Harry being nominated because of his fox hunting
 

They shouldn't be allowed. Bull**** noms that have got nothing to do with what has happened in the house.

He did speak about fox hunting in the house though tbh, And it might disgust people..

Not to mention theirs what we haven't seen, and if the way he acted to pamela is anything, then their reasons are valid..


Even if it was to look good in the public eye, it still happened, it still might of made people sick / angry / upset, and is a valid point.

Fox hunting is banned. Everyone feels so strongly about it that they don't even know that? He might used to hunt, but not any more.

Bet he still does though! but a piss poor reason to nominate him!

There are far too many sabs watching hunts for them to do it and get away with it for any length of time. They can drag hunt...

I think they used it as an excuse to out the posh boy. It's okay to take the pee out of someone because of their background because they consider them to be posh. If they did the same to someone else because they were working class, or ethnic, or homosexual, people would be outraged.

The housemates want to look good in the public eye. It's ridiculous, you shouldn't nominate someone for something on the outside.

Unfortunately, foxes have to be controlled. If they didn't shoot them, they'd poison them, which is a far worse death than a bullet.

i would have nominated him for that if i was in there tbh

and its a better reason than what that other gave"because i watched him eat a egg and i dont like eggs"

and its a better reason than what that other gave"because i watched him eat a egg and i dont like eggs"

:joker::joker::joker::joker::joker:

Oh I totally agree, I actually live in a rural area and have firearms licences myself (prepares to get flamed). I misunderstood, I thought you meant it has been banned outright.

They still can chase the fox on horse back though, only they can't have a whole pack of dogs any more, only two, they also can't dig the fox out, once/if it goes to ground its hunt over. What normally happens is, the fox runs until its exhausted, and just stops running and they have to shoot it, whereas before the ban they would let the dogs kill it.
It still is an absolutely disgusting and barbaric practise, and has no place in a modern society.
What you describe above is vermin control, and is perfectly acceptable IMO and also necessary.

I think it is more than reason enough to nominate him. I think he is obviously a sick individual and I would have concerns for the other housemates so I really hope he does go.

Fair enough for 1 round of nominations but it shouldnt be allowed again.

Fair left the building along with humanity when it comes to such perversion.

Eh...thats a bit much don't ya think? Its not like he has his shotgun in the house with him or anything.

Mores the pity:joker:

Foxes are gross anyway.

Not really and I certainly would not trust him to look after children. Would you trust him?

you never know that might have been his 1 luxury item :joker::joker:

Compared to what humans? :conf:

Better than that was Mark's additional comment along the lines of "he consumed it like it wasn't even there"

*Still trying to get my head round that one!!!* :hugesmile:

Alex is the only one you should have concerns for. He might mistake her for some animal-based experiment that went wrong.

Are you serious? He hunts foxes not people...


I bloody well hope so, we'd have an interesting "Dodge the buckshot task" if he did

I live in the country myself, three miles from the nearest village. Everyone I know has a shotgun. I come from London though, and until you live in the countryside you really have no idea about foxes or animal control. I didn't when I moved here. Hunting with dogs for fun though... like you say disgusting and barbaric.

What a ridiculous thing to say.

didn't some change to hunting a bloke running round the country side dragging a aniseed bag behind him?

not sure what happened when they got him :joker::joker:

yes. well done.