do you feel sorry for Rebekah Brooks ?
 

don't whinge at the charge ginge 16.5.12

yes we got a charge,
take that,make it large.
i don't give a d---a----m,
put that on your front page, slam.
with not one bit of shame,
"they think its all over", now is this game.
its all going to go in this raffle,
i don't believe you when you say the headlines do "baffle".
you are corrupt and not desirable,
am i worried about my poem, sue me for liable.
being papped, and i bet you wish you were shorter,
was it sour if you recognised the reporter.
3 counts hang over your red fire,
i want you discredited as a compulsive liar.
more and more, i just love the sauce,
apart from David C,who else has had the horse.
front pages and inside, is this paper tough,
you don't look your best,infarct extremely rough.
this is not a slide show, or a which hunt,
you have to be held for account, you ginger c---??--------t. (guess the 4 letter word?)


sorry if this is a bit on the naughty side - i woke up thinking about sandy from emmerdale - think about it ?:xyxwave:

No,I don't really feel sorry for her, over her watch a lot of good likely hard working people lost their jobs at the News of the World, it would seem there is a massive epidemic of selective amnesia with all News International hierarchy and she is no exception to that either.

My own view is the whole company is suspect and it's good that so much has been unearthed as to its likely wrongdoings.

Having said that, while Rebekah is not someone I would admire at all and even less so now, I do fear it looks very hard that she in fact could get a really fair trial with so much publicity surrounding this scandal.
This is going to run for at least another year or so, many others may be pulled into it,senior Politicians could even fall because of it.

She for her part, has a lot to answer for but the way things have been reported on etc; one thing was correctly said yesterday, a fair,unbiased trial would seem hard to expect after so much publicity on this,so on that issue she does have some sympathy from me.
Not very much sympathy at all though.

Rupert Murdoch is the biggest threat to Western democracy. It'll be a great day when he finally kicks the bucket. He and his decades of evil doing will go with him. His ten billion kids will all demand a stake in his companies and then sell them off to the highest bidder for more money. Good riddance! I can't believe it took 80 years to finally make him pay.

I voted yes as i feel she will take the brunt of whatever is going on with that corrupt society,all those named seem suspect not just her and she will not get a fair trial and they really need to be seen to have 'nailed' someone.

Good lord no.

She should be shaved then tarred and feathered before being ducked and branded ..... :pipe:

Christ no.

I don't feel at all sorry for her at all. There is obviously a case to answer or she would never have been charged. The fact that it's been done so publically smacks of schadenfreude. After all, her "newspaper" set itself up as judge and jury so many tiems, now the press generally is doing it to her. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Again amazing solid points, especially the last part. near impossible to argue against that point.

**** no.

Apparently she's prepared to :

ITN Reporter

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2012-...nd-the-police/

Personally, I think the sword is too good for her - the skewer and the spit would be more appropriate, but I'd settle for the pillory and the wrath of the mob ..... :pipe:

no no
no no no no
no no no no
no no no theres no limit

No she can take it.


More to follow.


No Big Deal.

Nope. Not one bit.

What's good for the goose, is good for the gander.

I don't have sympathy for her.

She didn't care for laws and seemed to think because of her friends that she was above them.