Danica should sue for slander!
 

I was appalled on BOTTS tonight when that mother called Danica a "*****" following her psycho daughter's command! What right has Jasmine and her mother got calling the girl that? Frankly I wouldn't blame Danica if she sued Jasmine, her mother and BB for slander when she gets out as nobody should have to put up with that whether in the BBH or not! And I'm not even a fan of Danica but am appalled at what she's been put through all in the name of "entertainment".

I agree, thats the worst thing I have ever seen on BB! They actually facilitated that, just to upset Danica, and allow that horrible to have another go.

Truly, truly shameless.

I don't care for Danica but BB should have never had that set up where the Mother had to say all that Jasmine told her to.
That blame lies with BB completely,as for Jasmine's Mother, well all I can say is I am glad she isn't mine.

I still cannot for the life of me see any point at all in putting this in place and having Jasmine's Mother in the house at all.

To win a case in court for suing someone for telling the truth is generally regarded as a daft idea. She is a ***** so no big deal.

It's the truth so I don't know how she can prosecute against that :conf:

What she is and what she does to be fair is a matter for her, to allow her to be ridiculed further and by a 3rd party too as a 'task' on a public show is at the very least completely unacceptable.

BB should have not allowed such a free run on this,I actually think a court would come down on the side of Danica on this one.
It will never get to that point and Danica will not try to sue but I cannot see any valid reason for this task being set up in the first place except for to rub more salt into the wounds as to this comment now made twice as to Danica, by Jasmine and a member of her family now too.

I totally agree with you. I think this has gone way too far and by giving that poisonous woman Jasmine a vehicle to vent further her hatred for Danica BB have crossed the line. I wonder whether this might end up being taken to the "Watchdog" if it is then I believe BB will come out bad.

Only a virgin/ gold star lesbian would be able to sue for being called a ***** as soon as a eoman has sex with a bloke she is liable to be seen as a sl*t, h* ,wh*re , sl*g etc.

I totally agree with you, after all it is only a few days since the public clearly fed up of Jasmine and her caustic tongue,refused to vote for her enough to keep her in the house at all.

That means the public wanted no more of her, this bringing her and her rather misguided,(to be as polite as I can be), Mother back, is not only an insult to the viewers generally but especially to the people who spent their money on voting to save others to get rid of Jasmine and believed they had seen the back of her once and for all.

'I'm going to prosecute because a bitchy girl said something mean :('
Errm this is not russia we do have freedom of speech(to a extent :laugh:).

Calling someone a "*****" on national TV is hardly something to be brushed off as "something mean"? Jasmine and her mother damaged Danica's reputation tonight and I think that's a disgrace. Danica, as far as I'm aware, does not sell her body for money and thus can hardly be called a "*****".

We do have free speech but in public some terms, no matter whether there is truth in them or not, are not acceptable to be made there and BB is a public show after all.

It is not the first instance of Jasmine saying this to Danica when she was in the house herself that is the main bone of contention on this, it is the follow up after Jasmine being evicted and BB allowing Jasmine to have the attack made again on Danica which is in my view,wholly unacceptable.
BB should have laid firm ground rules as to what could be said as part of this task.

Of course, as far as I am concerned,BB should have never had any further involvement at all by Jasmine on BB after her eviction.
That was another wrong thing to do and allow to happen.

Lots of girls have been called sluts and hoes on reality tv its nothing new get over it. If we are going to blame jasmine's comment on the reason why Danica has a bad reputation and prosecute her for it, them we should sue TXF judges for saying someone is a bad singer or arrest high school girls for spreading rumours about each other oh and wile were at it lets take down the teachers for giving students a bad report. What Jasmine said was just a petty bitchy comment nothing more nothing less.

Thing is it is relatively true..

Danika damaged her own reputation for flashing her sloppy bits for a bit of cash as well as parading herself on babestation

Especially galling when you consider how Jasmine has made a name for herself and become famous. The hypocrisy is simply staggering...

You can't sue someone for slander for a compliment.

What she does is worse than being a *****.

find Danica's online wishlist distasteful. But that is my opinion. I have ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER to expect her to conform to my moral code. The only 'code' that she should be forced to live by, is that laid out by the law. Danica does not break the law. Why must people make 'moral' judgements? Why must people give her such a disgusting label?

In all other aspects, I find her charming, good hulmoured, funny, pleasant, articulate and intelligent. Unfortunately for her, I think lots of men may not let their gaurd down around her. However, in time I think she's more than bright enough to figure out her own way in life. From what I've seen, I'd be very surprised if she was content to maintain her current lifestyle for too much longer. I hope she abandons the 'wishlist' idea. But, I'll certainly not make any jusdgemnets id she doesn't.

But I will make jusgements about what people have said about, and to, her. Nobody has the right to be deliberately offensive, to someone wwho has been entirely inoffensive. Danica has never so much as raised her voice to another housemate. She has never been anything other than pleasant. And yet they all rush to judge her morality! And then one or two, actually call her the most disgusting name they can come up with. What exactly is she supposed to have done to deserve this abuse? It is quite simply wrong. Anybody who doesn't see it as such, is of ver different caharcater to me.

There are at least two men in the house who are relatively famous for trading on their reputations for having many relationships. Danica is not famous for her relationships - however, she is portrayed as fallen woman. This is hypocrisy.

She has been polite and pleasant to everyone and has tried to make friends. It is difficult enough in the house as it is - so friendships will help anyone get through this rather bizarre ordeal and part of the enjoyment of watching is the way friendships are formed - sometimes between the unlikeliest people.

Danica was right when she said this was a personal attack. It was.

If the morality of this situation is to be judged then C5 were morally wrong to conjure up such a cheap, cringeworthy stunt. Jasmine's mother (apparently famous for naming her children after her husband's mistresses) was extremely unwise to take part in this charade - and has made herself look extremely foolish.

I expect Danica will have had to sign a legal document saying she will not sue any of the participants, nevertheless it is both unjust and unfair for her to have to endure this level of relentless bullying and sanctimonious attitudes.

If this had been happening to Cheryl there would have been a public outcry. Instead it is happening to a very pretty woman - there is no crime in looking nice.

There are some strange turkeys that follow BB if anybody honestly thinks there is a legal case here they need to wise up but i suspect its just a couple of people being daft trying to wind people up.
If they are being serious then just LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL wtf are you honestly nieve enough to think that they walk into that house with just a promise of free cash without signing contracts omg really! ;)

Many scumsuckers have being desperate enough to say it in the house none have been advised to do it after they leave.

Anybody "apalled" turn it off its so simple.

Provided what you say about a person can be proved to be the truth there is no legal premise on which you can be sued. Unfortunately for Danica there's plenty of proof, and that's just a fact not a judgement.

What I find worse is allowing that bitter, jealous, hypocritical psycho a platform to spout her venom.

Agreed. Moral crusaders are nauseating.

Great post :thumbs:

Why? Some might even say she performs a valuable service, keeping the sleazy voyeurs who tune in safely off the streets and w*nking at home. Where there's a demand, there'll be someone supplying, so don't let's pretend that the clients who keep her in business are somehow her innocent victims.