ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Huawei To Build £125m Research Base In Britain (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=239146)

arista 16-10-2013 01:30 PM

Huawei To Build £125m Research Base In Britain
 
http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-522x293.jpg


http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-522x293.jpg




The announcement came on the fourth day
of the Chancellor's visit to China, during
which he spent the day at the company's
global headquarters in the
southern city of Shenzhen.
By visiting the sprawling campus-based
site with a delegation of small and
medium-sized British tech firms,
George Osborne gave a clear
endorsement of a controversial company.
The United States has banned Huawei
from selling everything except its mobile
handsets and broadband devices.



A Growing Company.



Sign Of The Times

zakman440 16-10-2013 02:46 PM

I have a Huawei phone. They're s***.

arista 16-10-2013 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zakman440 (Post 6433541)
I have a Huawei phone. They're s***.


Yes they a Cheap
they are growing as a Company hence
this R&D in England.

Samm 16-10-2013 04:17 PM

what is a Huawei

arista 16-10-2013 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamP (Post 6433659)
what is a Huawei


Cheaper mobiles at Argos & other stores

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget....1351109761.jpg


A Big Company in China


Cheaper LED TV's online selling


And Massive broadband underground
set ups.




And R&D

arista 13-09-2021 12:09 AM

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cp...8_times-nc.png


[BBC Text
The Times says the Chinese tech company Huawei,
which was banned from involvement in the UK's 5G infrastructure
over security concerns, has been
accused of "infiltrating" a Cambridge University research centre.
The paper says three out of four
directors at the Cambridge Centre
for Chinese Management,
part of the university's business school,
have links to the company.]

Saph 13-09-2021 12:33 AM

when I used to work at a phone shop years ago this would always be the type of phone we'd sell to old grannies because they were the only ones gullible enough to buy one

user104658 13-09-2021 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saph (Post 11093752)
when I used to work at a phone shop years ago this would always be the type of phone we'd sell to old grannies because they were the only ones gullible enough to buy one

P20's and P30's were actually great phones, clean and very responsive, good screens, decent build quality, no slowdown over time (I'm looking at you, Samsung). I loved my P20 Pro :joker:. Though to be fair, in the end the battery puffed up so badly it cracked open the back case :umm2:. Apparently that's something that can randomly happen to the Li-ion batteries in any phone though, who knew.

Obviously Huawei's beyond the P30 generation became useless because Google stopped allowing them to use Google Services (including Play Store) so really they're useless outside of China.

user104658 13-09-2021 08:21 AM

I'm pretty sure the "Huawei is Chinese spies" thing is nonsense anyway, it was part of Trump's trade war rhetoric... but the company has been successfully nullified outside of China.

arista 13-09-2021 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11093788)
I'm pretty sure the "Huawei is Chinese spies" thing is nonsense anyway, it was part of Trump's trade war rhetoric... but the company has been successfully nullified outside of China.


But Times today
has found out
there is a UK security problem.


["infiltrating" a Cambridge University research centre.]

user104658 13-09-2021 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 11093789)
But Times today
has found out
there is a UK security problem.


["infiltrating" a Cambridge University research centre.]

The "problem" is simply that they have links to Huawei and that in itself is considered to be a security risk, because Trump's anti-Huawei campaign had the company successfully branded as such.

I'm not defending them per se, allowing Chinese company to have a larger grip on the global tech market than they already do probably is indeed a mistake, but do I think their phones or tech were "spying on people" any more than any other smartphone ... ? Or that they were passing everyone's details straight to the CCP? ... No I don't.

Livia 13-09-2021 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11093788)
I'm pretty sure the "Huawei is Chinese spies" thing is nonsense anyway, it was part of Trump's trade war rhetoric... but the company has been successfully nullified outside of China.


Are you telling us that everyone who opposes Huawai has really bad grammar?

user104658 13-09-2021 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 11093814)
Are you telling us that everyone who opposes Huawai has really bad grammar?

:suspect: I'd be willing to make an argument for this being correct grammar. Huawei is a singular entity made up of thousands of people, but Huawei itself is not sentient, thus Huawei cannot be "a spy", yet to say "Huawei employees are spies" doesn't accurately capture the allegation (which IS against the company as a singular, not aimed at any individual employee).

I would accept that "Huawei spies for the CCP" is probably more succinct :think:.

bots 13-09-2021 10:29 AM

the biggest risk is letting the chinese have access to western IP, hence the worry about the connection with the cambridge uni as that will be involved in all sorts of research

Livia 13-09-2021 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11093817)
:suspect: I'd be willing to make an argument for this being correct grammar. Huawei is a singular entity made up of thousands of people, but Huawei itself is not sentient, thus Huawei cannot be "a spy", yet to say "Huawei employees are spies" doesn't accurately capture the allegation (which IS against the company as a singular, not aimed at any individual employee).

I would accept that "Huawei spies for the CCP" is probably more succinct :think:.

LOL...

Honestly TS, I've never known anyone who produces such articulat arguments when you're this wrong!

user104658 13-09-2021 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 11093830)
LOL...

Honestly TS, I've never known anyone who produces such articulat arguments when you're this wrong!

Maybe I should've gone into politics.

Livia 13-09-2021 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11093842)
Maybe I should've gone into politics.

You couldn't do worse than the politicians we've got.

user104658 13-09-2021 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 11093862)
You couldn't do worse than the politicians we've got.

I do not deny that my heart has greatly desired this...

...in place of Boris they would have a Queen! Not dark, but beautiful and terrible as the morning! Treacherous as the Sea! Stronger than the foundations of the earth!!

All shall love me and despair!

Calderyon 13-09-2021 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11093875)
I do not deny that my heart has greatly desired this...

...in place of Boris they would have a Queen! Not dark, but beautiful and terrible as the morning! Treacherous as the Sea! Stronger than the foundations of the earth!!

All shall love me and despair!

Lord of the Rings trilogy -quote (Elven Queen/Empress). Minus the name Boris.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.