Originally Posted by jachristmas1806 (Post 6551364)

She was on Tv tonight so I guess

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 6551409)

It's OK, if the BBC drop her, Channel 4 will still take her. Remember Richard Bacon? The Blue Peter presenter who was caught doing lines of cocaine out of a hooker's crack (or something like that)? Channel 4 snapped him up!

Besides, she's worth her weight in gold now. She must have... like... the best special brownies recipe ever.

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 6551391)

I find this whole thing a disgrace the way the trial is being reported by the media.

The Sun for instance had the headline at the weekend, 'Nigella gave her children drugs'.
Nigella has already given an account of herself in the trial and that headline was a total disgrace.
It was one of the accused who are on trial for allegedly stealing from her and her husband who said she had done that, it is neither likely truth or proven fact.

I hope Nigella goes from strength to strength in her career and I feel it is a shocking that she is the one being plastered all over the front pages and 'not' the 2 miserable people who are the ones actually on trial and the ones 'charged' with offences.

Originally Posted by ~HO~HO~HO~ (Post 6551434)

Originally Posted by the truth (Post 6551321)

will the beeb back her or drop her?

Originally Posted by the truth (Post 6551428)

I 100% disagree
she is a cocaine user and is a disgusting example to the kids and viewers
she tried to cover it up and was it her money they were spending or her husbands?
whats also a disgrace is the bias towards nigella by her employers the bbc, who have hopelessly yet again to be objective , which is supposedly what they claim to be...disgraceful organization displaying yet more double standards and no doubt more cover ups again

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 6551332)

Nigella wasn't on trial.

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 6551431)

Once again, Nigella was not on trial. She hasn't been found guilty of anything, the accusations have been made against her by people who are on trial for theft. The BBC would find it hard to get rid of her on the say-so of people accused of stealing from her.

Originally Posted by unwrapme (Post 6551439)

well that a good question

the way i see it is if bbc parted company with every one that taken drugs or been in some sorts of trouble there be no one on bbc

Originally Posted by the truth (Post 6551442)

This was not the question asked. I think this is a reply deliberately designed to derail the topic.

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 6551447)

My reply was in answer to you question. She was not on trial. On what grounds would you suggest the BBC try to get rid of her? On the say so of some people accused of stealing from her?

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 6551431)

Once again, Nigella was not on trial. She hasn't been found guilty of anything, the accusations have been made against her by people who are on trial for theft. The BBC would find it hard to get rid of her on the say-so of people accused of stealing from her.

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 6551447)

My reply was in answer to you question. She was not on trial. On what grounds would you suggest the BBC try to get rid of her? On the say so of some people accused of stealing from her?

Originally Posted by the truth (Post 6551450)

Its not just on their say so as you well know

Originally Posted by King Moonracer (Post 6551454)

Well she has also admitted taking cocaine under oath, even if it's not to the extent that the defendants have accused her of

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 6551456)

What evidence are you referring to then?