Can THESE be added to the swear censorship?
 

should of > should have
would of > would have
could of > could have

The grammatically-challenged users will soon learn and it won't annoy some members (including me) when we read this Earth-shattering mistake of grammar when it comes up.

Sorry to be a pr!ck. :laugh:

No.

Sounds like a good idea to me :thumbs:

No *wants to correct people's bad english*

I approve of this.

And if I see one more apostrophe in a plural in Novo's posts I'm going to sacrifice a Rangers fan.

:laugh:

- hopes it's firewire -

We have been waiting for a new forum skin form skin for ages....

wut

adding these to the censorship is much easier.

:nono:

I'd rather have a new forum skin than censoring things like this.

lmao chewy :joker:

:laugh:

yeah but it'd take two minutes to do this censorship.

But there's no point, a skin's a way better addition to the forum.

I'm just wondering if there are any circumstances where 'should of' would be a correct form. The only example I can think would be something like:

"Yes, Lesley should of course be evicted."

but then again that should technically be:

"Yes, Lesley should, of course, be evicted."

This.

Stop complaining Phlip :nono:

You should OF PM'd an admin if its bothering you that much.

There is nothing wrong with writing things like should of, it is faster than writing it the other way.. An it's not like we're doing a test :bored:

of course could be censored to of course. lol maybe that'd work.
both can be added.

That's the most tenuous excuse for "I want to remain stupid" I've heard.

Actually, I've changed my mind, and I agree.

*English hehe :love:

<_<

Sounds like a very good excuse for people that aren't arsed how people type on a forum

That shouldn't even be caps :bored: