Is it fair that Gina has had the biased BBBOTS and such a good edit compared 2 others
 

I used to prefer BBBOTS to the main show, because it was funny, and a light relief compared to the main show waiting for the nasties to be put in their place which is the only real entertainment most viewers get from the main show I think and is very frustrating waiting for the nasties each year to be put in their place.I used to love Jamie East who was easily the funniest for me on BBBOTS and am dissapointed they got rid of him, maybe because he would be too outspoken and he maybe would have said the truth about Gina on BBBOTS when none of the others have dared, apart from one short comment by the psych last night saying she'd noticed Gina was manipulating and taking glee but made out she was innocent about it BS.

But I've been sick at how every other housemate gets accused of things on BBBOTS yet no one ever mentions when Gina has been behind anything, they really should have called it the Gina ars* licking show this year or something like that.

Is it really fair if she was to win given that she has had such biased propaganda behind her almost all series on BBBOTS and that all the other housemates have had shi* that they have said about others exposed to other hm's yet BB have kept Gina's nastiest remarks from the other hm's ?

Most people are Gina fans, most people don't want to say bad things about her..

Erm, BB have shown Gina's bad bits including and not limited to: Her argument with Jemima, her arguments with Sallie, her in the SH, her with Hazel, her stirring a little bit etc.

How is that good editing or being bias?

I agree....she and Dexter are getting good BBBOTS edits and Hazel is getting bad ones. Very unfair and I am loosing faith in Emma. She is becoming a puppet and its going to bite her one day.

Twins have had a much better edit than everyone combined.

What could be done to give Hazel a "good edit"?

If you need me to answer that you need help. She is a HM like all the others and deserves an impartial edit. Spin off shows report the news, they are not supposed to make it or twist it for effect.

This.

They don't hide Gina's worst bits.

It's Sam and the Twins that get the biased edit.

I see the Gina haters are choosing to ignore my post. Shocking. :idc:

This is true, even though I don't mind the twins. I certainly don't think Gina's edits have been that favourable, especially of late.

BOTS shows Ginas bad bits then Emma says something like - 'but that's why I like her' or 'but thats Gina being Gina' etc -ITs hardly subtle the way they're doing it. Then as soon as Hazel is mentioned the comments start, people are allowed to drag up sh*t that happened ages ago and Emma says nothing. No defence. Nothing. Its not the same for all parties.

You only need to watch some of the "Tonight" exerts to see some of the comments are taken completely out of context purely for effect.

BBBOTS has always been biased ,every year they do the same thing ,they speak in different tones for different housemates and the sheep in the audience hang on to every word and ooo and hhaaaaaa at the right moments

They could have shown the night in the safe house with Daley from the start,when he was losing it because she wouldn't come to bed,instead of making out that it all started with her demanding a cuddle?
They could have used their flashback system to show what Hazel actually said in her VT,and not allow Gina to maintain that she confessed to being The Omen incarnate??
And the other night,they could have shown Gina and Sophie winding Hazel up as regards to Charlie???
Three off the top of my head!!!:nono: