Unemloyed Woman 6 kids demands big house
 

She was on DaybreakITV1HD


All 6 kids are in a small home.



On TV when the reporter
asked why have 6 kids?

She smiled and claimed the Pill failed etc.



I am sorry but they are Husband and Wife
using 6 kids to claim money.


they are meant to be in the 13 years of New Labour Time

Well she is likely to get one, since some person living alone in a 3 bedroomed house who has done nothing worng and accepted a secure tenancy,who has likely spent a lot on the garden of the house and keeps the house in good order internally,is being in effect financially blackmailed out of that house by this Govts bedroom tax/charge.

Which is likely then to be handed to this lady while she or he who was living alone gets forced to move into a 1 bedroomed flat.
Clearly being in this situation will pay off then for this lady thanks to this Govts policies.

No.


Thats why she went on Live TV.


Joey this case is Not what you think
its outright kids for Benefits (New Labour 13 years time)

6 kids thats big money.
they are not workers



I wish you watched her.
Young Husband in the background (not wanting to work) - And saying nothing

..is it this one Arista..?..

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ne...-29427587.html

If it is that one..then you can hardly blame her for popping out kids if the docs say shes incredibly fertile and they have tried methods of contraception. Also the latest kids were twins, which would back up the doctors theory too. And I don't think its unreasonable to ask for a bigger house when there are 8 of them living in a 1 bedroomed apartment. And its hardly that the bloke doesn't want to work..he's looking after the children as the woman is currently ill...

I hope its a different family that arista was talking about, as otherwise it appears everything has been twisted in this thread.

Short of being celibate for the rest of her life or her/partner getting the snip..theres not much that can be done here surely?

Who are we demonising today?.... :idc:

..yeah, I don't know if it's the same one Vicky..I just tried googling it to get more of the story and this is what came up..probably not the same one though..

Have they tried all contraception? Has he had the snip? If she's very fertile then she's surely gonna have more kids so should the state pay for all the kids or should it pay for him to have the snip?

Its a 6 kids young mother and lazy Dad


Live report from their home
this morning on ITV1HD Daybreak

She suffers from depression so she needs him at home to look after her & the kids.
She says she is very fertile so cant help getting pregnant, have they not heard of the snip :conf:

Why should either of them have to be medically mutilated? If she's incredibly fertile, she's incredibly fertile, unless they want to do something about that then there's no onus on either of them to have anything snipped or tied.

The children should be in charge of the money, they're probably more responsible than the two adults anyway.

A better solution would be for her to get treated for depression, so that one of them can work. However she may already be getting treatment.

Its hardly right to expect people to go through operations simply because they are poor. In my opinion anyway.

Anyway, the benefit cap means even if they do have more kids they wont get anymore money. However since its medical..I'm quite sure that if neither gets an op they will still have more kids. What will the excuse be then? As it cant be because they want more money :wink:

Oh. Well having not seen daybreak, I can't comment on the woman you are on about in that case. As I have a feeling that this may not be the full story. If it is though, shame on them having kids just for money..

But this benefit cap will stop this. Even though I dont think its as common as some people believe. I think come 10 years time, we will still have poor families with loads of kids, because it was never all about the money.

http://metro.co.uk/2013/07/16/couple...ldren-3885784/

I think this is them
but they are older than this Photo

http://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/...p=1#038;h=1000


[The couple, who claim more than £26,000 in benefits each year,
said they had tried a range of contraception but Mrs Flisher, 26, is ‘super fertile’.]

That seems to be the same couple from the link Ammie posted.

And they cant claim over 26k a year as 26k is the most you can claim per household. And usually the majority of that goes on housing benefit.

the Council says they have claimed over 26K
and they are not getting a bigger home


Yes ammi went to belfast to get the link
Tricking me

The kids look lovely , the parents on the other hand.

Yes Sad
they are not aware of the mothers scam



On daybreak she was smilling about all the times she had a baby

Well tbh I find this ridiculous. Expecting 8 people to live in a one bedroomed place. I thought the whole point of the bedroom 'tax' was to free up the larger properties for larger families?

all parents want what best for there kids you would do the same but you have no kids right????????????????????????

Do you expect her to scowl in resentment at the memories of having her children?

No but it looked like she was not telling the truth.

when or if you ever have kids then you can talk till then you dont no what it like vicky does :hmph:

I call bull**** on the ‘super fertile’ part of that, and even is she is, he could get the snip, and sorry but the parents look like they'd fit in perfectly on Jeremy kyle :joker: