![]() |
Dowlers' fury at '£3.5 million payoff' for Rebekah Brooks
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1SMEa1can
Quote:
|
omg I wish they would piss off now. I know its sad about there daughter or w/e but just go away off my tv >:l
and rebekah brooks can piss off to with her stupid name. |
The NOTW didn't kill their daughter. Her financial gain has nothing to do with them.
It was always going to happen, there was probably some legal stuff behind her leaving that meant she needed some money. And the NOTW is part of a large organisation so it's to be expected. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If she really didn't know what was going on at her own newspaper, she should have been sacked. If she did know it was happening, she should have been sacked. Whichever way you look at it, her being awarded £3.5m is a slap in the face not only to the victims of the phone hacking scandal, but also to the people at NOTW who had nothing to do with the hacking and lost their jobs anyway. How much do we think those people will be getting? |
I doubt anyone in any other walk of life would be in line for any pay off especially when under investigation by the Police.
Also in other walks of life,people who resign and leave lose any pay off they would have been entitled to normally. The Dowlers are naturally angry, Rebekah Brookes is either a good liar or incompetent,either way she should not get this pay off at all but certainly not until,or more to the point 'if' she is totally cleared of any wrongdoing or major blame after the full Police investigation. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
However unfair it seems or upsetting it is to the Dowling family or any other victims of this, its really no surprise. Brookes was always going to get an obscene payout if she was forced to resign, you can't reach the level she was at without being in a win, win situation, in terms of her employment contract. Its stupid to think she would have walked away with nothing and her head hung in shame. She's not the only person to act badly and walk away with a wadge of cash she doesn't deserve (look at the bank execs), that's just the way it is. At least she's gone
|
I still think it should not be paid until after all the investigations. Whatever happened to no prizes for failure.
|
Quote:
It's the poor wot gets the blame and the rich wot gets the pleasure ..... :hmph: |
I don't think it's stupid to hope she would walk away with nothing. Of course people in her position are in a win/win situation but this story is big enough to perhaps bring about a change. It's not only the victims of the newspaper's collective greed and dishonesty who are angry, the public is angry. I know the public is angry because, for example, just one of the MPs I work with has received over three hundred letters this week from constituents demanding the government do something. That's not counting the telephone calls and the emails. To say "it always happens" doesn't make it any easier to swallow for anyone.
|
It's pointless getting angry over it, it was apart of her contract. She was always going to get it.
|
Quote:
It's also good to know the public are making their views and anger on this very strongly to their MPs too. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.