMs. You had shabby kicking off at pretty much everyone, then Caoimhe later falling out with Josie and Dave. Similarily with Sam, had he not gone in. Omg BORING! Nothing would have happened in the last few weeks either.

The problem with the house this year, is aside from JJ, the arguably most entertaining HMs that ruffeled a few feathers, were bloody outsed because they wanted an easy atmosphere for their stay.Or maybe to increase their own chances of winning. Which is ridiculous for the public, when youre watching an entertainment show. The house would have been as boring as that last few days of the "finalist" if it wasnt for those characters. It should be damned for exactly the opposite reasons, why does the public play along with the house and evict the most controversal characters? BB knew the bigger characters were the ones that would be evicted in that last eviction, and still went ahead with a vote to evict. Going out with a band my a***! :mad:

Mystic Mock 31-08-2010 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sammi_Who (Post 3741547)
Andrew? :joker: I totally disgree with him being entertaining. He was a gameplaying actor. He wanted to showmance, Joise and even Mario didnt play along. The relavations of water melons etc was completely desperate. His acting skills were illustrated in various secret missions that showed him for what he was. Playing the Glyn BB7 "journey" card which thankfully didnt work! :hugesmile:

I agree with Ben being entertaining. But had shabby/caoimhe not been in there, they wouldnt have had a story for the first few weeks. Not just between themselves but the firery relationship with other HMs. You had shabby kicking off at pretty much everyone, then Caoimhe later falling out with Josie and Dave. Similarily with Sam, had he not gone in. Omg BORING! Nothing would have happened in the last few weeks either.

The problem with the house this year, is aside from JJ, the arguably most entertaining HMs that ruffeled a few feathers, were bloody outsed because they wanted an easy atmosphere for their stay.Or maybe to increase their own chances of winning. Which is ridiculous for the public, when youre watching an entertainment show. The house would have been as boring as that last few days of the "finalist" if it wasnt for those characters. It should be damned for exactly the opposite reasons, why does the public play along with the house and evict the most controversal characters? BB knew the bigger characters were the ones that would be evicted in that last eviction, and still went ahead with a vote to evict. Going out with a band my a***! :mad:

i think andrew is better than sam and shabby because he didnt have to use gimmicks.

Sammi_Who 31-08-2010 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3741597)
i think andrew is better than sam and shabby because he didnt have to use gimmicks.

Sam didnt really use a gimmic, and shabbys "artful dodger" was about clothes. She never hid who she was or her emotions, regardless of how stupid shs looked kicking off.

I knew Andrew would "reflect" on how much confidence he's developed through his stay at the house. He didnt. He still looked awkward.

The geek to chic "journey" was a gimmic. He pretended he didnt even know how to boil an egg in the last weeks..remind you of anyone! He's a student for crying out loud, and yet says he doesnt know how to boil an egg. ****** o*f Andrew! The little sexual experience he had, became a gimmic in itself. If you dont agree for enough, but Andrew imo had one of the biggest gimmics in the house.

Macie Lightfoot 31-08-2010 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3741597)
i think andrew is better than sam and shabby because he didnt have to use gimmicks.

Andrew's whole ****ing storyline was a gimmick and already laid out from the second he walked into the House. It was a gimmick, it wasn't entertaining, deal with it.

Mystic Mock 31-08-2010 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by troynuncdicit (Post 3741684)
Andrew's whole ****ing storyline was a gimmick and already laid out from the second he walked into the House. It was a gimmick, it wasn't entertaining, deal with it.

it proves sam wasnt funny because his fans are moaning about him not being funny on twitter.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.