Family ordered off easyJet flight because daughter had small cut
 

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/...19_634x514.jpg

They should have covered it up with a plaster.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/...77_634x732.jpg
[Fed up: Pregnant Laura Bishop and
19-month-old daughter Robyn were kicked
off a flight back home from Jersey because
of a small cut on Robyn's face - incurring £600
in extra hotel bills for the family]

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2WrcxES28

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/...47_634x432.jpg
today the mark is fading




Life In The Fast Lane

That's not really that small a cut though

ohhhhhhh shoot

No looks bad
So cover it up with a Plaster


Is all they needed to do

Then the staff would just have asked what was under the plaster?

Plus the mother stated in the article it's just her skin not her eye when you can clearly see in the first photo the childs eye has been affected a bit, it looks slightly closed over because of the swelling or something..

The parents are being over dramatic going to the papers for that IMO.

Just say a Graze
its not like a hidden bomb


And as to going to papers
it cost her a extra £600, so i can understand that.



Next Time Take Plasters
at all times



And The Pilot thinks he is a Doctor:


['The pilot said that the eye being a
delicate area - he couldn’t tell if it would get
worse during the flight.
'He had to think about all the other
passengers’ safety. I kept saying it’s not her eye,
it is her skin below her eye.]

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2WrrdvWOc

that would have bled loads. this is a pointless article, the staff did the right thing.

Not with a Strong Plaster On