cap on benefits
 

cap benefits

who was it under that "right to buy" was introduced,
were all the gold property's snapped up and counsel stocks reduced.
did the byers take a risk or gamble,
or did the low paid, get the right to hand ball.
as you can see the shortage is mega,
but for the ones that bought, got out of being a beggar.
with up to 70% off it was a grab a snatch a deal,
we are all now paying for it,and its real.
every government has stopped building,
but the amount of space leaves us fielding.
you can not have areas that discriminate,
because under current laws, your legal bill will accumulate.
if rent costs the government, then they should provide,
but if you cap benefits to areas, bigger will be the social divide.
no-one should be claiming more then a well paid job,
but governments should not be forcing slavery, as that to is a rob.


i dont think its right - but what do you think ?