What if they used vote to save and vote to evict? *read description*
 

What if they have two options to Vote like if they get a vte it counts as 1 vote but if someone vts one vote gets knocked of?

This will give people a chance to vote for there favourite and least? Plus would mean more people will vote? ( people voting twice)

Thoughts?

They did it on Aussie bb .

Personally I think they should of just left it as vote to save.
That's how it is all around the world, and that's what works best.
Some bright spark at C5 obviously thought it would be a good idea to go back to the ghastly channel 4 way.

This would be the fairest way definitely.

Didn't stop the good housemates from being evicted on BB AU, wouldn't stop it now.

Don't think that would work as well as VTS.

Would only have any relevance in a double+ eviction. Utterly pointless in a heads up. And when 3+ housemates are up for a single eviction, casting a vote to evict one and another to save one is the same thing as casting two votes to evict the first person or casting two votes to save the second person.

For this to make any difference, they would have to make it vote to save until Wednesday where the housemate would the most votes would be saved and then vote to evict until friday.

VTS was always way overrated!
All the best series' of BB were Vote to Evict and that's the way it should be.

They are already kinda doing a vote to save and vote to evict system now with the safe house.

Only thing they are ****ing up on is picking the pairs themselves rather than having HMs separate. They would probably make more money from them being separate too

Yeh they did it on the Australian one but it was mainly vote to evict that ended up dominant. That's why it was better when they switched to vote to save, while keeping their minimum of 3 up.

There have been very few complete vote to save series and those have been on the tired and cheaper version on CH5 anyway, so the comparison is pointless.