I honestly don't get why people want Sam to win
 

Yes, he is nice. Yes, I like him. But he hasn't done anything much to warrant being voted the winner. Imagine if we had a season of people that were just like him, it would be dull and people would moan to hell, so I don't get why people are backing him as a winner this time? This is BB, an entertainment show and a gameshow, not be as nice as you can and cruise though 10 weeks of TV to be given money for doing so.

It worked for Rachel Rice and Cameron in BB4.

I agree though, he isn't a worthy winner but if people vote for him he could easily win

Agreed. Sam makes even Cameron and Rachel Rice interesting. :joker::joker:

I want Sam to win:devil:

Rachel Rice was always interesting.

I don't actively want Sam to win, but I wouldn't mind it. He'd still be better than about half the godawful winners we've had. I'll settle with anything as long as Jack and Joe don't win.

sympathy vote

I keep asking Sam supporters this and they either never answer the question or give sarcy answers.

I would love to hear genuine reason as to why he should win.

:joker::joker::joker: Ya could have give me a skirt to wear:shocked:

Because he sleeps the most? :laugh:

but why?
what reasons do you want him to win?

Why would he be better than past winners? we have had some terrible winners, but what stands Sam out as a better winner to them?

For me he would be the worst of all the past winners, even worse than Rachel Rice and Anthony Hutton, and they are tough acts to follow.

Nor is it be as horrible as you can and cruise through 10 weeks of TV to be given money for doing so.

They are all reprobates and wannabes. Rewarding anyone for being so does not sit well with me.

Sam has conquered and is dealing with difficulty every single day, the the others and loads of this forum could not even dream of. He is a nice young lad who would put the money to good use.

He has my respect. I don't really give a toss who wins. But if I had to choose, it would be him.

He's the most boring non-entity ever to have got this far, even worse than Rachel and Cameron. They were boring but at least they had their own personalities. Sam is a frigging bore lord who is blander than bland. If he wins I'm gonna kick a puppy.

He'd be better because this show has a ****ing horrible track record for winners and half of them are repulsive in one way or another. Sam being completely inoffensive makes him one of the better winners by default.

Anthony was my favourite that year, but i couldn't stand fence sitter Rachel. Rex was robbed that year.
Sam would be the most pointless winner ever.

So true, they actually engaged in conversation with other housemates.. i don't think i have ever seen Sam start a conversation with anyone bar Callum, he doesn't even try either

I noticed that. He doesn't seem interested in talking to anyone in there. :suspect:

How do you know he's nice? He never says or does anything. He could be sat there thinking of the different ways he's going to stalk and murder them all for all we know.

I didn't say he was nice though?

This is very true Sam started off well until he paired up with Callum, I think big brother should give him a task to get to know everyone better. He's young and deserves a second chance :)

I like Sam, great lad so far.
Best reason of all I can give for him winning is.... Dexter won't:joker::joker::joker:

he probably is , callum has groomed him well lol

That's as good a reason as any smudgie:joker:

I agree. Callum has isolated Sam. He's not close to anyone now.