criticising the housemate you think is the cause of an argument
 

People on this board and on BBOTS criticise housemates for starting arguments yet at the same time say how the fighting episode was the best one so far. This seems bizarre. If the person who you think caused the fighting didn't do what you felt they did to cause the argument it wouldn't have been as good to watch.

The episodes where they all get on can be bit boring unless there's something really funny that happens. It's the arguments and the fighting that provide the most entertainment. So therefore it makes little sense to criticise the person you think caused the argument. On Mondays episode, If you thought Denise was to blame then congratulations to Denise. If you thought it was Karissa to blame then well done Karissa. Whoevers fault it was for starting the argument deserves the most credit for creating the entertainment.
Like when that Pete Burns creature said that it was Karissa to blame for not getting Denises humour and americans should be banned. Yet we all agree and I'm sure Pete Burns agrees that Mondays episode was one of the best ones yet. Had she got Denises humour it would have been a crap episode. I'm glad she didn't get Denises humour. And I'm glad Denise acts stupid when drunk. These are GOOD THINGS.

It's like going to a boxing match and getting mad at one of the boxers for punching the other guy.

It's a discussion forum. It's for discussing what's gone on. It's not a difficult concept. What would you like us to talk about, penguin?

making fun of their stupidity

It's a reality show.

Everyone on here is aware that the episodes with the aggro are the most fun to watch and receive the most comments. So what, exactly, is your point?

Some people particularly on BBOTS seem to get mad and want certain housemates out of the house for causing a fight. If they get rid of those housemates we will be left with a boring house. Then the same people will complain about the house being boring. It's like with the Andrew Stone thing. When he was up for eviction, not enough people voted to keep him in. Now everyone is saying how if he was still in the house it would be interesting to see how he would fit in with the current dynamic of the house. It seems like they should have kept him in then?
It's one thing to talk about the fights but another to want to get a HM out for causing one.

This IS BB....its all about watching people interact...its watching peoples behaviour and this forum is for us to discuss that behaviour.
It was the best episode on CBB ever....and look at the debate it opened up. I loved reading peoples views on it yesterday and likewise I like the whole debate.