Kate Moss' - and her saggy wrinkly backside
 

Seriously.....how the hell is Kate Moss still classed as model material.

In this picture: there is a woman of 45 and a woman of 56 who are look far better than Moss - her arse and legs are a complete mess (along with the rest of her).

Moss is in the centre. What a state.

I saw this the other day - can't believe she's considered to be a super model, but then I've never understood what people see in her. She'll soon be the wrong side of 40 and she'd not ageing very well is she? Compare her to the likes of Twiggy and Janice Dickinson, ages 61 and 56 respectively and imagine what state she'll be in by the time she's their age:eek:

See the catty women are out in force. Sad how women are the first to attack each other over looks.

She's been a model for 22 years and is still one of the highest paid models in the world.
A fact that overshadows anything you two have to say given that you don't pay for her services. She's worth whatever those who hire her are willing to pay. At this point its her name and face that commands her huge fees. Not her ass.

It's not her ass that you see on the cover of Vogue.

Exactly.....and as the photos show... she's a mess. Look at this vs the likes of Elle McPherson, Cindy Crawford - older and far more beautiful in every way.

Her face, unphotoshopped, would never make it onto the cover of Vogue.


BTW - I see you do wonderful show of being catty yourself - highly ironic to berate others for the very same thing you yourself are guilty of in your post above - shows how hypocritical you are - it's incredibly amusing. ;)

I'm not being catty in the post above unless youre saying that me pointing out your cattiness is catty? Which is just silly.

glad youre amused. Maybe it will distract you from bitching about other womens looks. :xyxwave:

Ah... the same way that you just bitched about Lynda Carter in your thread about who the hell has a body (waist) like that...... but then deleted it............ (you had to, otherwise you'd be seen as being so contradictory and critical yourself eh by coming back onto this thread with that particular comment.........when you yourself had just posted an equally bitchy comment on L.Carter's body) PMSL. I was pointing out your hypocrisy. ;)

guess what.... I've got an opinion Zippy - and I'll post that opinion where I see fit on whatever subject. Sorry you don't like that but hey, that's the way the cookie crumbles.

It seems other people can't have an opinion on here unless it jives with their own - how sad and pathetic is that? Just ignore the sad, think they know it all (but actually know nothing) poorly educated, sexist fools, they're not worthy of a response, since all they know how to do is make offensive, rude and/or sarcastic personal attacks on other FMs.

Quite. Given that Ms Moss is a very public figure: whose very body is her business as a model - I have every right to make comment on the awful condition her body is in without being berated for giving that opinion.

Kate Moss is long past her best in the modelling world....... without modern technology fixing her up - she'd be washed up long ago.

I removed a few posts, can we stick to the topic of the thread please and stop with the personal remarks.

Second from the left is best.

this is why she still commands huge fees. No new model can get this attention on the catwalk. Her presence, her name. She is a living legend in the fashion world. One unflattering shot of her arse doesn't negate all that. Ignorance.

http://vybzmagazine.com/wp-content/g...on_Week_05.jpg

Never got the hype with her or Claudia Schiffer but hey Kate is one of the few remaining from the true "supermodel" era so hey they have to cherish her, like music cherishes musicians of years past no matter how wrinkly and hoarse voiced they have gotten..

She's 37 not 67 - she's not supposed to be wrinkly for a while yet:laugh:

I have actually never seen kate moss as attractive. But then a lot of supermodels arent, usually they are hired for their tall skinny firm bodies above all else. But kate seems to be losing that now too :/

Not that it will matter anyways, I would think her name makes more cash than her actual work these days. That and her face on fashion magazines...

exactly. If they just wanted a perfect body they'd hire a 20 year old bikini model. Not that Kate was ever a bikini model. Bodywise, she defied the odds of what a supermodel should look like physically just by being short. So obviously she compensated for it in other ways.

What's ignorance? Acknowledging the fact that Kate the model has 56 year old woman and others older than her, putting her to shame as far as the condition and state her body is in? nah... that's not ignorance, it's fact.

I agree. Her name brings in the cash these days - clearly her body isn't in any good nick for modelling any longer.

As for her face - again, it's got to be digitially enhanced beyond all recognition for it to appear in the glossy mags. Anyone had a real look at the state of her skin, the mess her teeth are in - the shots that the paps get.

A great role model she is not: she is however a great advert for not partying your life away, getting pissed and being out of your face and living the 'rock chic' lifestyle.

Each to their own! We have chubby chasers, why not flabby arse chasers?

Do you?

thats nice, dear.

This is true of nearly all celebs though. Not many actually look how they appear in the magazines, and most of those that do have had surgery, or wear truckloads of makeup to look like that :laugh:

They are all just normal people, just enhanced.

How utterly patronising. :sleep:

aha.. but not every celeb is a model. If someone is modelling on a catwalk at the level of Kate Model 'Supermodel', it's fair and reasonable to assume that said model's body would be at least in half decent nick.

Body on a model... yes. I was referring to magazines and that :tongue:

Given that the thread is about the nick of the body of a model, modelling on the catwalk........ ;)

Yesssss

And my reply was to a part of a post you made about her FACE, not body...

'As for her face - again, it's got to be digitially enhanced beyond all recognition for it to appear in the glossy mags. Anyone had a real look at the state of her skin, the mess her teeth are in - the shots that the paps get.'

:wink: