Nick Bateman knows why he was kicked off Katy Price Show
 

Nick Bateman blogs "I am surprised to see Jay finishing so high. After being kicked off the Katy Price show, he should not of even reached the second round of Big Brother auditions. I know exactly why he was kicked off and hopefully the press do too and that it all comes out soon like one of his smelly farts."

http://bigbrotherveteran.blogspot.co...future-of.html

that's better.

Hope we get to find out soon

Oh God, hate it when people declare that they know something and make it out to be a big deal but then won't tell anyone what it is :bored:

This is probably about as accurate as his voting leak which had Faye being evicted over Anton and Aden

I really want to know what he was kicked off katie Prices show for now

I think many of us are aware of a certain type of record, and not perhaps of the musical variety may be pretty close to home.

To be fair, Nick can't really devulge can he, the next best thing he can do is state he knows and give a hint as to it being bad enough that Jay shouldn't have gone so far on BB, probably why he says 'he hopes' it comes out soon. Given the interest it caused on forums when Jay was kicked off Katie Price's show, many will still be interested to know, I know I will, curiosity getting the better of me. I hope we find out soonish.

Allegedly he does have some sort of criminal record.

That doesn't make sense :conf:

Read it again...... and think about what I would say if it wouldn't be regarded as pretty much libel..... I wouldn't think it fair to put it over any other way really.

That really wouldn't surprise me in the least. Maybe that was why BB was pushing so hard for him to win, which didn't happen thankfully, as they might have had plenty of scope for their associated mags and rags to build on with Jay stuff? probably the sort of stuff they love for their mags and rags. I thought the pushing from the likes, of what a nice lad Jay is and a softie at heart was a bit contrived/weird at times.

Doesn't make grammatical sense, funny that you go mental over Jay's Mum saying Aaron has gone back on his deal yet you're happy to go around saying Jay has a criminal record with no proof :joker:

Ooooh.... some please knock Nick over so he can spill the beans.....!

*waits in anticipation*

Superb blog from Nick. He really is passionate about the show that made him (well it made him about £1.7m - the good old days when ex-BB HMs could cash in eg Jade, Kate, Brian D, Craig). I think BB4 killed off the big pay days.

In last weeks New magazine Jay's mum said he got kicked off KP cos they found he had a criminal record he had lied about. Ma Waggott claims Jay's GF did the crime and he took the blame and the conviction , yeah right :joker:

MTVN: I am beyond posting something as libellous because it may have reparcutions for Tibb. That is why it was worded in the way it was: less to do with grammatically correct, and more to do with not putting Tibb in any hot water. I'd have thought that as a mod, you would have appreciated the reasons why I chose that route - rather than come right out with such an accusation outright - as well as your attempt at mocking me - for being careful in my wording - out of respect for the forum owner.

That said: perhaps you might wish to note Cheddarcakes' more detailed comment.

That always makes me laugh for some reason :joker:

Well it's pretty clear what you're implying, and yes it probably isn't a particularly clever thing to say when you seem to have no basis for your accusation, I have also looked on New magazine's website and can't see any interview with Jay's Mum

Yes :blush:

The reason why Jay was kicked off the Katy Price show still remains a mystery unfortunately :xyxwave:

I liked Nick in BB1. He played the BB game, and got chucked off :( But it brought a lot of attention to BB, so BB should be thankful to him for that. Nick was a good housemate, funny and engrossing.

Differnce was, I didn't say it was true or not, I made no accusation, as was very clear in careful wording. You are taking issue with me only - yet I AM NOT the only person on the thread who has made mention of this. In fact, I'm one of the few who has been very careful in the wording, yet I am the only one you are making such a big deal over it.

May I please ask why I am being selectively chosen rather than you addressing others who are doing more than I have?

Because you were the only one who'd said such a thing when I originally commented :wavey:

I think he refused to marry KP- she wasn't disco enough or into scat.

No accusations were made or for that matter really even implied. The posts are all hearsay, no more no less, members are just discussing it in this thread. And even if things are put in such a way in posts, unless said outright, then I see no reason for umbridge taken because some interpret posts they want to and always will do no matter what. Nothing wrong with 'carefully' constructed posts. Lawyers, Politicians, etc; do so all the time with policies and such.