Sam would be yet another BB manufactured winner
 

He's just this years this whole farce of making this vile git out to be a nice person is just sickening especially with the amount stuff they have covered up to help him its getting harder tho his vile personality is coming out more and more sad its to late for the public to see the truth .

The Public prefer to believe the lies they have been told!

okay

:pat::conf2::shrug::idc::crazy:

It is particularly irritating that one knows the likes of Emma would abruptly cut off any discussion of the reality of the "sweet boy" (actually a rather yobbish, potty-mouthed 23yr old man).

I find it laughable that some refer to Sam as vile, yobbish etc but then completely over look the fact that certain other housemates have been feeding both the housemates and the public lies since day 1.

And thats what really annoys me the fact that due to his disability he people will over look all his bad traits.

Or the fact that people use his disability against him as the only reason why others like him.

Well if he werent deaf I guarantee he wouldnt have gotten away with a lot of his snidey under handed comments .

no hed be one of the few UNMANUFACTURED winners
hes the real deal joke machine

Sam, the man who ignored Dexter, who had come to speak to him after Callum's eviction, then walks into the DR and says "...if I want to talk to a...hole I will talk to the poo". Then has the bloody cheek to have a go at Dexter the following night when Dexter rightly stated the way he had behaved the previous night.

The lad is a bit of an hypocrite.

This is only true and interesting for the people who don't want him to win.

Honestly he would be the worst winner ever, and after Brian Belo I never thought I would say that. The guy has done NOTHING to warrant it and what we have seen has been vulgar and unpleasant.

How do you know that :conf:
You are just making assumptions that people only like Sam because he is deaf.

Well that's me convinced smeg, i have seen the light.

I shall now pour my support to the honest and respectable Dexter....




....right after that flying pig goes over the hill.

I love the fact a natural honest person is favourite, awesome

Or the edits BB permits them to see.

I have to agree with this thread. Even Sam admits the public might not like him because he is crude. He has definately been edited.

Again Ive liked Sam from the beginning, from what BB show of him he does appear to be a harmless felliw. And when he did stand up to Dexter I did find it electric he handled himself well and I dislike Dex referring (infact most of the HM's have) as a boy. Maybe they are seeing a jovial side to him that we are not. But I can well believe what they have written in the papers about Dexter, Gina and Sam. This concerns me because Dexter has been pretty open about his back story in the house, and Gina comes across as far from moral. But everyone here is liking Sam because they believe his moral and honest and stands up to Dexter, but then what if like the other two whats written in the paper is true. what if he does abuse people in the pub as stated act arrogant and hit people with pool cues treating the staff badly. What if he wins he scoops the money and this all turns out to be true. If Dexter or Gina wins I wont feel cheated because I already know what there like, and theybe been the most entertaining they deserve to win. What if moral Sam aint so moral, then he wins the show which he does not rightly deserve on entertsinment value alone. And who will they blame BB or their poor judgement and gullibility.
The Star is the paper that runs for big brother.Does it tell the truth about Dexter and Gina but lies about Sam? Maybe, why? I dont know. If Sam wins I truly hope that the way BB has portrayed him isnt dishonest, however from little snippets especially when he is drinking my instinct tells me otherwise.

Right I understand there's not a lot of heterosexual males on here but this whole Sam being crude thing, trust me he's not that crude.

I work as a gardener and I've seen far more cruder things spoken by far older and presumably wiser people. Mostly it's just guy talk though.

But they are not on national tv repeatedly saying those things.

Neither is Sam...

Most are moaning that everything he says that's crude is cut out the highlights remember?....

Most of it is yes, and that raises the question as to why?

So if most of it is cut then he's not on national tv repeatedly saying crude things is he? so which is it?

Lots of things get cut out too so no it doesn't really raise any questions imo, maybe there was some arguing or a forced showmance that the producers just had to show during those times :shrug:

Sam is not a nice person, he's got a bag of spuds on his shoulder never mind a chip. But he's no worse than anybody left in there. They are all tosspots. The best thing that could happen would be if the ground opened up and swallowed them all whole.