Anger after Queen was 'mobbed by mobile' during BBC visit while staff 'followed her a
 

Anger after Queen was 'mobbed by mobile' during BBC visit while staff 'followed her around like zombies'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2ViNVkevg


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/...45_634x416.jpg
Fecking Zombie BBC Staff all holing up Mobiles to get their
own Film of it.


What a Feck Up

What is the mindless obsession with recording everything on Smart phones. This is the Queen not some B list celeb. Show some restraint and respect.

It it was dreadful ITV1 you wouldn't be complaining

Yes BBC News Boss is a Zombie

How horrific, this is literally the worst thing that has ever happened in the world ever.

ha ha I know but she is on a busy schedule, Philip is in hospital, they really could have backed off, she was being recorded by the BBC after all:joker:

I was getting live updates of this from some of the weather presenters and Radio 1 DJ's I follow on Twitter :joker:

But anyway...who gives a ****, it was ten minutes out of their day...big deal

Yes Bloated BBC Zombie's
following her with Mobile Phone Cameras


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/...10_634x318.jpg

Nice photobomb, Liz :joker:

Yes I hear you
Wise Vicky

What's the problem? The royals are just Britain's Kardashians anyway.

Every Staff member Standing with their own Private Phone
following her like fecking Zombies


BBC has to get better than that



BBCAmerica is great
as it Funds itself

Arista..I have always wondered this..do you pay your TV license?

Just the burning hate you have for the BBC would say no..

Yes I do
and in this Day and Age it Stinks

They sell billions of BBC DVDs and other products

Enough to fund its Fecking Self

I fund the BBC every time i have to watch ads on the BBC website. I probably provide more money to the BBC by having to watch ads as an American on the BBC website than the actual British license payers bring in.

Havent paid mine for years and years. I disagree with it really. I would pay if it was JUST for the upkeep of satellites and stuff (which would be a lot cheaper) but since part of it goes to the BBC I dont watch BBC..and even if I did I dont see why they dont just use adverts to fund themselves the same as other channels do. I dont see why we should be taxed on top of the price of buying the tv/sky/etc

Tbh I very rarely watch TV anyway, use catchups and download torrents much more often.

It's especially ridiculous, because sometimes i'll be on the BBC website, and try to watch a video, and sit through the 30 second ad, and then it says "sorry this is not available in your region" !!!

So they got my advertising count by making me watch the 30 second ad and then i don't even get to watch the video. If it's not available in my region, tell me that BEFORE you show me the ad. They are bastards.

Ahh the big brother site used to do something like that to me a lot. Make me watch loads of ads, then cut out so I had to refresh and watch the ads again. Im sure it was on purpose.

Thats due to change soon

More ads
but you should be able to watch all.

welcome to the future precious lol

Yes, God forbid that you'd be funding one of the more impartial, and higher quality television networks out there. :rolleyes:

State funded TV is not impartial. It's a conflict of interest. You can't claim to be impartial if you are receiving money from the government.

When it's Iran state funded TV, biased, China state funded TV, biased, but we are meant to believe that UK state funded TV isn't biased?

give me a break. :bored:

You cannot claim to be independent and unbiased when you are receiving money from the government.