Please sack willougby!
 

she is useless , she interrupts everything, she adds nothing, she knows nothing about music, shes vastly vastly over paid and she just takes all the magic out of the show..she talks over singers, asks them dumb questions, like ,can you believe youre here etc ...she talks over judges too and wastes crucia air time....I really don't like her rather vapid cold personality and her banal clichés read off autocue....reggie was fine.....the voice doesn't need this overhyped presenter....and before any 17 year old males respond with but shes got nice boobs, I don't care this is a music show, you want boobs try babestation.....get rid

But she's got a lovely set of fun bags

The Truth,I agree, she really annoyed me on the Voice this series, her ridicluous screaming as she was introducing the acts and after they finished was really awful.

She gets mixed up, all she is,is the kind of person that says look at me,aren't I beautiful.

I don't even like her on This Morning when I watch it, when they are dealing with something she clearly doesn't like we get a sort of pet lip,child sulk look.
Pleased to say I agree with you,she is awful.

I love Holly :love:

fair enough....ps why? what does she actually know of music? what does she add to this show? do you think shes worth thousands of pounds per minute of tax payers money? really?

she's nice but she has literally no personality.

or knowledge or musical experience or intelligence or even the good manners to shut up , listen and let others talk

I don't think she needs to know anything about music to be the presenter, her job is introducing the acts etc For me the presenter just needs to be likeable and good at their job which i believe Holly is

She should be removed from TV full stop.

Over-rated doesn't cut it, only person who comes close is Keith bastard Lemon.
Both vile cretins

I disagree entirely. She uses up more air time than anyone else on the show with her wooden reading from the auto cue for £28,000 an episode? for that enormous money (tax payers money in a triple dip recession) we should get someone with some knowledge, some basic understanding of when to shut up and listen and not talk over infinitely more experienced more knowledgeable people.

but then again she married the tv producer so clearly she will be favoured

Ok well we could sit here arguing about it all day but it's not going to make me like her less or you like her more

sad you've ignored my last points

Holly's the tip of the iceberg so sacking her wont save this awful show.

Well, I'm not British so it's not my tax money and I don't really care who she's married to, I still like her as a presenter :conf:

it is an obscene amount of money to pay someone on TV,surely doctors,nurses etc,deserve a cut of that,She is ok but not a brilliant presenter imo.

:worship:

whats british got to do with it? her husband she met in 2004 on a tv show and this soon got the shows titled changed to include her name....is she worth £28.000 tax payers money, for the few minutes she reads mindless drivel off the autocue? why allow her this airtime to interrupt and talk over singers and judges.....on occasions she takes so much air time for this drivel, some judges don't even get a chance to critique? please tell me what brilliant witticism or insight or critique of hers can you recall and tell us about? pls convince us she is worth £5000 a sentence?

Well, you specifically asked me to answer your points, one of which was : for that enormous money (tax payers money in a triple dip recession) we should get someone with some knowledge, some basic understanding of when to shut up and listen and not talk over infinitely more experienced more knowledgeable people. As I'm not British, it isn't my tax money that's paying her wages...........

Also, I don't have to convince you of anything, she's a presenter who I like, I couldn't give a flying **** whether you do or not lol

I love Holly, i've always found her genuinely sweet, and likeable when presenting. She is definitely much better when she is on This Morning though

I like Holly and wouldn't mind if she was on next year, but it's true she is there for her name and not due to her presenting prowess. I don;t go along with her lacking a personality, on Celeb Juice she is pretty funny. Not laugh out loud funny, but amusing nonetheless!

Fearne Cotton would be good at it, although i doubt she'd take a job that her mate had previously been given the boot from.

so you cant justify a word of what youre saying and when asked you respond by swearing like apetulant child....all Im aksing is why you think shes a great presenter for the voice and how you think her salary is justified. you don't have to answer, Im wondering now if you even have an answer?

Why do I need to justify the fact that I like her as a presenter?

I'm sorry, I may be wrong but you seem to be under the delusion that this show is about music? :laugh2:

And name me one TV star who isn't "vastly overpaid", that's the industry. None of them actually deserve the megabucks they get even if they're talented at what they do.

But, hey, life's a bitch.

not only is she dull as dishwater, she adds nothing, she just takes away and is rude enough to talk over everyone and steal air time. oh and shes getting £28k an episode which is 15 episodes totals £420,000 tax payers money for reading a few meaningless lines off an autocue?

This "talk over everyone" is this to get them to hurry the hell up and say something, make a vote because she's got a producer screaming in her ear that they're running out of time?
Perhaps.