TBH, I think EVERY Subway should do this..
 

No because you'd get loads of twats pretending to be homeless

It's probably just a joke

No, because that would just be stupid. Not that many would be paying. At least you could bank on the scallies and chavs working their way around it.

this

such positive responses

:nono:

I believe it's true. It's not that idealistic. It wouldn't cost them too much and I imagine the store manager's discretion was used to tell who was homeless.

Exactly

Karl, Nathan and Redway, go ****ing die you horrible *****

I'd pretend to be homeless for a free Mcdonald's lol.

:idc:

It depends on how much stock they have left

Thats America
they are worse of than us.

http://www.undeniabletv.net/home/sim...-humanity.html

Such a lovely idea, Subway :love:

Its One Branch one owner in america
Only.

I figured but its still a nice idea. And Subway is so good I wish my town had 1.

Subway can not afford to do this
so he will be Fired.


Example
http://jonathanturley.org/2010/06/12...partment-fire/

Maybe the manager pays for them?
Cant imagine too many turning up.

Every Subway is not the same
as its each owner is running their own profits.


Some will not be a as good as others.

Yes but Subway Corp
can noy afford that image.


They will still Sack him.

Even though many will say
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002579105

Helping the homeless is a bad image?

In America
they know who is Homeless in each area.


No one else would.

For the Company Image
they do not want it up front.
It could Bankrupt them

Like Over here
some M&S Foods gives Foods same day date to homeless groups
at the end of the day.

Kept at the back door