Mark Duggan: Man Guilty Of Supplying Gun
 

A man has been found guilty of supplying a gun to Mark Duggan, whose fatal shooting by police soon after sparked riots in London.

Kevin Hutchinson-Foster was convicted at the Old Bailey of passing the gun to Mr Duggan after a retrial.

A jury previously failed to reach a verdict at Snaresbrook Crown Court.

http://news.sky.com/story/1192172/du...awfully-killed

Duggan Verdict: 'Unarmed But Lawfully Killed'


The Family may be angry
but Mark was not a good person
he got that Gun to shoot at a robbery or something

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-522x293.jpg

He threw the gun didn't he?
Don't play with guns kids, you might get shot.

Mark's only criminal record was for weed possession and public disturbance. What a terrifying criminal. Even the whole "he threw away a gun" myth has never been backed up by multiples eye witnesses.

Killing an unarmed man is lawful now. **** outta here. A black guy's life means not a god damn thing and I don't give a **** how militant I sound it's the damn truth. Look at the way Raoul Moat was handled and look at this. I feel sick. Absolutely sick. No problem sentencing rioters to 10 years or so In Jail, but an execution is swept under the carpet. I swear I'm way too furious. I'm off to relax.

God bless Mark and his family. Tottenham will always support you and won't give up on Justice.

Yes he threw the Gun
But 8 out 10 of the
jury members said he was Shot under the Law.



I hope Ch4News does not spend to long on this.

lawful lololololol

I agree with Leon

But he Just Had a Gun and threw it
He was not a Good person.

OMFG at Sky News right now they're screaming down at the policeman

Woow

Cant hear a word hes saying.

They've never verified whether that's true or not as far as I'm aware

Yes that mother is a Trouble maker

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-522x293.jpg



yes well Zee
you ain't on the Jury

Already getting that feeling there will be some kind of protests/riots going on after this

Yes
many wait for this and
use it as a reason to rob stores


Punks

I could

Jean Charles de Menezes was shot dead on 22nd July 2005 for running onto a train. He was unarmed and had committed no crime whatsoever.

Yet he had seven bullets pumped into his head at point blank range.

So it does not surprise me that the police decided to execute Mr Duggan. Once they saw he had a gun he was effectively a deadman regardless what he was trying to do with the gun ie surrender .

The Police now follow their counterparts in the states and shoot first and ask questions afterwards.

Some people dispute that he even had a gun and many eye-witnesses that day say the Police just forced the car to stop and went over and fired upon Mr Duggan.

We may turn a blind eye to this but what happens when you are the one being fired at by armed police because you are carrying a table leg or a walking stick.....!!!!

Yes at the Time of London Bombing, just after
I was not shocked how the MI5 shot him
so much - as they thought he had a bomb on him.

If you have a gun in London
you are a Death Wish.


M.D. ditched his gun
but the police did not know if he was still armed

And neither are you, arista.

So surrounding him and asking him to put his hands in the air and then ly face down in the road with his hands still outstretched was too difficult for them to do...

They decided since he had a gun he must now die....

Judge, Jury and Executioner all rolled into one.....!!!!

It was in a tube station
He could have been Armed with a Bomb
so they made sure fast he could not hit a switch.
7/7 had just gone down

I would expect this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_...ondon_bombings

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Charles_de_Menezes

Where was he hiding the Bomb then.....because when you look back on that day and look at the evidence and speak with the other eyewitnesses he only had on a t- shirt and clearly could not have had explosives strapped to him ??

Sure Zee
but I back the legal way.


Not a criminal way
like you do.

I haven't indicated my support for either side of the verdict, actually. All I said was they didn't conclusively prove whether he actually had a gun or not, to my knowledge. :facepalm: