How long does it take....
 

to have your "appeals" dealt with on that new thread where you dispute any infractions/bans?

do you let them know the decision either way?

and how busy is it? :joker:

They're usually answered pretty quick (assuming a mod is online) and it's not too busy

Very much depends on whos on and what time you post there. Usually within the hour

mine was really quick :amazed:

i got a 3 point infraction coz i posted a gif of some gay kid dancing and the mods thought it was a member here :joker:

Mine are answered within seconds

sssshhhhhhhh you:nono: :joker:

My two threads have been deleted :crazy:

Never had a problem, so don't need to go there

Considering one was just a photo of john locke and the other was asking us to vote for Afghanistan in the globalvision(even though you failed to enter :nono: ) I would say they were deleted for a reason :tongue:

Out of respect for the recently deceased Bin Laden I decided against entering Globalvision

:laugh2:

well Ive heard nothing so is that a no?

If you mean your most recent one, I answered you 3 mins after you posted it 0_o

:joker::joker::joker::joker::joker: :joker::joker::joker::joker::joker::joker:

Jayman.

:laugh3: :laugh2: :laugh3: :laugh2: :laugh3:

LMFAO.

Oh.... I thought doing that was an automatic permaban - not just a couple of infraction points. :conf:

Seems that it was sorted if it turned out it wasn't though so that's good.

Legend. :joker:

They thought it was a member, but it wasn't it was just someone who looked like a member

Yeah we sorted it almost straight away so no need to question it

LOL I didnt know you answered on the actual thread. I was waiting for a PM. Sat there waiting all day crying becuase of the injustice of it all..

lol awwwwww

Heh, Im sure you did :tongue:

:joker:

I think there's a bit of misunderstanding. I realise that they'd thought it was a member, but turns out, it wasn't.

Just when I read Scott saying he'd received 3 infraction points for (allegedly) posting such a gif - I was under the impression that that is a permaban - which then Scott would have queried (rightly as it turns out, even though he was given 3 points and not a 'ban' ) ..... It's muddied the waters but hey, good that it was sorted out quickly though. :)

Posting photos of other members without their permission is a straight ban. Not necessarily permanent though, the most recent member permabanned for that was a bit of an extreme case.

However, this happened before that rule was in place :)