BB lets slip the difference between how they dealt with Caroline and Conor
 

Yesterday I told you about the jackonary story that a Channel 5 spokesman has been telling to the press.That BB in quotes "had given Conor a warning".

We know this not to be true.He was only made aware.

When they dealt with Caroline's abusive remark that Adam "was like a gorilla, with bad hair and poor sanitation" BB began with the are you aware s**T which isn't a warning, and I thought we were gonna get the same s**T that they'd say that was them warning a housemate.

But thankfully they did then issue her a formal warning, and said any more behaviour45 of this kind and BB will have to consider removing you from the house.

A whole lot different to whatg they did with Conor.

Yes, it's good that they did give her a formal warning, but the oh so clever (they think they are) BB management have let something slip there.

Because they have shown clearly that they only made sure Conor was aware (IE they didn't give him a real warning hereby making it clear the Channel 5 spokesman has lied to the press)

whereas they have also shown that they do it far more differently when they do actually give someone a warning.

I highlighted to the press the difference between what the Channel 5 spokesman had told them and what the diary room evidence of Conor showed us.I think I probably should tell them ab out the huge difference in what BB do as shown in the videos of Caroline and Conor when they do ac tually give a true warning.

That really annoyed me, of course Caroline's comments were ignorant and she does need to put that brain to work before opening her disgusting mouth but Connor's rant was even worse, he was talking about sexually and physically abuse of Deana and it doesn't even matter if he made it as a banter, joke or out of anger, he did say those nasty sentences and that alone not only deserved a warning but instant evicition.

That Scottish man does all the warnings when you hear his voice you know its serious.

I do think Conor should have had a formal warning too based on what Caroline said about Adam, and her getting one.

Big brother makes the rules though I guess and nothing we say will change that.

bump

Could bb give him a warning now or is it too late?

I thought it was ridiculous, double standards.

Well on what i've heard, if she meant it racist it's still not as offensive as what Conor said as he was making two threats on one Housemate, then don't forget he should've had a warning for his threat of violence against Benedict at the Wrap Party.

BB clearly are showing who there favourites are this year more than i've ever seen before.

really seems like it. also seemed like the so called "cool kids" got the easier of the task options this week mostly.

Both were awful but Conor is worse:

- ambiguity in whether Caroline meant it as a race slur.
- Conor's rant could have lead him to carry out his actions.
Carolines insult did not mean shed harm Adam
- Although I suspect Caz knew full well 'gorilla' was offensive,
giving her benefit of doubt she was ignorant. Conor knew his
rant was wrong as he even said 'I dont care if i get called to DR'
- Conors rant could have resulted in a crime being committed, police
arrest etc

Their sensitive spot is racism, that's it.

The fact Adam's black and he was called a Gorilla - and they bounced on it straight away and gave her a FORMAL WARNING where as Conor didn't get one, says it all.

Yes your right,It does say it all, it says what Conor did was not racist and not as bad as what Caroline did :idc:

pathetic

I tried to highlight that point yesterday.

The Conor apologists spin it that way too, that Conor was given a warning, along with the 'he said sorry to Deana' bollocks.

Conor was told off. That was it.

The task was pathetic. Particularly hard on certain housemates in one group.

They cut up the cigarettes and have spent over £100 on protein powder.
Very unfair.